BBC News Reports Building 7 collapse 23 Minutes before it collapses.

which leads back to the non-diversionary question of who sent them this information, as someone said before: "Find the entity that issued that press release and you have found someone who was in on the plan. Of course, no one in power or in the corporate content controlled media really wants a legitimate investigation into the 911 atrocity. It would force the question as to what the actual agenda is and reveal how utterly corrupt and conscienceless those is power actually are. "

I hope the media "was in on it" isn't going to be the argument being presented by debunkers whilst ignoring the more pertinent one (above).

I would agree with you except for one detail. For me, when I first sat and watched this footage, I was counting down to when we would actually see wtc 7 come down, but lo and behold the sat link went out, about a min or two before we should actually see the building come down behind the news anchor. A rather convenient coincidence.

Unless of course Ive missed some other detail in this thread.

the guy who bought the wtc buildings knew it was coming down - he said so in an interview ' he said 'he and the fd agreed to 'pull it' '
the whole thing stinks
and this guy made 5 big B$s on the Ins blood money
anyway - cut to the chase
it was a done deal by trusted entities that have all the power they need to smoke and mirror all their lies and continue to foster any emergency for their own corporate ends
anybody seen the pics of the thermite slant cuts on the tower bases?
I think the west has been hi jacked and this is just the tip
God help us all
pogo was right
we have found the enemy and he is us
y

It is amazing that there are still people who do not know that a 3rd World Trade Center skyscraper, 47 story WTC7, collapsed looking just like a planned demolition, and it wasn't even hit by an aircraft.

And there are still people who do not know that the BBC reported WTC7 had collapsed while it was still standing live behind the reporter Jane Standley, and it actually collapsed 23 minutes later; five minutes after somebody pulled Jane Standley's live feed.

Google Video Link

WTC7 is the Saloman Brothers building

reply to post by SPreston

---

No, what is amazing is that this thread is still alive. The news media makes mistakes on almost every "breaking news" story. This has been explained (with examples) multiple times, and yet people still think that the BBC saying the building had collapsed, when it had not, is some sort of proof of a big bad conspiracy.

While I do not have the BBC on tape, I DO have another network on tape from that day. And they were talking about how it was feared that WTC 7 was going to collapse at some point, and this went on until the building actually collapsed, no loss of link, no static, just one continuous transmission.

reply to post by Swampfox46_1999

---

except that this "mistake" was repeated by three separate news outlets on the same day.

Nice try though.

reply to post by Smack

---

How many news outlets used the bad AP report about Flight 93 that day? Heres a hint...it was more than one...

Remember the mining accident, where the dozen or so guys were trapped? EVERY network reported that eleven of them had been found alive....EVERY network.........and yet, the next morning we found out the truth, only one man was found alive.

On a big story, crap like that always happens. One network will report something, and next thing you know, it pops up on a couple others. They get in a hurry to scoop the competitors and run with something before it gets verified.

reply to post by Swampfox46_1999

---

I know. Don't you worry, Swampy. I'm sure all those coincidences can be explained away. You've done a masterful job so far in dismissing every single piece of evidence thrown your way.

I guess it was a common occurrence in the world pre 911 for buildings on fire to suddenly implode on themselves. That would explain how they were so sure that it would -- an hour before it actually did.

reply to post by Smack

---

Except...the buildings didnt implode, they collapsed due to severe damage and fire.

And, I dont dismiss actual evidence...altered youtube video, and ravings about dust residue dont count.

[edit on 26-4-2009 by Swampfox46_1999]