It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Lets talk about Space Serpents! They are REAL!!

page: 3
7
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 14 2007 @ 10:28 PM
link   
Interesting post, they do look like lifeforms but video quality isn't that great.

Maybe if thermal or other kinds of cameras were used, one could prove it.




posted on Aug, 14 2007 @ 11:05 PM
link   
Wow!...isn't it such a coincedence that every time someone has seen something unexplainable...someone else just happens to come out with a video to explain the whole thing, with a worm shaped baloon or a paper bag full of hot air flying into the night. Who are the people releasing this snaky "solar baloon" into the air, what were thair findings after letting this thing go? It seems like everything "unexplainable" becomes explainable far too easy with the use of baloons or some other form of "cover up" gadget.



posted on Aug, 14 2007 @ 11:59 PM
link   
Does anyone remember the NASA groud-based camera video posted
here (ATS) a few months ago that showed a Worm-like creature
twisting and turning through the sky under the clouds? Actually, I think
a few threads have been posted showing these entities in the lower
atmosphere.

Since NASA itself watches these things both in and above the atmosphere
why don't they dispatch a helicopter to snare one of them? These
"serpents" never appear to be moving fast, like typical UFO's do. It seems
as if one would have been captured by now.



posted on Aug, 15 2007 @ 02:39 AM
link   
Isaac's supposed rebuttal to the drone hoax arguement

You can read the rest of his statements at the above link, but here's an excerpt that sums up my feelings very well.



His comment that 'the aliens don't do this or that' is akin to saying 'humans don't speak Japanese.' Well, many humans don't, but Japanese humans certainly do. The point is not that his statement is right or wrong, but simply that it's phrased illogically.


The term "serpent" is a human construct given to the anomaly not understood so if it pleases you, instead of serpent, use worm instead.. whatever you use, the commander shooting this film understood this to be an anomaly and filmed it because it was odd to his senses. If you can trust a person to fly a space craft, you also have to trust that person to be in a rational state of mind.
That being said, this wormy serpent is completely unknown to us. If it's a craft, then so what that it doesn't make sense to you.
if it's a biological form, so what? The world as you know it is common to only 3% of the universe. the rest of the universe is of a completely different composition than what is taught in textbooks.
Could this be a dark-matter beings antenna? Could it be how orbs reproduce and you are watching space porn?
Whatever it is, the closest logical explanation i have seen is that it is a tumbling, twisting piece of debris but after watching it 2000 times I see it performing erratic maneuvers outside of what a rigid, space frozen piece of junk would do. Even if it wasn't rigid, the continuity of the motion seems to give it some sort of intelligent origin.

I have no clue to what it is, but it isn't junk and I bet it would take offense at such a statement if it even knows what "taking offense" is.
It is also a FACT that this is not junk because if I had it at my house I would do something useful with it. I'll show you my Lamont shirt if I have to prove it.
b



posted on Aug, 15 2007 @ 08:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
O.K. Fine. It's a scary space serpent, lol. I can't wait to see what else you guys come up with in the coming months.


Here's something I've just discovered. You are aware that the scary space serpent's preffered diet are fresh, wriggling, uber realists, dontcha IgnoreTheFacts?

Keep those running shoes ready if they decide to come down for a snack!

Seriously, I don't think there'l be any further developments on this story in the forseeable future. We'll just go round in circles divesting ourselves of various opinions, as we always do when there's no obvious way to end a discussion. But, saying that, healthy discussion breeds interest, and that can't harm any subject.

And I still think they're critters.


Edit: waffling...

[edit on 15-8-2007 by Beamish]



posted on Aug, 15 2007 @ 08:41 AM
link   
Hey Hikix,
The Russians have just done a study on dust particles in vacuums and have come to some very strange conclusions-that dust in the vacuum of space takes on the form of DNA helix shapes,which can (get this!) divide and replicate!Like living cells!
They also say these formations can improve their build over generations,ditching the "junk" and becoming more efficient!
They are calling this phenomena "inorganic life"-how cool is that man?
Heres a link or two:

www.sciencedaily.com...


www.eurekalert.org...

Maybe if left for a long while in space,these "whatevers" could become vast,and big enough to see with our optical equipment-could this be the space serpents that you speak of?
Cool Thread BTW.




posted on Aug, 15 2007 @ 09:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by Silcone Synapse

The Russians have just done a study on dust particles in vacuums and have come to some very strange conclusions-that dust in the vacuum of space takes on the form of DNA helix shapes,which can (get this!) divide and replicate!Like living cells!


Good. Grief.

Well, there's a turn up for the books, and me posting that nothing new will come along regarding "space serpents" for ages!!


While this isn't as yet an explanation for the large critters we're seeing on NASA footage, I have to agree with Silicon Synapse, (whilst admiting that I am in no way any sort of expert) that it it's perhaps logical to expect this to be a possible answer.
Also, if these new "life-forms" are behaving in the same way as living creatures do down here, then perhaps they too grow to sizes appropriate to their environment. With the vastness of space surrounding them, that could explain some of the spheres in NASA footage having gained apparently phenomenal sizes.

Inorganic life-forms. What a bizarre thought.

I wonder if they have some sort of primordial consciousness that instils in them the need to grow, weed out the weak in their number, and multiply? Now that is truly alien.



posted on Aug, 15 2007 @ 09:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by Beamish


Also, if these new "life-forms" are behaving in the same way as living creatures do down here, then perhaps they too grow to sizes appropriate to their environment. With the vastness of space surrounding them, that could explain some of the spheres in NASA footage having gained apparently phenomenal sizes.



Good point Beamish-I wonder if this phenomena is replicatable in our atmosphere-I am thinking of the numerous "rod" sightings.Could they be something similar?
The MOD have been talking about something they call "dusty plasma" being reponsible for UFO sightings recently,could this also be related?
They talk about it in these documents:

www.mod.uk... .htm



posted on Aug, 15 2007 @ 03:09 PM
link   
Wow, that's some reading, SS!!

This dusty plasma may well be an explanation for some UFOs, but it certainly doesn't explain the nuts and bolt craft that have been witnessed and photographed. For the MoD to offer such an explanation, if nothing else, at least means they are acknowledging UFOs are actually there and not figments of over active imaginations.

Whilst I'm very interested in whatever is "up there", rods, for me, have, unfortunately, been successfully debunked. However, there's no way the NASA vids are of insects sailing gracefully past the camera!

As to the smart dust (and bearing in mind no mistakes or assumptions have been made by the relevant scientists), surely, if NASA want to alleiviate the yells of "UFO!", it makes sense for them to take advantage of this discovery, and actually acknowledge there is an ongoing phenomena happening right in front of their cameras.

If Disclosure is going to happen, even if it is happening now, this is a golden opportunity for them to come clean. Can't you hear their explanations?

"Yes, the footage is real, and now we can tell you what they contain. We've been biding our time until we were certain..."



posted on Aug, 15 2007 @ 05:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by Beamish

This dusty plasma may well be an explanation for some UFOs, but it certainly doesn't explain the nuts and bolt craft that have been witnessed and photographed. For the MoD to offer such an explanation, if nothing else, at least means they are acknowledging UFOs are actually there and not figments of over active imaginations.

Whilst I'm very interested in whatever is "up there", rods, for me, have, unfortunately, been successfully debunked. However, there's no way the NASA vids are of insects sailing gracefully past the camera!

Nice1 Beamish-Those MOD files about dusty plasma reek of "give them anything,call it a weather balloon!"
I was actually seething the first time I read those."dusty whaaat!?"You got it spot on,theres a slim chance it may be responsible for a small percentage of sightings-if it even exists as they say it does-but many more sightings defy this explanation.This is why I feel this MOD theory is planned disinformation,maybe even to the degree that they want or expect us to say"this is silly,there must be more to it than they say..."



posted on Aug, 16 2007 @ 06:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by Silcone Synapse
This is why I feel this MOD theory is planned disinformation,maybe even to the degree that they want or expect us to say"this is silly,there must be more to it than they say..."


Another way of looking at it is that this is part of slow leak disclosure.

The military, and this is not intended as a slur on the rank and file soldier of any army, has been known to be the blunt tool through which governments enforce their will. And maybe, in this case, the UK government is simply taking a pre-ordained stance in the UFO debate by publishing their military's findings on "dusty plasma". This explanation is unusual, but acceptable because it comes from a reputable source (now perhaps having been backed up by scientific discoveries). It is not a blanket denial, and that's the important part. They're saying yes, there are things flying around our atmosphere, and this is what we "believe" they are.

We accept their explanation, ingest it, increase our trust in the authorities, and go to bed safe in the knowledge they are looking after us.

However, what we've actually done is allowed ourselves to let the idea of strange, previously unheard of phenomena into our lives. We might not understand it, but heck it must be there if the MoD say it is. They're there to protect the land and therefore must have the latest intelligence available to help them in that endeavour, musn't they?

IMO, "dusty plasma" and "inorganic life forms" could well be one and the same. Therefore, with both of these public releases, I think we're being slowly fed info that is conditioning us to accept the idea of non terrestial life. As I said previously, all we need now is for NASA to go down the same road.



posted on Aug, 16 2007 @ 07:52 PM
link   
I don't know if it's related to space serpents but these photos I found are interesting.







posted on Aug, 17 2007 @ 11:05 PM
link   
I don't think they are snakes.

Explorer and filmmaker Jose Escamilla shared an update on the strange flying rods he discovered while investigating UFOs in 1994. The finned, gelatinous creatures look like "flying snakes" or cuttlefish and undulate through the air as though in a liquid, he said. He was able to capture them on video by using a high shutter speed. Lower shutter speeds will capture blurred birds and insects and that is where a lot of the confusion has set in, he explained.

"I am only presenting the visual evidence," he noted, though he
did hypothesize that the RODS may be visiting from another planetary system or another dimension, and that they have been with us for a long time, as cave paintings showed creatures that are similar to them.

Part of their life cycle involves living in water, he claimed. Along with a Nippon TV crew, Escamilla investigated the very deep Cave of the Swallows in Mexico, where a 3 ft. long ROD was photographed.

You will find picts here

www.roswellrods.com...



posted on Oct, 16 2008 @ 05:03 PM
link   
I saw this part of Secret Space last night. The UFO looked a bit like a microscopic creature.
That carries no meaning in my mind...it is simply an observation.
The footage seen on SS DVD was interesting...some seemed quite real.
The movement was not quite biological as we would think it...but not quite mechanical either.
The creature appeared to be a creature.
It did not seem to be intelligent much less malevolent, but I am not in it's mind.
I am a born skeptic...however that also goes to the extreme of saying I am skeptical of it being a hoax.
It would be beyond arrogant for me to say with absolute certainty yes or no.

I found more disturbing the appearance in the video that the beings were fired upon.
If NASA wants to release this info, and show themselves possibly fire on them...then maybe convey some reason also why the aggressive approach...just "because"?

In the end...for all we know...there could be something much, much bigger out there that NASA and the US is trying to deflect our attention from.

They remind me of gummie worms too...cool.

ok...well thanks to this site for letting throw out some ideas without all the joining process.

-kaboom



posted on Mar, 16 2010 @ 04:49 PM
link   
here's a video i took in florida, march 30, 2009 of a space serpent

www.youtube.com...

[edit on 16-3-2010 by raynemarina]



posted on Mar, 16 2010 @ 05:00 PM
link   
reply to post by raynemarina
 

It looks like a short contrail from a jet to me.
The "wiggling" would seem to be caused by using digital zoom.



posted on Mar, 18 2010 @ 04:47 AM
link   
Thats not a space serpeant

Its FALCOR!!!!!

Of course riding falcor requires the obligatory fist pumping while saying,

YEAAAAAA

YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA




[edit on 18-3-2010 by tigpoppa]



posted on Mar, 18 2010 @ 05:38 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


I agree that the wriggling could well be - and most likely is - caused by the camera and Youtube compression etc.

However, as to it being a section of contrail; would such a diaphonous form maintain its integrity for such a long time?



posted on Mar, 18 2010 @ 05:39 AM
link   



posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 09:15 PM
link   
There is NO WAY those are alife. They would be frozen solid in orbit.



new topics

top topics



 
7
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join