It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
From the Ming Dynasty emperors to Mao Zedong, China's military prowess has been based on large land armies.
This year China is celebrating the 80th anniversary of the Peoples' Liberation Army.
But its traditional strategic thinking is undergoing a huge shift, prompting fears in the United States that China might pose a threat to American diplomatic and military power with a naval arms race in the Pacific.
The PLA or its commercial businesses, however, may use COSCO ships in commercial shipping or in wartime.
China's flagship commercial shipping fleet, China Ocean Shipping Company [COSCO], is directly connected to the People's Liberation Army and the Chinese communist government. COSCO ships have served as carriers for massive smuggling operations around the world--including the United States--of weapons, drugs and illegal aliens. In addition, COSCO has been used by the Chinese government to ship missiles and components of weapons of mass destruction to rogue nations such as Pakistan and Iran.
COSCO ships are considered to be part of the Chinese Navy and are frequently armed with guns and missiles during Chinese Army amphibious training exercises.
The 600-ship Cosco fleet has had a checkered past:
* In 1991 the Far East Economic Review reported 20 battle tanks were transported to the brutal Burmese military regime aboard a Cosco ship.
* ln 1992 Cosco was fined $400,000 by the Federal Maritime Commission, or FMC, on charges of paying kickbacks to secure customers.
* ln 1992, 200 containers of North Korean rocket fuel bound for Pakistan were seized on a Cosco ship by Hong Kong customs agents.
* In 1993, 87 pounds of heroin were seized on a Cosco ship that was docked in Canada.
* ln December 1996, a Cosco ship rammed a crowded boardwalk in New Orleans.
* In March 1996, 2,000 AK-47 assault rifles bound for U.S. street gangs were seized on a Cosco ship in Oakland by U.S. Customs agents.
and I don't think they have the capability (at the moment) to fight that kind of conflict - although they may in future.
Originally posted by budski
I was aware of their "mercantile" fleet, but wonder at the effectiveness against a modern CBG.
That's how Japan tried to win - by opposing force with equal force in CBG terms, and it worked for a little while.
The close relations existing between Beijing and Moscow from 1949-58 represent an exceptional interlude in the much longer historical pattern of mutual suspicion and hostility between China and Russia. China and Russia had border disputes since the seventeenth century when Tsarist forces occupied Nerchinsk and Yakasa in the Amur region (north of Mongolia and west of northern Nei Mongol). The eighteenth century saw Russian incursions in the Lake Balkhash area, near Northwest Xinjiang. By the beginning of the nineteenth century, the Russians had seized a total 1.4 million square kilometers, and another 1.5 million by 1900. The Russians codified these gains through a series of 'unequal treaties,' as current Chinese histories call them.
The Beijing government began to challenge Soviet occupation of these disputed areas in 1963, and, with China's demonstration of its nuclear capability in 1964, the military build-up on both sides of the border began in earnest. In Japanese press, Mao was quoted as saying that both Vladivostok and Khabarovsk were on territory that had belonged to China save for 'unequal treaties.'
Soviet ground forces had been augmented in the last half of 1967 in regions bordering China in the Far East and Transbaykal Military Districts. From 1965 to the end of 1969, the USSR increased its deployment of ground forces in the military districts adjacent to the Chinese border from 13 divisions to 21 divisions.
By the time Henry Kissinger visited China in the summer of 1971, dominant voices in Beijing were convinced that China faced a potentially more dangerous and immediate adversary than the United States. This shift in primary adversaries from the United States to the USSR contributed to the achievement of a Sino-American rapprochement confirmed by President Richard Nixon when he visited China in February 1972.
The Sino-Soviet border dispute was particularly disturbing since both the USSR and China were now nuclear powers. However, in order to limit the danger of secalation, a tacit bargain was apparently reached that neither side would resort to air power. In the following years, annual rounds of talks were held, all without significant progress. Border provocations occasionally recurred in later years--for example, in May 1978 when Soviet troops in boats and a helicopter intruded into Chinese territory--but major armed clashes were averted.
In July 1986, Mikhail Gorbachev announced the Soviet Union's "...willingness to improve relations with mainland China," and settle the border dispute. Both parties signed a treaty in May 1991, and the Russian Federation ratified it the following winter. In April 1990, both countries also signed the "Agreement on Guiding Principles for the Mutual Reduction of Military Forces Along the Sino-Soviet Boundary and the Strengthening Confidences in the Military." This agreement provides for a mutual reduction of troops along the border and limits military activities to defense. In 1990, the Soviets had about a quarter of its ground and air forces and a third of its navy dedicated to the border, or 56 divisions containing 700,000 troops when fully mobilized. The Chinese had 1 million soldiers deployed along the 7500-kilometer border.
Originally posted by xpert11
Budski I'm not arguing against the F-22 superiority but there could be an problem if there simply isnt enough of them around . The other issue is that the USAF and hasn't faced any creditable opposition in more then a generation so its capability's can only be worked out on paper and debated on ATS. While I wouldn't say that it would be ease to sink a USN flat top it would be very dangerous to adopt the "no aircraft has or will sink a battleship" mentality.
If my above post highlighted anything it is that there still weapons available to the underdog.
Originally posted by sy.gunson
Hmm I was reading recently that China has six carriers in the same class as the Varyvaag mainly in the Pearl River behind Hong Kong.
Originally posted by sy.gunson
Officially they are classed as children's amusment parks.
Originally posted by sy.gunson
Russia has been supplying China with refurbished Yak VSTOL fighters for operations from these floating amusement parks.
Originally posted by sy.gunson
China has a fleet of extremely modern SSN hunter killers called the Han Class.
Originally posted by sy.gunson
Rather the USA has pretty much abandoned leadership in the region for decades.
Originally posted by Cyber_Wasp
Seriously dudes, do not get caught up in this smoke screen.
The days of this paranoia are done. How many times does history have to repeat itself?
People are waking up to the fact that this is just another effort for the people behind the scenes to grab more money and power at the cost of more innocent lives.
Look hard...and I mean really hard behind the scenes at who is pushing this stuff. Look at who will benefit from a China / USA escalation in tension.
It will not be Joe Average.