It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pavil
Huh? I assume you are referring to Afghanistan and Iraq. How was taking out the Taliban and going after A.Q. in Afghanistan was not in America's best interest?
Originally posted by pavilThey provided sanctuary for A.Q. and let them plot and execute the 9/11 attacks and would not give them up after 9/11.
Originally posted by pavilWhat would you have done on Sept. 12, 2001?
Originally posted by pavilOne sided Pacifism is a sure ticket to getting yourself killed in an incorrectly judged situation. Taking down the Taliban and going after A.Q and it's supporters in the world is the right course of action IMO.
Originally posted by pavilOn Iraq, in a Post 9/11 world, Saddam's regime would continue to pose problems for us.
Originally posted by pavilTaking him down caused Libya to fess up and stop it's WMD programs as well, was that a bad thing in your eyes?
Originally posted by pavilHistory will judge if it was a right or wrong decision to take Iraq's government down preemptively , way too early to definitively reach a conclusion yet. I know people with short attentions spans expect things to be wrapped up and pretty within a few years, but this will take time if it is to succeed.
Originally posted by pavilI know people with short attentions spans expect things to be wrapped up and pretty within a few years, but this will take time if it is to succeed.
Originally posted by Now_Then
I’m thinking if this is the case it's more likely to be a dirty bomb than a full on nuke blast. I say this because the massive amounts of dead would not be in their favour. A dirty bomb would have enough dead in the initial event, cause the wide spread fear and 'please lead us baaaa' feeling among the people, and lastly the big increases in long term illnesses like cancer - for which they can develop drugs and cures for, then dangle them in front of the people like a very expensive carrot. You guys over there don’t have an NHS like us over here.
And that just put another unsavoury thought in me noggin - the NHS is always walking a tightrope - a dirty bomb campaign over here would prob push it over the edge in time as all the after effects come to light.
The Taliban were overthrown, A.Q. was hit hard and displaced from their sanctuary therea and forced into hiding. Overall it was successful. Using Afghan troops at Tora Bora, was a critical mistake, done maninly to avoid U.S. Casualties that the public (really Congress) wouldn't stomach. IMO we shoud have sent in our best units and done whatever was necessary to trap and destroy those at Tora Bora. We also should have set up a net of Troops at the Afghan/ Paki border where we would have anticipated them to retreat. Political considerations on troop casualties went ahead of sound Military decisions at Tora Bora.
Originally posted by Lamâshtu
while i (grudgingly) have to admit that going after al-qaeda and/or taliban *could* have worked out ... the way this war was conducted was (and is) conducted is a farce.
which is what the pakistani tribal areas are doing now,
taliban is not down (while a-q admittedly is, but there's a heavy price paid seeing what is happening everywhere else in the world). going to a war and not doing it right - right meaning a plan for 10+ years in such a situation, including not only military but all around planning, not this slacking # - is worse than not going to war IMO.
history will especially judge if it was right to start these wars *without a goddamn long term vision
Originally posted by Lamâshtu
agreed on that, but a long attention span needs to take into account things passed in the last 50 years, not only the things that might happen after an illusory "start from scratch" (which just doesn't exist in politics anyway).
This is one of the reasons why I do NOT like ATS. Pseudo-economists, many of whom do not know much about economics at all foretell "crashes" because their conspiracy sites tell them of one. Will there be a huge recession? I don't doubt it. Will there be a crash so devastating that we will all be living on the streets eating out of garbage cans where the military will be our only option? Where the HELL did you get that? State some proof except from your own imaginings.
There are ways now that protect the economy from 1929-1930's conditions.
I know our economy is in trouble and has been very badly mishandled, but your exaggerations are not needed.If you look through the past 30 years there have been big problems with inflation, unemployment and recessions and stock "crashes" (1980's, 2001). People lost everything, and it was a scary time, but we didn't have to eat out of garbage cans and live in card board boxes.
I would only have liked to see what you would have said during those times...that is if you were even old enough to have intelligent conversations.
Originally posted by noangels2006
Afganistan is the forgotten war,and bloody well illegal too!Amazes me that we rational people of the world who far outweigh any blinkered warmongers in numbers cant do anything to bring Bush,Blair and co to justice!
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
Who among the 6 billion+ people in this world beside you is saying that it's illegal?
EVERY country in the world would have rightly done the same thing.
Originally posted by RetinoidReceptor
This is one of the reasons why I do NOT like ATS. Pseudo-economists, many of whom do not know much about economics at all foretell "crashes" because their conspiracy sites tell them of one. Will there be a huge recession? I don't doubt it. Will there be a crash so devastating that we will all be living on the streets eating out of garbage cans where the military will be our only option? Where the HELL did you get that? State some proof except from your own imaginings.
As New Zealand monetary reformer William Hugh McGunnigle wrote recently on an internet discussion site, “Basically today we are attempting to run a 21st century economy using financial tools that are five centuries out of date. It is like trying to control a sophisticated modern jumbo jet using the control mechanisms appropriate to the machines of World War I. The whole system is unstable, and the larger it becomes the more likely it is that it will collapse, simply because those controlling it have no inclination to prevent that collapse. We have learned nothing from the financial disaster of 1929-1934.”
The U.S. current account deficit, they point out, continues to plunge, heading toward the $900 billion mark, almost nine percent of GDP. U.S. household debt as a percentage of personal income has shot up almost thirty-five percent since 2000. While real income stagnates for the U.S. middle class, asset and commodity prices are surging, with gasoline prices leading the way and the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index doubling since 2001. Financing in the business world is increasingly shaky, with loans to companies with “junk” credit ratings soaring from under $50 billion a year in 2001 to over $200 billion in 2006.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Seems people who do know of economics are announcing some serious days ahead retinoid.
Sorry, but this is not a brilliant statement. We can stop the next and the next and the next. WE ARE THE PEOPLE OF THE USA AND WE WANT FREEDOM AND DEMAND IT.
Originally posted by Project_Silo
Impeachment may stop this administrations efforts to be a dictator but i doubt it will stop the next.Because if you truly believe in the nwo and truly believe they are so powerfull then the next president will surely be nwo.
Originally posted by RetinoidReceptor
I took all my money out of the stock market around 1.5 months ago because I think it is due for a major correction and is going to tank soon.
My problem is with your enormous exaggerations (and others on here) to paint "vivid" pictures in people's minds because you read it on some site or another that it shall be this way or that.
That is the beef I have with you and others on here.
By the way...globalresearch? Don't make me laugh. If you find something on the economist, cnbc, bloomberg then post it.