It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Donoso
Now, I really do enjoy the whole "structures" on the moon theory. I really do. In fact, I believe there ARE artificial structures up there very much like a monolith and or a self reproducing factory which creates probes much like itself and sends them sprawling across the galaxy landing on other moons in hopes of finding a race which can make contact with it. But the whole artificial moon thing is just too much and has an extremely low amount of data (if any) to support it.
Originally posted by Postal76
Oh, and what data do you have to support your opinion that there are artificial structures on the moon?
Originally posted by sherpa
Hi Donoso, in reference to:
"I don't understand the whole "artificial" moon theory. To me, it's completely absurd and ridiculous to think that any creature would fly on down next to Earth with something that huge. "
This might be something to think about.
The moon’s mean density is 3.34 gm/cm3 (3.34 times an equal volume of water) whereas the Earth’s is 5.5. What does this mean? In 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon MacDonald stated, "If the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere." Nobel chemist Dr. Harold Urey suggested the moon’s reduced density is because of large areas inside the moon where is "simply a cavity." MIT’s Dr. Sean C. Solomon wrote, "the Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the moon’s gravitational field . . . indicating the frightening possibility that the moon might be hollow." In Carl Sagan’s treatise, Intelligent Life in the Universe, the famous astronomer stated, "A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object."
Originally posted by zoopnfunk
Originally posted by johnlear
I would like to respectfully propose that one (but not the only) reason you can't see anything in these photos is because you are not ready to accept reality. Either not ready or not able (for whatever reason).
Builidings on the moon reprresent a direct threat to ones sense of reality and if one is having trouble with reality even without aliens on the moon, or is perfectly content with ones perception of reality one is certainly not going to accept anything that represents a threat to his or hers perception of 'reality'. Just a guess. And thanks again for your input.
John, confirming the existence of intelligence outside our home here on earth is an exciting proposition to many of us. Some may feel threatened by the existence of more intelligence beings, but I don't count myself amongst them. Actually I, and I think others, would find it somewhat comforting.
However, I can't allow my personal desires to influence my judgement.
I don't see any man made structures, roads, buildings or reactors in those pictures -- as cool as they are.
Might I respecfully propose that you are seeing structures in those pictures because you want so badly to believe that you may be unconsciously willing to allow your imagination to fill in the blanks?
Originally posted by Iblis
Judging by the angle of light -- I'd say an outcrop of rock, like a pillar.
Craters aren't perfectly round and even ya' know.
John, do you think these "structures" up there could very much be exactly just that: reproducing factories in hopes of landing on a moon which is situated next to a planet with sentient life, just waiting for us to make contact? Would you agree with these "close minded" physicists who actually came up with this concept which they find acceptable and extremely possible (likely)?
Also, Mr. Lear, if movies are your forte, why is Invasion of the body snatchers being remade again? The 4th version of this film comes out in a few days. What are they trying to tell us?
This thread, in short, is a waste.
Though, for the sake of argument, here's several more questions:
This reeks of a sci-fi novel.
And a bad one, at that.
Originally posted by johnlear
I appreciate your participation but I would respectfully suggest a modicum of courtesy. Should you be able to find it within yourself to pose your questions without framing them as a venomous attack I would be happy to answer them to the best of my ability.