It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JamesMcMahn
Originally posted by NoobieDoobieDo
\Perhaps you are aware that there is a HUGE collection of politicians, judges (including federal), lawyers and presidents WORLDWIDE who all agree that marijuana should be decriminalized.
But anyways - let's keep locking up those blasted dope smokers. Murder and rape isn't that big a deal anyhow.
[edit on 16-3-2007 by NoobieDoobieDo]
The group that supports dicriminalization is very much in the minority.
We do lock up every Murderer, Rapist, and Drug dealer we can. It take a while to get evience on rape and murders cases.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Now, JM, would that same smell be perceived if someone were just smoking meth? Again, I've never done it myself, or cooked it in a lab, so I'm really curious.
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Now, JM, would that same smell be perceived if someone were just smoking meth? Again, I've never done it myself, or cooked it in a lab, so I'm really curious.
Not admiting use here but from my experience meth doesn't really smell at all when smoked. If it does it's usually a mild kinda sweet smell, not like chemical at all... JM is wrong...
(most ppl don't smoke it anyway)
Originally posted by JamesMcMahn
I was talking about the lab smell. Not the smell of meth itself.
Originally posted by JamesMcMahn
Similar but not a strong.
Originally posted by JamesMcMahn
The group that supports dicriminalization is very much in the minority.
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by JamesMcMahn
The group that supports dicriminalization is very much in the minority.
Does this not fly in the face of democracy? Does this not violate people rights? How do you feel busting someone who uses marijuana to help them with their medical problems?
Just curious because as a cop you are forced to agree with ALL laws and enforce them, right? This leaves no room for your own thoughts to develop beyond what you have volunteered to except without question, right?
Originally posted by enjoies05
Well duh, why would a house that smells like marijuana have marijuana in it?
Originally posted by Orwells Ghost
It's a step in the right direction. The United States really need to ease up on it's draconian Marijuana laws.
Originally posted by shots
Why should a home be any different then a car? I do believe one state supreme court already ruled that is was legal for police to search cars if they suspected possession based on what the officers smelled.
Originally posted by shots
That will not change the fact we have laws that make its use illegal,, that you have to live with. Where and why those laws were enacted is not relevant simply because the laws are now in place and have to be enforced.
Originally posted by LostSailor
Originally posted by shots
Where and why those laws were enacted is not relevant simply because the laws are now in place and have to be enforced.
No... They don't. There are thousands of laws in the U.S. that aren't enforced.
Originally posted by rocknroll
And I disagree, it's not a hallucinogen. I think it's in it's own class. No other chemical produces the same mellow. euphoric feeling on this planet. It's not a hard drug at all.
Originally posted by Shoktek
This ruling is surprising, but I think a good one.
Originally posted by nazgarn
This has prolly been stated before - but if they are SMOKING the marijuana then there are technically disposing of it?!
Originally posted by souls
edit=for the record, girls do get naked and run around like that when they smoke in real life.
Originally posted by Shoktek
The founding fathers didn't realize though that laws would be changed and altered in any way possible in the future in order to take these rights away.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Somebody care to answer these questions? Remember, this topic is not about pot!
Q1: You roll your own cigarettes. A cop stops you for a traffic violation and sees a stub in your ashtray. It looks just like a roach.
Probable cause?
Q2: My point is, you're taking away one of the 5 senses as a discovery mechanism.
What's next, taking away sight, because not everybody has 20-20 vision?
Originally posted by Ambient Sound
...they should not be able to base their actions on "evidence" that cannot be reproduced on demand and the recognition of which is highly subjective.
Originally posted by Matt_Mulder
Waow, the U.S. are going easy on drugs...haha. Keep aware, cause someday they'll send cops to check if your cooking is not too burnt !
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Yeah shots,
To me it looks like people can pick and choose which statistics they believe and disbelieve. And both sides seem to be doing the same thing.
Originally posted by Lexion
The Admin, if I'm not mistaken, has a responsibility to report these claims
to the proper authorities, and make the IP addresses known.
Originally posted by Frank Black
I disagree.......if my pursuit of my happiness includes something that does not infringe upon your rights it is no buisness of the authorities to tell me what to do with my body. What you are implying is the equivalent to saying that the cops can arrest me for treating my body poorly.
Originally posted by JamesMcMahn
I am sorry if you view me as a bad guy, but in the academy they teach you that allot of times you are protecting others from themselves, its part of the job.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
A government that criminalizes good citizens for no damn reason is corrupt to the core, and quite clearly afraid of the very people who empower the system.
Originally posted by jsobecky
And what's with this "Remember guys" crap? I was there long before you were, pal. I grew up in the 60/70's, and loved every minute of it. So don't make any assumptions. You know nothing about me.
Originally posted by JamesMcMahn
Would apply this if the officer was there for another reason like serving a warrant or checking a complaint.
Originally posted by JamesMcMahn
The departments there need to learn to use the "blanket party system" that helps fix corrupt cops.
Originally posted by jsobecky
The judge was wrong, and so are you. It isn't the first time, nor will it be the last.
Originally posted by shots
This ruling could be a set back for law enforcement agencies around the US. Up until now police were allowed under probable cause to search vehicles, now drug dealers and users will be able to get away. It is s shame.
www.sltrib.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by enjoies05
Well duh, why would a house that smells like marijuana have marijuana in it?
Originally posted by tsloan
It's not an issue any more in Utah...? Problem solved
Originally posted by enjoies05
Well duh, why would a house that smells like marijuana have marijuana in it?