Who's against the North American Union?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 24-1-2007 @ 01:50 PM by Count
Originally posted by Infoholic
Yet again... "ask each of the members of the European Union to compare their current rights as apposed to what it was before the E.U. was formed."... It's relevant because they have already seen what will happen with the formation of another union. I'm willing to bet my ATS points on the fact that they lost freedoms.


I don't know if you're referring to the countries forming the EU or individuals, but as an individual living in an EU country, here's my 2 euro cents.

I voted for Finland to join the EU.

It may be true that we did lose some freedoms in the legislative sense, but in exchange we also gained some rights. Of course there are naysayers who have very protectionist attitudes and (for example) they don't like the idea of having a freely moving workforce who has a right to work in any member nation. I see that as a benefit. As a professional my job opportunities multiplied in an instant, and if that's not good, what is?

I also like the fact that I have chances to get my voice heard in broader venues than before. I can vote in local, national and EU elections - previously I could only vote in local and national elections. And it's not like we could ignore the other european countries back then - individually or nationally - but now every citizen has more ways and venues to use to try and change their surroundings more to their liking.

In my opinion the old phrase "United we stand, divided we fall" also applies to EU. Individually no country in Europe was able to match the economical and political power of USA, China etc. but EU has much better chances to play and succeed in that company.


reply posted on 24-1-2007 @ 06:41 PM by Vitchilo
Here's the report on the Amero being into all major banks in America ready for distribution.

My guest: Bush will talk about it next week when he'll talk about the state of the economy.



reply posted on 29-1-2007 @ 07:46 AM by Infoholic
Originally posted by Alexander1983
living in Canada i vote a No on this one


I'm sure a lot of people agree with you Alexander1983... but has anyone taken into context the idea that we are all going to be forced to fund this move toward a North American Union.

Read the bill:
S. 3622 - Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

THE COUNCIL TAKES NO INSTITUTIONAL POSITION ON POLICY ISSUES
AND HAS NO AFFILIATION WITH THE U.S.GOVERNMENT. ALL STATEMENTS
OF FACT AND EXPRESSIONS OF OPINION CONTAINED IN ALL ITS
PUBLICATIONS ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR OR
AUTHORS.
source


I wonder why they forward a bill to the council on foreign relations for approval if they have no position on policy issues and have no affiliation with the U.S. Government. Congress is asking the CFR to ok the American people to pay for the N.A.U.?


Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Alaska: Samantha Koenig Kidnapped last week.
  Posted 2 days ago with 111 member flags
Blue Spheres Fall from the Sky in the UK
  Posted 15 days ago with 81 member flags
The Chinese have seen the dragon in the sky !!
  Posted 2 days ago with 68 member flags
Strange Sounds in Sky Explained by Scientists
  Posted 11 days ago with 59 member flags
She Dialed 911. The Cop Who Came to Help Raped Her.
  Posted 4 days ago with 49 member flags
Anonymous: Revealing The Arcane Legal Trick Behind ACTA
  Posted 11 days ago with 42 member flags
Anonymous reveals Haditha massacre emails | RT
  Posted 7 days ago with 33 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 15 hours ago, 112 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 11 hours ago, 96 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 9 hours ago, 62 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 6 hours ago, 58 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 13 hours ago, 50 replies