Who's against the North American Union?, page 1

Guess what people. A resolution has been introduced in Congress, showing their discontent for the formation of the North American Union.

This link goes to the Government Printing Office Web Site, of which contains the official versions of Bills and Resolutions that are on the desks of our Congresspersons.

frwebgate.access.gpo.gov...:hc40ih.txt.pdf

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States
should not engage in the construction of a North American
Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway
System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico
and Canada.
source

Also, pay close attention to the Congresspersons that have introduced the Resolution to stop the formation of the North American Union. Your 2008 Presidential Nominee... Ron Paul.

Mr. GOODE (for himself, Mr. WAMP, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. PAUL,
Mr. STEARNS, Mr. DUNCAN, and Ms. FOXX) submitted the following concurrent
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation
and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign
Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in
each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction
of the committee concerned
source
additional source

Hooray!!


Write to these people to show your support. Write to your own Congress Representatives to urge them to support this Resolution.

[edit on 1/23/2007 by Infoholic]

Originally posted by Nygdan
Because there are paranoid, irrational people in congress. People don't need a good reason to put up something to a vote in congress.

OK... so you are telling me that SPP + S. 3622 = paranoid irrationalism? They might be in Congress, but there's plenty more where that came from. You are in denial, Nygdan.

Originally posted by Nygdan
So you say.

Beautiful debunking technique.

Originally posted by Nygdan

Hardly a means of dissolving the federal government? Ask each of the members of the European Union to compare their current rights as apposed to what it was before the E.U. was formed.

Again, this is a highway.

You are avoiding the point of that quote. The highway is going to be the main artery of connecting the three nations. It's more than just another highway. Again, ask each of the members of the European Union to compare their current rights as apposed to what it was before the E.U. was formed.

Originally posted by Nygdan

Dissolving the federal government? Do you honestly believe the United States Constitution will remain when the N.A.U. takes place?

There isn't going to BE an "NAU".

You're right, as long as someone (ya know, those paranoid irrationalists you say exist) does something about it.

Originally posted by Nygdan

k4rupt
This isn't a HUGE issue, but it definately is an issue.

Its not a huge issue, its an imaginary issue. There is no "NAU". People talk about security cooperation, and they scream "its the NAU". Twenty years ago it was "the UN superstate", 50 years ago it was "the NWO", and a few hundred years ago it was 'the illuminati', etc etc. Still, nothing happens. I wonder what the new formulation after the "NAU" will be? Looks like people are already worried about a 'global caliphate', maybe that will be it.

- Yes, it is a HUGE issue for every American citizen.

- And all these entities that people "screamed" about came true, did they not?

[edit on 1/23/2007 by Infoholic]

Originally posted by Infoholic
OK... so you are telling me that SPP + S. 3622 = paranoid irrationalism?

If you think that those bills equate to a 'North American Union", then yes. Its cooperation between nations, not dissolution of sovereign governments, not even unionization ala the EU.

They might be in Congress, but there's plenty more where that came from. You are in denial, Nygdan.

Because of google results for "north american union"?

Beautiful debunking technique.

Its entirely approrpriate in response to your 'bunk' technique. You have done nothign other than to say 'they want to build a highway' and 'they want to cooperate' and then claim it is proof of a plot against the federal government. You keep making claims, but you're not backing them up.

The highway is going to be the main artery of connecting the three nations. It's more than just another highway.

Its a highway that will allow shipping companies to have a more efficient and centralized package inspection and security procedure, and switfly move goods to their markets. If anything, its an expansion of American values into mexico and canada, not a suppression of free america.

Again, ask each of the members of the European Union to compare their current rights as apposed to what it was before the E.U. was formed.

Irrelevant.

You're right, as long as someone (ya know, those paranoid irrationalists you say exist) does something about it.

It is pointless to work against something that isn't even out there, its like elephant repellent.

And all these entities that people "screamed" about came true, did they not?

What? Not a single one of them did. The UN is NOT a superstate, its a weak, inept, sidelined, weak organization with no political teeth. There is no "NWO" ruling over us as a global dictatorship. The Illuminati Order fought for liberty and was destroyed by church and state autocrats, and last I checked, there last real caliphate was beaten and his empire over part of the middle east was torn apart.

Wow
The powers that be have been planning this for a long time Nygdan.

www.sweetliberty.org...
"new states constitution"
$25 million of your tax dollars were spent on its development.

The links that Infoholic provided show that our tax dollars are being spent in Mexico to improve roads,schools,and other infrastructure to shorten the economic gap between Mexico and the U.S and Canada.

And if no one is "advocating" a NAU where did all the fuss about the "Amero" come from?
www.humanevents.com...

I can't believe a mod here at ats would dismiss all of this so easily.

Originally posted by Nygdan
If you think that those bills equate to a 'North American Union", then yes. Its cooperation between nations, not dissolution of sovereign governments, not even unionization ala the EU.

- Yes, I think those bills equate to a N.A.U.
- It's cooperation between nations, in order to form a Union... in the long run.

Speaking of the Council on Foreign Relations... look at this Nygdan:

When the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States met in Texas recently they underscored the deep ties and shared principles of the three countries. The Council-sponsored Task Force applauds the announced “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America,” but proposes a more ambitious vision of a new community by 2010 and specific recommendations on how to achieve it.
Building a North American Community - Pay attention to the web page "title", Nygdan.

You tell me, Mr. Knows-all... what the hell does that mean? If not to form a Union under the guise of a "prosperity partnership", than what?

Originally posted by Nygdan
Because of google results for "north american union"?

That was used for you to be able to search and read on your own... to signify that it's more than these "paranoid, irrational people", let alone being in Congress.. but anywhere, and everywhere, as depicted by my "googled" source.

Originally posted by Nygdan
Its entirely approrpriate in response to your 'bunk' technique. You have done nothign other than to say 'they want to build a highway' and 'they want to cooperate' and then claim it is proof of a plot against the federal government. You keep making claims, but you're not backing them up.

Mmmkay.

Infoholic: "Nygdan, what's your name?"
Nygdan: "Nygdan."
Infoholic: "No it isn't."

Yes, Nygdan.... entirely appropriate.

Originally posted by Nygdan
Its a highway that will allow shipping companies to have a more efficient and centralized package inspection and security procedure, and switfly move goods to their markets. If anything, its an expansion of American values into mexico and canada, not a suppression of free america.

Expansion of values!!!???? What are you smokin!?

Here's an idea (one come up with by the "one's in power", not by me...

"Let's unite the U.S., Canada, and Mexico... We'll have them under the same "constitution" so that they alllll have to pay taxes to "us"."

Are you catching on........ yet?

Originally posted by Nygdan
Irrelevant.

Ask the question, Nygdan. It's not irrelevant, but to those that are apathetic to the future of our country. Yet again... "ask each of the members of the European Union to compare their current rights as apposed to what it was before the E.U. was formed."... It's relevant because they have already seen what will happen with the formation of another union. I'm willing to bet my ATS points on the fact that they lost freedoms.

Originally posted by Nygdan
It is pointless to work against something that isn't even out there, its like elephant repellent.

What!?!?!??! Are you suggesting that elephants don't exist!?!?!



They, those in power, don't want you to know. They want you to remain apathetic..... and.... they sure as the hell don't want you to stop what they are doing.

Originally posted by Nygdan
What? Not a single one of them did. The UN is NOT a superstate, its a weak, inept, sidelined, weak organization with no political teeth. There is no "NWO" ruling over us as a global dictatorship. The Illuminati Order fought for liberty and was destroyed by church and state autocrats, and last I checked, there last real caliphate was beaten and his empire over part of the middle east was torn apart.

So... the UN doesn't exist? The purpose behind the UN doesn't exist? As stated by Bush Sr.... it'll be here before you know it. The North American Union is but only a piece of the puzzle before the NWO can be put into full effect... "out of the closet".

The Illuminati? Go here: www.google.com...
I'm not going to do all the leg work for you, Nygdan.


The only thing you've been able to do to "debunk" the N.A.U. is support your own opinion with "Nope, it's never gonna happen, cause I said so. "

[edit on 1/24/2007 by Infoholic]

Believe there's no plans for a North American Union???

Then check this website:

Notice that it has a .gov designation meaning it is an official government site.

NAU site

This site covers joint negotiations with Canada and Mexico on internal and external (to North America) trade and defense issues.

Before commenting, I really suggest you read through this.

[edit on 1/24/2007 by centurion1211]

Alaska: Samantha Koenig Kidnapped last week.
  Posted 2 days ago with 111 member flags

Blue Spheres Fall from the Sky in the UK
  Posted 14 days ago with 81 member flags

The Chinese have seen the dragon in the sky !!
  Posted 1 days ago with 66 member flags

Strange Sounds in Sky Explained by Scientists
  Posted 11 days ago with 59 member flags

She Dialed 911. The Cop Who Came to Help Raped Her.
  Posted 4 days ago with 49 member flags

Anonymous: Revealing The Arcane Legal Trick Behind ACTA
  Posted 11 days ago with 42 member flags

NDAA Nullification: Tennessee Bills Propose Kidnapping Charges for Federal Agents
  Posted 2 days ago with 38 member flags

Anonymous reveals Haditha massacre emails | RT
  Posted 6 days ago with 33 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: