How can I prove it? Very simply…
Are the landing gear up or down?
If the gear were up then there is no pod in the fairing area. If there was a pod attached to that area of the aircraft then the landing gear would not have been able to retract as the pod would have been in the way. So if the gear was up, there is absolutely no way that any pod was attached to the wing root fairing area of the aircraft. Period!!!
The pod comes in three section as all aircraft pods in that area. Usually the payload is in the front, the portion that is over the landing gear door is just fairing and has nothing in it. when the gear extends that portion of the pod, which is empty goes with it. It is actually a part of the door itself.The aft portion can have electronics or can be empty. To minimize the drag on any type of pod it has to extend the length of the wing root otherwise it would create unwanted turbulence.
As to the flash…
First off you have a small point of impact for a lot of energy, correct?
What ways are some methods of radiated energy? How about: Heat, Noise, light…That is not to mention that an aircraft builds up a electrical charge when flying, as its completed insolated from the ground.
All aircraft have extrremely efficient static wicks which eliminate all electrical charge instantly unless in clouds. And there were no clouds.
Oh, also guess what is in the nose of that aircraft?
Something like this:
![]()
You have any idea how much microwave radiation that thing is putting out?
Ever see what happens to tinfoil when you put it in a microwave?
(For the kiddies at home, don’t try it).
It was a clear day, there would have been no reason to turn the radar on.
But hey, thanks for the input. We always appreciate the latest scuttlebutt from the ramp coffee shop.



