It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Actually, it's more like trying to find a needle in a needlestack. Anyone who refers to THE Antichrist as though there's only one unique singular being, is misguided. In my opinion.
The Antichrist will be a "convinced spiritualist" Soloviev says, an admirable philanthropist, a committed, active pacifist, a practicing vegetarian, a determined defender of animal rights
(emphasis -Rren)
In this the "Historical" interpretation, the antichrist was clearly not merely a single individual, it was a system of apostasy and persecution that would hold sway for over twelve centuries. The inevitable conclusion of those who studied these prophesies in scripture, before and during the Protestant Reformation, was that there was only one entity that fit all the above characteristics: the papal dynasty of the Roman Catholic Church.
Ribera proposed that the first few chapters of the Apocalypse applied to ancient pagan Rome, and the rest he limited to a yet future period of 3 1/2 literal years, immediately prior to the second coming.
[...]
So, according to Ribera, the 1260 days and 42 months and 3 1/2 times of prophecy were not 1260 years, but a literal 3 1/2 years, and therefore none of the book of Revelation had any application to the middle ages or the papacy, but to the future, to a period immediately prior to the second coming, hence the name Futurism. Ribera's work is available for study at the James White Library* in Michgan.
Originally posted by kenshiro2012
I agree with you! I am of the belief that the Anti-Christ will be more of a political / conglomerate or even a multi-national entity than just a single person. I could be wrong but to me that makes more sense.
Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time. 1John 2:18
Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. 1John 2:22
And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that [spirit] of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. 1John 4:3
For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. 2John 1:17
Originally posted by yeahright
Let's try a little exercise here since the term "Antichrist" is scriptural, i.e. pertaining to the Bible, in nature. What does the Bible say about antichrist?
From the King James Version English Concordance-
Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time. 1John 2:18
Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. 1John 2:22
And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that [spirit] of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. 1John 4:3
For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. 2John 1:17
And there you go. Four references. Any of that sound like it's referring to an individual? It doesn't to me.
Discuss among yourselves...
[Edit for typo]
[edit on 3/1/2007 by yeahright]
Originally posted by QuasiShaman
More ignornance, killing, wars, oppression......anything and everything evil has come from the Christianity and Catholicism.
Originally posted by reaganero
the idea of the antichrist has been applied to the beasty type thing in revelations. it's just a simplified way of describing him. everybody understands by now that if you reference the term "antichrist" it refers to the act of being against christ as a savior. so from here on out let's just understand that the bible does refer to a person who will be the "great deceiver" and we can call him/her/it the antichrist for the point of debate.
Originally posted by kenshiro2012
Originally posted by QuasiShaman
More ignornance, killing, wars, oppression......anything and everything evil has come from the Christianity and Catholicism.
WOW! Then I take it that Christianity even predates the Bible and has been a world influence since before the Neaderthals!
Incredible piece of reasoning! Let's deny all of history and lump all the blame on Christians.
Ignorance Denied!
[edit on 1-3-2007 by kenshiro2012]
Originally posted by yeahright
Originally posted by reaganero
the idea of the antichrist has been applied to the beasty type thing in revelations. it's just a simplified way of describing him. everybody understands by now that if you reference the term "antichrist" it refers to the act of being against christ as a savior. so from here on out let's just understand that the bible does refer to a person who will be the "great deceiver" and we can call him/her/it the antichrist for the point of debate.
That's fine, you can do as you like. But calling a duck an eagle doesn't make it one. IMO, if people are going to attempt to ascertain the meaning behind scripture, it's vital to have a clear understanding of the terms being referenced. Lucifer, Satan, The Beast, The Deceiver, antichrist, are not interchangable terms if you have any hope of comprehending the message.
But it's a futile exercise at best in these situations, and as I said, discuss among yourselves. I should've stayed out of it.
Originally posted by infinite
EKKKK!!!!
I am a vegetarian! does that mean that I am the Antichrist that walks among us?
best stop reading my bible at night now
What are you talkin bout Willis?
90 some % of the wars, murder and ignorance has come directly from religion. I'm sure Neandrathals had battles and wars, but were based soley on survival if anything. Not religious prrsecution!? Prove me wrong!
More ignornance, killing, wars, oppression......anything and everything evil has come from the Christianity and Catholicism.
Originally posted by jbondo
Gore was first in my mind also but the antichrist is supposed to come from Europe.
As for being frightened, as a Christian the only thing that frightens me is the number of people not saved.
As always, this is my belief and everyone has a right to believe what they wish.
Originally posted by kenshiro2012
Back to the subject at hand, I tend to beleive that the anti-christ (in what ever form) is alive today. To me it seems that the world's situation is walking straight into his hands.
[edit on 1-3-2007 by kenshiro2012]