It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AncientVoid
And the quotes are for?
Originally posted by AncientVoid
The proof that God exist?
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
That says NOTHING about anything having to do with the nuclear bomb and his thoughts there in.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Your taking a quote about a completely UNRELATED MATTER.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Einstein wasn't perfect so what he thinks is largely unimportant on the topic of the existance of a higher power since he was human (albeit a VERY smart one) after all and capable of mistakes same as anyone else.
Originally posted by melatonin
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Hmmmmm ever try to disagree with global warming? Try it.
You can disagree all you like. The problem is actually being able to bring forth evidence to support your position.
That's where deniers and cranks seem to have an issue.
It is related, as Einstein apparently believe science and religion worked together. Although it doesn't sound like he'd go as far as saying science IS a religion, he does believe they're very much inter-related.
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by AncientVoid
And the quotes are for?
A demonstration of a brilliant scientist who believes religion and science are two integral pieces.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Hmmmmm ever try to disagree with global warming? Try it.\
Simple fact of the matter you cannot completely disprove whether or not there is a higher power. You are ACTING ON FAITH of what others have said. You have faith in what they say fine. By all means continue.
Let me try this little hypothetical gem on you. And answer or just bugger off.
What if there was a higher power. And what if it did not want us to have complete undeniable proof of its existance or of a life after physical death.
And since I obvious have to add this would not want or need worship or even noticing.
You know wants us to figure things out for ourselves. And here is the key to the WHOLE thing it also SET THE WHOLE THING UP. Do you honestly think mankind, we little specks of things smaller than dust living on a grain of sand on this vast beach we call the universe would be able to prove or disprove it? Yes or no.
We both know the answer though.
Simple fact is your making a leap of faith, just as the christians are that there is in a fact a god, just in the opposite direction. You can only walk so far on what we know FOR CERTAIN and then you start leaping.
Scientific method is based in the physical
and if the spiritual does in fact exist Scientific method is woefully inequiped to study it.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
And p.s. you people can try to henpeck me into submission but thats not going to happen.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
And p.s. you people can try to henpeck me into submission but thats not going to happen.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
And NO I AM NOT TALKING TO YOU SAINT YOU ARE A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT TYPE OF BEAST.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
um... yes, actually anywhere from 40-60% of the scientific community either is unsure of outright disagrees with global warming...
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
actually, it's also based on the abstract concept of logic..
no no no
i am acting on a LACK of faith. you are affirming a position, i am saying you haven't proven it.
logical fallacy, special pleading....
you really should read up on logical fallacies.
i'm not taking a leap. i'm saying "i don't know if this thing exists or not, but its existence is unproven, and i don't believe in things whose existence aren't proven"
so you're saying that, if the spiritual exists... it isn't part of the natural world and not subject to any sort of logic and reason?
now, can you explain why that is?
Sheesh, who cares. Revel in your ignorance for all I care. This thread should have died within the first few posts. The dogmatic are those who are completely beyond rational argument, so I see a bit of projection here.
Any scientist can disagree with whatever they like, in fact, it is embodied in the notion of scepticism. However, until they bring forth actual reliable and valid scientific evidence, they obviously won't make much impact.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
I am affirming the right to question and not attack others with different view points then what you yourself accept. You affirm the right to bash like you know 100% better. And you have not proven 100% your position either.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Like I said if gravity, something as fundamental to our existance as that confuses us. You really got to ask yourself, do we really know all that much?
Neither is it completely disproven. Two edged sword there m8.
So I take it you also believe there is no such thing as life on other planets as well? That has not been proven.
And that is what I mean. The keyword here "belief", you believe something. Belief is not reality and pretending otherwise is silly.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Yep mankind can biopsy/vivsect the universe and thusly know everything. (sarcasm)
And most scientists that try to disagree with accepted what-not and have evidence and etc on it will be attacked in other ways. Politics reign supreme in human affairs.
And will most likely lose their livelihoods in the process. It's happend.
You've proven what percent? 0?
Then why do people believe in god and have such a detailed concept of it? When you guys keep on saying how complex it is, 2 complex for humans. Then how do you guys know there's a god?
I'm pretty sure this belife of life on other planets is based on the vastness of this universe and facts or data. Not just based on nothing at all...
Yeh look what happened when the Church screwed up the world for 1400 ( years, not only when they believed that the whole universe orbited the Earth, but killed anyone who dared go agaisnt them...
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Yet you continue to post.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
And monkey boy proves my point.
Because when people make silly statements like 'teh climit syince iz teh dogmar!!!111!!oneoneone"
I just have to poke the person who said it. I guess I'm like a sort of moth drawn to shining ignorance. I must build some decent will-power...
And to answer the silly question. Yes, if an invisible intelligent cup-cake exists but she doesn't want to be eaten by hungry people and so has absolutely no impact on the natural world, to the point it would seem such cup-cakes don't exist, then we won't be able to assess its existence.
All you would do is posit something that is forever beyond testing, that has absolutely no impact on nature. Well done. I think we can stick that in the 'most useless scientific concepts ever' box. Either that, or call it 'sophisticated' theology.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Yet when someone disagrees or expresses doubt they are immediately blasted. Hmmmmm.
Yea that is not a duck its a spider monkey.
Ignorance is obivously subjective. Seeing as to how anyone who disagrees with you must be ignorant as you apply it.
Finally someone answers the question that you guys have been tiptoeing around for a while now. Sure you attempted to turn it into a joke and lessen the impact of the fact that you admit that we would not be able to prove or disprove such a creature. But all well I expect such, you still admited it.
If such events and creature exist it would have an impact on nature as the thing that got things going, and once again can't be disproven so thusly possible, we don't know, many never know, anyone who does not agree we are limited being is fooling themselves. And nor could we guess its reasons.
You posit, no you state as 100% beyond a doubt proven fact, the lack of an existance of such a creature.
I didn't even blast you. I disagreed with you.