 |
|
Topic started on 26-2-2007 @ 03:02 PM by r4758
|
     
video.google.ca...
In the middle of this video, the BBC reporter is discussing the collapse of building 7, meanwhile, building 7 can be seen clearly in the background
still standing!!!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2007 @ 03:11 PM by tator3
|
VIDEO DOWN AGAIN!!!...I seen it. Very good. Download original from Video Archive at
ia311517.us.archive.org...
ia331340.us.archive.org...
ia301330.us.archive.org...
ia331327.us.archive.org...
ia311517.us.archive.org...
BEFORE THEY TAKE THIS LINK DOWN ..... By the way, this is a 1g file broken up into 5 parts. Pretty large.
[edit on 26-2-2007 by tator3]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2007 @ 03:13 PM by bsbray11
|
Dunno, I keep getting this:
Did the footage have a clock or any kind of time-stamp on it?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2007 @ 03:14 PM by mister Jones
|
i was just gonna post this, just finished watching the video.
Pretty damning stuff. The newswoman is literally talking about WTC7 collapsing while you can actually see the building behind her standing strong...
WTF??
Why did the BBC news open with the collapse of the building 20+mins BEFORE the actual collapse? Did someone send out a press release a bit too early?
Funny that they took her off the air just a few mins before the building was gonna collapse (for real this time).
I wonder how this will be debunked.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2007 @ 03:16 PM by tator3
|
The woman is reporting building 7 also has collapsed while the building is in the live background still...minutes before the building really comes
down, the live feed mysteriously goes out and back to bbc world news desk where the newscaster says "we seem to have lost her".
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2007 @ 03:23 PM by XPhiles
|
Originally posted by tator3
the live feed mysteriously goes out and back to bbc world news desk where the newscaster says "we seem to have lost her". 
we seem to have lost the google video link ??
I'm not going download a 1g file...  maybe someome will post another link..
[edit on 26-2-2007 by XPhiles]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2007 @ 03:24 PM by Chicagofreedomfighter
|
Skip to 4min, and 15min respectfully
[edit on 26-2-2007 by Chicagofreedomfighter]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2007 @ 03:26 PM by tator3
|
Get the story out...digg it!!!
Here's stills of video and great information about video...Thankyou Alex Jones
prisonplanet.com...
[edit on 26-2-2007 by tator3]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2007 @ 03:34 PM by 11Bravo
|
I can view it now, but I cannot download it.
This is a curious anomaly, one of hundreds, but I dont think it is damning evidence.
It would be too easy to fake something like this IMO.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2007 @ 03:45 PM by Chicagofreedomfighter
|
Originally posted by 11Bravo
I can view it now, but I cannot download it.
This is a curious anomaly, one of hundreds, but I dont think it is damning evidence.
It would be too easy to fake something like this IMO. 
Fake what?
the fact that the female reporter is verbally confirming the collapse while its stands burning behind her obviously standing INTACT??
I’m sorry I’m confused as to which part of this is "easily faked"
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2007 @ 03:48 PM by tator3
|
This coverage comes directly from BBC Video Archives. Original can be downloaded directly from the archives.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2007 @ 03:50 PM by andy1033
|
did anyone actually record bbc news that day, and actually record all this. people need to make sure it is what it looks like.
did anyone actually record bbc 24 news that day.
we need to find someone that actually recorded this.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2007 @ 03:58 PM by Spawwwn
|
what are you talking about??? this video proves NOTHING. the guy writes some text and says "this is what time they were saying it" there's no way
to prove what he's saying is true. Yet again a great example of truthers doing anything to make their point.
don't belive this video...it can't be verified or confirmed AT ALL.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2007 @ 04:00 PM by Rotator
|
If i remember correctly the bbc quickly corrected their story regarding the time of the collapse of wtc 7. I think they offered the excuse that it was
another building that had collapsed just before 5 oclock.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2007 @ 04:03 PM by Chicagofreedomfighter
|
Originally posted by tator3
This coverage comes directly from BBC Video Archives. Original can be downloaded directly from the archives. 
From my understanding "somebody" has done there best to get this video no pun intended "pulled" from every respected video site on the web.
So far its confirmed that its original source was the BBC Archives, which it is no longer avail at, it has been up and off of goolge for the last 4
hours its currently down
nothing on youtube as of yet, nor live leak.
I know people downloaded it and are trying to get it up on other non censored outlets.
If anyone comes across an active link post it ASAP!
I mean seriously in connection with the other evidence this could prove to be a monumental piece of footage, that documents the BBC was reading from a
pre written script on the events that day!!!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2007 @ 04:04 PM by darkbluesky
|
Originally posted by mister Jones
Why did the BBC news open with the collapse of the building 20+mins BEFORE the actual collapse? Did someone send out a press release a bit too early?
Funny that they took her off the air just a few mins before the building was gonna collapse (for real this time).
I wonder how this will be debunked. 
This way:
I think anyone would find it impossible to believe the BBC was in on the"caper".
Also you ask:
 Did someone send out a press release a bit too early? 
Who would that someone be? The 9-11 False Flag Public Relations officials?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2007 @ 04:05 PM by Agit8dChop
|
Having not seen the footage due to being at work
how do you know they wont just showing footage of the tower when it was 'standing' because they hadnt received the footage from it 'falling'
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2007 @ 04:07 PM by andy1033
|
Chicagofreedomfighter- you need ti have another source other than bbc archives. i know some actually recorded the news that day, like alex jones
records usa news 24 hours a day.
you need an independent source otherwise they can call it rubbish.
i am surprised prisonplanet does not put a warning in there page stating they need to get more sources of people that may of recorded that show.
this vid alone will not be enough for anything other than people not accepting it as evidence.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2007 @ 04:09 PM by Implosion
|
What is that damn 23 doing there?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2007 @ 04:10 PM by deessell
|
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Having not seen the footage due to being at work
how do you know they wont just showing footage of the tower when it was 'standing' because they hadnt received the footage from it 'falling'

Ha ha! Way to go mate -- I think you hit the nail on the head. As much as I don't believe the official truth, I think suggesting that the BBC had
prior knowledge is far fetched to say the least.
I also have not seen the footage.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |