It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lamâshtu
Originally posted by greatlakes
Also I strongly think that it could also just be one person, not affiliated to any of the above. Possibly someone in the industry, the hoax (if a hoax) is not all that elaborate and far from perfect, many errors, bad writing, holes in the story etc. One industrious person 1 week maybe 2 weeks at a minimum to produce this stuff.
which is a lot. i'm still on the fence tending to hoax, or hoax inside a hoax, but all this makes less sense to me by the minute.
Again, I think you are either part of, or in on this Isaac fiasco.
Lex
Originally posted by 11 11
I fixed the words, so people would understand...
Originally posted by 11 11
I fixed the words, so people would understand...
Originally posted by wildone106
Dont start telling them your an artist, they will wanna see your birth certificate and every school/college you went to since birth. Besides..I tried them that pages ago..they will ignor any expert opinions..
Originally posted by Lamâshtu
1-2 weeks being a lot as in i don't think a single person could have pulled this of - if yes, then all my hats off and congratulations for a real nice hoaxer craftmanship. i really think that some of the stuff (like the language diagrams) are very nice from an artistic viewpoint, and in general you would have needed:
Originally posted by 11 11
I fixed the words, so people would understand...
Originally posted by chunder
As I have said 20 pages back, if you have concrete proof any picture could only have been created through CGI and no other means then be happy to see it.
Originally posted by 11 11
Originally posted by pjslug
I love these CGI people. If they saw a flying saucer 20 feet above their heads, they would still scream "Hoax! Hoax! It's a Hoax!"
This proves you have absolutly no clue what you are talking about. I believe in UFO's and have caught 1 or 2 on my camera. I am a firm believer in life outside of Earth.
But the ISAACCARET images are CGI! That means everything on the ISAACCARET website is a hoax. I have clearly pointed out 4+ explinations and PROOF of CGI, and you unexperianced blind people STILL dont acknowledge it..
Every proof of CGI I have put out, the only answer I have see from you people are wild guesses, and fictional explainations that "this is alien craft it could defy laws of light". You people are actually trying to tell me these renders are REAL. LOL!!!!!!!!
isaaccaret.fortunecity.com...
If you truely beleive the above image is of a real object, then God help you. You are going to believe every piece of crap that comes out from a 3D rendering software.
Originally posted by greatlakes
Coke and Hotpockets go a long way dude!
Originally posted by pjslug
By the majority of light coming from the bottom quadrant of that photograph, what would lend anyone to believe that the light source was high enough above the object to cast a shadow on itself like 1111 is claiming? Again I say the sun is coming from the same direction as the arm itself, and nothing in that photograph would lend towards an otherwise decision regarding the shadows. The lighting is perfectly conducive to the relative position of the sun on the horizon.