It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Proof" is a mathematical concept. It cannot be applied to the physical world. It is not possible to "prove" anything. There is always the possibility of new knowledge coming along that contradicts the old. If you ask me, I would say that the entire concept of "science" is based on this idea, that it isn't possible to "know" anything. That you never dismiss information based on assumptions. This is the whole point of "science" as a method. To never "have faith" in anything, always test the information you currently have, always be willing to consider new information, and always be willing to refine, and update your old knowledge when new knowledge becomes available.
If you ever believe anything, you are exhibiting faith. Nothing is exempt from this. If you , against all indication to the contrary, continue to have blind faith that science is not a religion, then you are guilty of the very thing you find so repugnant:
Having beliefs based in faith.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Has anyone read it?
But, he is right that religion and science are not mutually exclusive, and as long as his faith isn't pushed into his science, not a problem.
But, he is right that religion and science are not mutually exclusive, and as long as his faith isn't pushed into his science, not a problem.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Whoa whoa whoa wait a minute here. Don't I remember you saying something to the effect that it was impossible for science to be a religion?
Nice attempt at backstepping.
Originally posted by MajorMalfunction
reply to post by Skyfloating
Sorry, but that is incorrect. Science is a way of describing and exploring the world using scientific method, which tests and re-tests current knowledge and hypotheses with actual evidence.
Religion is faith based on no evidence at all.
Science is NOT a religion. Those that say so are fooling themselves.
Originally posted by MajorMalfunction
Sorry, but that is incorrect. Science is a way of describing and exploring the world using scientific method, which tests and re-tests current knowledge and hypotheses with actual evidence.
Religion is faith based on no evidence at all.
Science is NOT a religion. Those that say so are fooling themselves.
Originally posted by Corum
It's an insult to science to compare it to religion. Science is about truth. What's religion about? Love? Peace? Truth? Don't make me laugh. Aside from that, the definition of religion is a belief structure based on at least one deity. Science is based on facts and theories based on facts. To say that science is the same as religion just because they are both ''belief'' structures is complete horsesh*t for completely obvious reasons.
Originally posted by jfj123
Here's the difference between the two in a nutshell
SCIENCE: relies on proof to believe in something.
RELIGION: relies on belief in something with the absence of proof.
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by jfj123
Secondly, there are many incidents where science utilizes proofs to establish a belief that something will happen (or that something has happened like in forensics). A predictable outcome is a belief. It's not a strong belief since it is based on previous proofs, but is a belief nonetheless and is prone to fallibility from time to time.
[edit on 30-8-2007 by saint4God]
Man, it's pointless to argue with them. Haven't you noticed that all this aruging is really getting no where? You could make all the sense in the world and all your doing is wasting your time. If someone does not wish to see what your saying they never will. Not even your Jesus could change everyones mind remember (if he did exist, not that I will argue either way because I wasn't present back then)?
[edit on 30-8-2007 by WraothAscendant]
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by Corum
It's an insult to science to compare it to religion. Science is about truth. What's religion about? Love? Peace? Truth? Don't make me laugh. Aside from that, the definition of religion is a belief structure based on at least one deity. Science is based on facts and theories based on facts. To say that science is the same as religion just because they are both ''belief'' structures is complete horsesh*t for completely obvious reasons.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Man, it's pointless to argue with them.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Haven't you noticed that all this aruging is really getting no where?
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
You could make all the sense in the world and all your doing is wasting your time. If someone does not wish to see what your saying they never will.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Not even your Jesus could change everyones mind remember (if he did exist, not that I will argue either way because I wasn't present back then)?
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
AHHHHHH!!!!!! By the gods you did NOT just quote a buncha bible mumbo jumbo at me.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Ok, ok, ok, ok. Just gotta remind myself that I don't believe in telling anyone their beliefs are wrong. But I will say this.
All that mumbo jumbo you just spewed. Not going to convince a non-believer of jack
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
so you can spew bible verses til you are blue in the face.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
And next time READ ALL THAT I HAVE TO SAY NOT JUST WHAT YOU WANT TO SEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
And I will ask this. Do you even know his true B-day?
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Do you know truly when he died?
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
I'm talking dates here. Don't say christmas and easter though. They were stolen from my people the pagans.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Ever wonder what was up with the bunnies of Easter?
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
And the word Yule in Christmas songs?
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
What we have here boils and ghouls is a classic example of religious hypocracy.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Considering the context of the conversation.
I did, although I did address what I wanted to address