It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Uh, except that it all happened because of the driver's religion.
All you appeasers can't stand the fact that muslim cab driver attempted to kill his passengers because he felt they insulted his religion.
End of story. End of discussion...
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
I must be missing the part where his being Muslim needs to be mentioned.
He could be Jewish, or Christian
here who can't understand the difference between selective journalistic propaganda, and realit
They base their entire concept of things on what Fox and CNN tells them.
benevolent heretic
Why wasn't it because of the passengers' religions?
makeitso
you could contact the owner (Ahmed Abukar) of Unite d Cab Co. in and ask him some questions about his employee
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
The problem with that Luda, is because of their stirring of the $#!+ pot, you get people like Century21 here who can't understand the difference between selective journalistic propaganda, and reality. They base their entire concept of things on what Fox and CNN tells them.
Originally posted by Nygdan
benevolent heretic
Why wasn't it because of the passengers' religions?
Because he ran them over. He was the attacker.
Originally posted by centurion1211
And we get people here that will defend their religion and opinions at all costs, no matter how logically indefensible their opinion is.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
You miss my point. He didn't run over them because he's a Muslim. He ran over them because he's a criminal! They had a disagreement, yes. Over religion, yes.
But if the cabbie was white and the passengers were black, you wouldn't say, "He ran over them because he was white." You'd say, "he ran over them because of a racial disagreement."
I'm not even trying to be PC here, but making this about the cabbie's religion being Muslim instead of about a religious disagreement with a criminal just adds to the current feeling of bigotry toward Muslims in the world today.
If the cabbie was a Baptist and hit 2 Muslims, would you say, "He ran over them because he was a Baptist"?
Originally posted by centurion1211
And we get people here that will defend their religion and opinions at all costs, no matter how logically indefensible their opinion is.
That's right. Because some of us believe in the First Amendment.
Originally posted by centurion1211
No, I'm quite sure it would be you yelling out that he did it because he was white.
You're now claiming the muslim cab driver's got a 1st amendment right to run over people because they insulted his religion?
Originally posted by ludaChris
If you look at Fox News, theyre not worried about so the story as much as they are stirring controversy(i.e. getting higher ratings). Look at the O'Reilly factor, its an entertainment show more than it is a news show. He admits himself that he brings people on the show that will get things heated. Smart in my opinon, because who doesnt like to see O'Reilly and someone go at it, it splits my sides.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
The problem with that Luda, is because of their stirring of the $#!+ pot, you get people like Century21 here who can't understand the difference between selective journalistic propaganda, and reality. They base their entire concept of things on what Fox and CNN tells them.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
You miss my point. He didn't run over them because he's a Muslim. He ran over them because he's a criminal! They had a disagreement, yes. Over religion, yes. But if the cabbie was white and the passengers were black, you wouldn't say, "He ran over them because he was white." You'd say, "he ran over them because of a racial disagreement."
I'm not even trying to be PC here, but making this about the cabbie's religion being Muslim instead of about a religious disagreement with a criminal just adds to the current feeling of bigotry toward Muslims in the world today.
If the cabbie was a Baptist and hit 2 Muslims, would you say, "He ran over them because he was a Baptist"?
centurion1211
No, I'm quite sure it would be you yelling out that he did it because he was white.
You're now claiming the muslim cab driver's got a 1st amendment right to run over people because they insulted his religion?
jsobecky
He's still just a wacko with anger management problems.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
And with a name like Ibrahim Ahmed, I'm sure he's a Buddhist.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Yes and this guy ran over them because of a religious disagreement.
If he wasn't muslim, there wouldn't've been an issue,
What more is required for religious hate?
Yes, if they argued over religion right before it, I would.
I don't know if you know BH too well, but I very much suspect that that is NOT what she'd be saying.
She's saying that people are free to say whatever they want, and if they want to say that it wasn't over religion, they are entitled to do so.
Originally posted by centurion1211
And we get people here that will defend their religion and opinions at all costs, no matter how logically indefensible their opinion is.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
ps, If you're going to add a tag to a thread, please look it up if you're not sure how to spell it. Thanks.