It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jakomo
Excellent question, and excellent article. Do Iraqis have the right to resist against the US Occupation? Do they have the right to strike against the military to try and topple the Occupation Authority?
Originally posted by GeniusSage
and why the HELL would russia invade canada? dont even use comparisons like that - its utterly stupid.
Originally posted by superpower
Whether Americans are morally right or wrong is not of concern to you--only that America loses--loses power, loses "face", loses in improving the living conditions of people throughout the world.
Originally posted by superpower
Yeah criminals have the "right" to kill everybody. Criminals have the right shoot blow buildings of AID workers HELPING PEOPLE... disguise themselves as Ambulance drivers and blow up residential buildings...uhh right....
Originally posted by superpower
Are you people INSANE! A totalitarian, ruthless dictatorship was toppled.
Rhetoric 101. Now give us your own thoughts, please. How many totalitarian, ruthless dictators do we support all around the world? Plenty. But they know better than to get out of hand. The U.S. government knew full well what Saddam Hussein was when they helped install him into power. The Reagan/Bush administrations knew full well that he was using chemical weapons against his adversaries within the country and without. And I might add, it was largely the U.S. government who supplied Saddam with those weapons. Don't get me wrong, after the '79 Iranian revolution and the taking of our hostages, Iran was definitely our enemy number one. The decision to support Saddam came because (A) he was pro-west, (B) he was the enemy of our enemy and (C) his nation sat atop the world's second largest oil reserve. The decision to align with Saddam, I suppose, was one of those necessary evils. Giving him WMD capabilities is debateable.
Amnesty I., Canegie, the UN and all these peace lovers ought to give Bush a freaking GOLD MEDAL OF FREEDOM.
Or put on trial for war crimes in the Hague. By the way, I'm a veteran, who fought for what I thought was right at the time, but I am also a lover of peace, first and foremost. War makes you appreciate peace in way those who have never been there can never understand. Loving peace and hating war does not make one a coward. It's reprehensible to even suggest that.
He's done for more to advance HUMAN RIGHTS and DEMOCRACY than anybody in the world (including Kofi Annan and Desmond Tutu).
Simply laughable.
The criminals are being shot as they well should be and a legitimate, representative democracy has at least some potential now...
Again, ludicrous and laughable. Legitimate?
And instead of thanking the US you sound like a bunch of whining babies.
You sound like a bloodthirsty war monger. Congratulations.
Occupation is a direct result of Iraq's ignorant actions
I suggest you go back and take a long hard look at what really happened with regard to Saddam and Iraq, particularly leading up to the invasion of Kuwait. Bush Sr., Baker and Ambassador April Glaspie tricked Saddam into thinking we wouldn't "have any position" if he invaded. Remember, that is, if you weren't in grade school at the time, Kuwait and Iraq were embroiled in an economic war. Saddam warned them, asked us if we had a position, got the green light and then invaded. Then lo and behold, suddenly the Bush administration absolutely had a position. And that was, now that we had Saddam baited into it, with all the world watching his aggression, we could easily invade. Hence, marking our presence in Arabia forever more. There was no other way to gain access for our military inside Saudi Arabia. They had to be threatened on a colossal scale. Worked like a charm.
--if they were able to have a responsible nation then it wouldn't be necessary. (is the USA invading any of 250 other nations -- I think not)
With all due respect, judging from your comments, you don't have a great deal of understanding when it comes to the country known as Iraq (something the Brits named their little creation).
But of course the real reason you are upset -- you hate the USA and whatever it stands for, even if it means being an ignorant sloth. You hate the success of the USA.
Did you ever serve your country? I hate the USA? I hate the country I love and served? Simply ridiculous. That's just one of those weak as hell things to say when you can't think for yourself. You'll have to dig a little deeper, if that's possible.
And your hate blinds you -- yours is the most selfish ideology of them all on par with Fascism, Nazism and the "vanguard" Stalinsm.
Again, you're gonna have to start studying a little more. It is your programmed ideology that is fascist. Before you accuse someone of such nonsense, it would help if you had a clear understanding of the terminology you use.
Not only are you powerless, impotent to affect freedom, but you criticize, discredit it and destroy it. It's shameful.
In the U.S., we have the constitutional right to dissent. If you disagree with that, you are a definitely a fascist. And one thing I've noticed about Bush and just about every last one of his supporters, they cannot bear disagreement with their policies. They cannot handle dissent. Because they cannot justify their racist, inhuman ideology intellectually. It's pathetic.