Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Intrepid, well.... If you argue from a liberal standpoint, and believe me, the whole "we have a right to burn the flag" is a very liberal standpoint
of view, then you are likely to get labeled as such. It really doesn't matter to me if he's liberal or not, I am just making the statement that
going by his whole "feelings" argument
[edit on 30-7-2007 by SpeakerofTruth]
first, ninthaxis, he knows full well it is covered under freedom of speech. he is just trying to justify the crap that he has said about the
'creature' that tried to burn it....just like the 'it is illegal to burn something in public cop out'....just trying to justify it...
i am not a liberal, consavertave, or anything..so from here on out, you can know that i argue not from on of those standpoints, but mine....does it
fall in line with liberal views? don't know, don't care.
i am not pc though so you can drop that jazz now.
i don't see how the right to burn it can be looked at it from ANY standpoint. we are in fact allowed, under the law to do such a thing....the
'feelings' come into play when people like you get so bunged up over it cause you attach some meaning to it, that you want to refer to them as
creatures, say they whould be phycically harmed, saying you'd take his flag to or saying 'better not do it front of me'....
you guys have the right to be all torn up over it...
just like everyone else says round these parts, what are you doing about this? it bothers you SO much that you don't care if a guy catches a
fist....are you writing your lawmakers telling them that you don't think it should be allowed or what?
i'm thinking you're just belly aching on here, tossing out some small names, being all bunged up over it cause YOU feel a certain way about
it.....
that is YOUR problem....that dude is/was in the right....
you're not.....thats the way it is..
