posted on Aug, 16 2007 @ 08:34 AM
Let me try ( I have a really hard time getting the concept in the head to be understandable on the page) to explain why our seeming direct observation
of the universe is skewed be the intrinsic bias of us , and every tool we use,
being made of the matter that was converted out of the QP of the BB.
First I start from the position that there WAS a BB , this is a position solely based on my agreement with COBE and other observation platforms that
seem to show expansion from a starting point and relative uniform back ground microwave radiation. Many I have tried to explain my postulate too first
jump in and state that there was no BB so from that point the explanation will always fail.
Consider what was the "Stuff" of the BB.. I have dubbed is a Quantum Point ... This seems to be the best term of description I can conger and
I conceive it as a Quantum of energy of an indefinable content. indefinable because before time 0 it is void of any matter and as such it cannot be
defined by any physical rules as all physical rules only apply to matter in relation to other matter. Eisenstein generally proved that matter Can be
converted into energy and energy back into matter so this Quantum point can be converted into matter.
We are here speaking of it so it by logic must have done so.
So the QP must follow some rule and the only one that can apply would be Probability. I see it as having the probability to convert none, very little,
some or all of that energy into matter.
Take the mental exercise of a 1oz cube of matter. it has a finite mass, a finite 3 dim structure and exist in a finite point in space/time. If I were
able to completely convert that matter into energy without any other matter in relation to it, it would have to be considered as an infinite amount of
energy. Because there is no physical rules that can be applied it will always model as infinite and chaotic.
So while we try to define the QP of the BB we always fail and all rules of physics fail. That failure causes us to conceptualize infinity.
Now lets say the QP actually had a finite amount of Unified Indefinable Energy. It converts a portion of that energy into matter. The concept
I see is that it only converted a portion into matter and anti-matter . That begs the question of what the remaining Unified Indefinable
Energy is and how it permeates the universe.
Now if I follow that admittly nebulous abstract concept I must recognize that I, You, and every particle in the universe exist within that remaining
energy. That leads me to envision that the remaining Unified Indefinable Energy of the QP still exist and is only spread out as the matter is
propelled by the early conversions of the converted matter as it is converted into
various forms of Physical Energies such as kinetic, L/H nuke ect. as matter and anti-matter run into each other early on.
I could explain that better if needed but its just a prolog to what we are speaking.
Now, We have real little physical balls of stuff after this inflation period and I think they are connected via the remaining Unified Indefinable
Energy left over from the BB. Since these SPP's (Smallest Physical Particles) were converted and blasted by the BB they are set to ringing and this
ringing produces a EM wave which propagates between every other SPP. You cannot ever know what that wave form is actually because every SPP produces a
EM wave and if I were a SPP trying to observe another SPP all I observe is the Heterodyne wave of my own wave form and all other SPP's.
So that is where I get the concept of Intrinsic Bias. When we dig up ore to smelt the metals to build the devices we use to observe we, without
knowing it, are picking materials that have Intrinsic Bias. We are connected to the device which is connected to the subject of our observation.
So how does this fit with the standard model ? It actually seems to fit pretty well. And in my mind actually simplifies the universe. It also allows a
Unified view th