New Video: september clues exposes 911 TV Fakery, page 17

I'm not ready or willing to endorse or debunk this TV Fakery angle yet, but as heated a debate as this is, have you watched the videos bsregistration and others have put up? They are actually pretty interesting. I hesitate to use the word compelling here given the angry reactions, but they are interesting none the less.
livevideo.com...
video.google.com...

I think it's ironic that a conspiracy forum membership like ATS is more than willing to allow discussion of the "No Planes" theory, page after page after page, and yet we aren't at all willing to openly discuss the only feasible method by which this theory would be made possible.

Open your mind and indulge the theory for just a moment and look into it...
They wouldn't have needed to control every camera in NY, it isn't about controlling cameras at all, in this case, it's about digital alteration of delayed live feed. Digital technology makes things like this entirely possible, indeed we see it every day in sporting events and even your local news broadcasts.
As to the amatuer footage recorded by hundreds of witnesses to the event, how much of that amatuer footage have you actually seen that came straight from the sources showing the impacting aircraft? Straight form the source, that's crucial. Remember, for instance, that Abraham Zapruder was an amatuer photographer on the scene during the JFK assasination and Time Life held his film for years before it was ever released to the public and we all know what a debacle that was.
The one point made in the octopus video that I found very interesting was the nose of the 'plane' does emerge from the other side of the building exactly the same size and shape as when it entered, of course as earlier in this thread we learned that these planes are built with Super Aluminum, I guess that's entirely possible in a world where Aluminum Sheeting trumps steel beams.
While I'm not saying that it was, yeah it very well could have been faked, the technology exsisted to make it possible, there is a legitmate motive to garner public support for military operations in Afghanistan (UNOCAL was lobbying Congress that year to literally bomb Afghanistan into compliance with the pipeline deal that the Taliban had just backed out of for example), and the media isn't as independent as alot of folks would like to think it is. They get their feeds and footage from the same sources many times, and as we found shortly after 9-11, those sources are sometimes Uncle Sam himself (simply search ATS for "Fake News" and see for yourself).
Two cruise missles, planted demolitions in the two towers and WTC 7, and a little digital magic would be all it took really. It's not impossible to fake something on television at all, I'd go so far as to say it happens on a daily basis in some form or fashion.
Ah but the witnesses said this and the witnesses said that... You know when John Lennon was shot, one of the first witnesses that was interviewed by reporters gave America their first details of the event. His name escapes me at the moment, but we find out later that the guy they interviewed wasn't even on the scene when it happened, he was something like two blocks away but there he was on ABC news telling America what he 'saw' happen. Many of the witnesses of the 9-11 events reported explosions in the basement just before the planes impacted, many of them saw planes with no windows, many of them saw no planes, just the resulting explosions. Which witnesses are we to believe, and which ones are we to dismiss?
I don't think we should rule out any possibility, at any point, until we are certain, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that we know what happened that day. You guys may be dismissing this out of hand, and missing something very important in the name of protecting your own perceptions.
Bush said he saw the first plane hit, we know that was impossible if he was reading Goat Stories.Perhaps this fruedian slip meant he saw the dailies for the animation of the planes or something.

It's a theory mind you, but if you have an extra hour and 40 minutes some day, here's a possible motive...
video.google.com...

Here's a possible (IMO Probable) method...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...

They've done it before, and fairly recently, take a look at this page for a few examples...
www.cuttingedge.org...

I'm not endorsing the idea but faking the 9-11 television coverage would certainly fit nicely into place here. And it wouldn't be as hard to pull off as many here seem to think it would be.

Remember this girl?

Fictional movie yeah, but it really is that easy to fake the news, and they certainly have no compunctions about doing it for real either...
www.google.com...