Infrared Moon Images, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 24 times


reply posted on 7-8-2007 @ 11:16 PM by Quasar
Well, here's something interesting.

From
HubbleSite

The color composite in the lower right focuses on the 26-mile-diameter (42-kilometer-diameter) Aristarchus impact crater, and employs ultraviolet- to visible-color-ratio information to accentuate differences that are potentially diagnostic of ilmenite- (i.e, titanium oxide) bearing materials as well as pyroclastic glasses.


From Galleries.com


It crystallizes out of a magma relatively early before most of the other minerals. As a result, the heavier crystals of ilmenite fall to the bottom of the magma chamber and collect in layers. It is these layers that constitute a rich ore body for titanium miners.


Titanium miners, huh. This is on the same page:

Since that time, titanium has been shown to be a strong aluminum-like metal; light weight, non-corrosive, able to withstand temperature extremes (especially its high melting point, 1800 degrees C) and it has good strength (as strong as steel and twice as strong as aluminum). Titanium alloys have found many applications in high tech airplanes, missiles, space vehicles and even in surgical implants.


How convenient. Is that part of what the Apollo missions saw? Which is why we don't go back?


reply posted on 8-8-2007 @ 07:05 AM by Spec01
I agree, that picture just didn't look right.
I did some fiddling and came up with this:


Bottom left: The area in and around the crater was different in colour, saturation and brightness from the surrounding ground.

It looks like freshly fallen snow in texture, more powdery and fine. Could it have been placed there? More likely it was shopped there. I put a small red outline around the area in question (potentially doctored). This red perimeter demarcates the 'feathering' area. it is on this line that a faded change occurs from the crater to it's surroundings. You length of the fade is almost uniform throughout. Which further suggests image manipulation. The thicker short red lines at the bottom show where blatant features ('ridges' etc) fade from full clarity to the 'soft' stuff.

Even a basic unsharp mask (main pic) picks up the blatant difference in ground texture and colour.

I'd love to see more pictures like this!

This pic just doesn't look right, though it may be.
Where there's smoke there's fire.


reply posted on 8-8-2007 @ 07:12 AM by Spec01
Even this pic from another angle further pushes my point.




Does it not look like a whole mess of dirt was put there? Note a higher ridge of soft dirt joining the two feature craters.

If there were a base there and there was suspicion, then any photos taken of the area would be known about well in advance allowing plenty of time to prepare.

The dirt looks 'placed'. it so different from everything else, hasn't had time to settle like it's surrounds.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



WWIII - USS Enterprise, a dying Legend to be the FALSE FLAG !! ??
  Posted 16 days ago with 64 member flags
A Gigantic Pyramid on Ocean Sea Floor in Bermuda Triangle?
  Posted 11 days ago with 45 member flags
"The Internal Working Components of One type of UFO".
  Posted 15 days ago with 37 member flags
A new find, is hollow Earth real?
  Posted 19 days ago with 34 member flags
The Argument that Fukushima Was Sabotaged
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags