Putin Orders Russian Military Forces To Attack US Forces During Iran Invasion????, page 2

IF (and thats a large IF) the spetznaz are there or will be deployed then there will be trobule - as they are VERY good , on par with the SAS which ranks them above the us sf troops

and now the argueing starts - that britisah and russian SF troops are better than USA ones , well , they are - you belittle the russian troops , but they are very very good.

nuclear

20 warheads would kill the usa

`amagade you talk BS` will be the reply - but yes all it would take is 20

all aimed at nuclear power stations.

look at chernobyl - the land is still very poisoned 20 years later and will be for many many years - the sort of crap that comes out of a power station like that cannot be easily cleaned up; there are isotopes which only occcur within controlled atomic power stations that don`t occur within bombs

Rocket sled testing at Eglin Air Force Base has demonstrated penetrations of 100 to 150 feet in concrete when traveling at 4,000 ft/s. The reason for this is liquefaction of the concrete in the target, which tends to flow over the projectile. Variation in the speed of the penetrator can either cause it to be vaporized on impact (in the case of traveling too fast), or to not penetrate far enough (in the case of traveling too slow). An approximation for the penetration depth is obtained with an impact depth formula derived by Sir Isaac Newton. Yet nuclear bunker busters are using a light penetrator to travel 15 to 30 meters through shielding, and detonate a nuclear charge there. Such an explosion would generate powerful shock waves, which would be transmitted very effectively through the solid material comprising the shielding.

Fallout from any nuclear detonation is increased with proximity to the ground. While a megaton-class yield will inevitably throw up many tons of (newly) radioactive debris, which falls back to the earth as fallout, critics contend that despite their relatively miniscule explosive yield, nuclear bunker busters create more fallout per kiloton yield.

The scientific group Union of Concerned Scientists points out that, at the Nevada Test Site, the depth required to contain fallout from an average-yield nuclear test was over 100 meters, depending upon the weapon's yield. They contend that it is improbable that penetrators could be made to burrow so deeply. With yields between 0.3 and 340 kilotons, they argue, it is unlikely the blast would be completely contained.

so in summary , using any type or class of nuclear device (small or large) either sub surface , surface or air burst would *probably* result in a response in kind.