It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The Parallelogram
The presence or absence of a smell at a given time and place cannot (as I am sure you will agree) be proven later, in court, except through the anecdotal evidence of involved parties.
The ruling was wrong, and will be overturned by the SCOTUS.
I disagree, and object to your use of the term "wrong" to describe an issue that is clearly not reducible to binary logic. We will see what the court thinks later.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
We,, I guess the phrase isn't limited to fascism, but definitely the words of someone who places individual rights and freedoms to a lower than the governments desire to invade.
So no, I didn't call you a fascist, necessarily.
And yes, this debate is about pot, and not about a sense of smell.
"The aroma of marijuana must be accompanied by some evidence that the suspects are disposing of the evidence, as opposed to casually consuming it," Justice Ronald Nehring wrote for the majority.
This ruling is limited to marijuana, and doesn't extend beyond that. You an't casually consume a body, or a meth lab.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
JM,
Doesn't a meth lab smell different than the smell of smoked meth? I've never actually smelled either, but I'm sure a meth lab has a symphony of smells from all of the different chemicals used.
Originally posted by jsobecky
"The aroma of marijuana must be accompanied by some evidence that the suspects are disposing of the evidence, as opposed to casually consuming it," Justice Ronald Nehring wrote for the majority.
This ruling is limited to marijuana, and doesn't extend beyond that. You an't casually consume a body, or a meth lab.
The judge was wrong, and so are you. It isn't the first time, nor will it be the last.
Originally posted by JamesMcMahn
Originally posted by jsobecky
"The aroma of marijuana must be accompanied by some evidence that the suspects are disposing of the evidence, as opposed to casually consuming it," Justice Ronald Nehring wrote for the majority.
This ruling is limited to marijuana, and doesn't extend beyond that. You an't casually consume a body, or a meth lab.
The judge was wrong, and so are you. It isn't the first time, nor will it be the last.
I was wondering what you meant exactly.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
And Jso....
I'll admit that I've been wrong before, but not this time. If you want cops to waste their time every time they catch a subtle whiff of herb, then by all means. But remember, doing that wouldn't allow for much time hunting down the big bad terrorists, or anti-americans now would it.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
And Jso....
I'll admit that I've been wrong before, but not this time. If you want cops to waste their time every time they catch a subtle whiff of herb, then by all means. But remember, doing that wouldn't allow for much time hunting down the big bad terrorists, or anti-americans now would it.
No, and all those fascists would also get away with murder, wouldn't they, Ras?
Originally posted by df1
Originally posted by Infoholic
but to the children.
Every time some joker wants to take away individual rights he will parade out "the children". When ever this happens I immediately know that the argument presented is pure hogwash that can not be supported by logic or reason.
Originally posted by The Parallelogram
Originally posted by jsobecky
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
And Jso....
I'll admit that I've been wrong before, but not this time. If you want cops to waste their time every time they catch a subtle whiff of herb, then by all means. But remember, doing that wouldn't allow for much time hunting down the big bad terrorists, or anti-americans now would it.
No, and all those fascists would also get away with murder, wouldn't they, Ras?
what?
You have voted The Parallelogram for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have one more vote left for this month.
Originally posted by carnival_of_souls2047
Originally posted by df1
Originally posted by Infoholic
but to the children.
Every time some joker wants to take away individual rights he will parade out "the children". When ever this happens I immediately know that the argument presented is pure hogwash that can not be supported by logic or reason.
I completely agree. It's circular logic and undebatable. I would much rather see violent criminals being handled than people in the privacy of their own home being arrested for toking at home. Sad state of affairs.
[edit on 15-3-2007 by carnival_of_souls2047]
Originally posted by NoobieDoobieDo
It'd be a stupid idea to make pot legal and then tax it so the US could make an extra billion or three a year INSTEAD of losing money.
Originally posted by NoobieDoobieDo
\Perhaps you are aware that there is a HUGE collection of politicians, judges (including federal), lawyers and presidents WORLDWIDE who all agree that marijuana should be decriminalized.
But anyways - let's keep locking up those blasted dope smokers. Murder and rape isn't that big a deal anyhow.
[edit on 16-3-2007 by NoobieDoobieDo]