It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
So after firing off missiles, you'd rather run back to base - just in time to be clobbered by the follow up A2G raid... each to their own I suppose.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
There is also the fact Japan is an island nation, and its more than likely any intercepts would take place over the sea. Would you rather be over the sea with two engines or one?
Originally posted by kilcoo316
An EF with 12 AAMs probably stands a better chance of returning from an oversea intercept than a 12 AAM loaded JSF.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
If the JSF ain't loaded with alot of missiles, it simply may not be able to kill all the bandits (unless you go toe to toe in WVR).
Originally posted by WestPoint23
That's too simplistic, any vast (paper) armada would be picked up as soon as it gets airborne, if not beforehand. Careful timing as well as SAM systems would negate any hypothetical "wave attack" even though I don't think China can/will try such a foolish thing. In a real world/combat situation (for Japan) you're looking at a two maybe three to one advantage in terms of numbers, anything more is nothing but a theoretical dream. In any case Japan will certainly not run out of missiles before China runs out of planes.
I don't get it? I'm having trouble conceptualizing a scenario in which China and Japan would simultaneously launch every single fighter they have in inventory (all loaded with max amount of missiles). And they all go at each other in one huge air battle. That's not how a real world event would play out, as I said before the F-35 carries enough missiles.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Japan uses the F-2. Also, can you give me the number of F-16's that have crashed due to an engine malfunction over it entire 35+ year history?
Originally posted by WestPoint23
How do you figure? Anyway, like I said a non stealthy EF Typhoon will not be as capable as an F-35 with six internal missiles. Carrying twelve missiles is pointless, no Typhoon is going to have a 12:1 kill ratio (lets not be ridicules here). As such I'm afraid you're going to loose a significant portion of your strike force every time you launch a mission that way.
Chinese Airforce (current, projected *)
76 - Su-27SK
76 - Su-30MK
100 - J-11 (to be upgraded to J-11B standard with PL-12 missiles)
100 - Su-27SKM*
50-100 J-10 (more to be produced later at a rate of 50 planes a year)
Originally posted by kilcoo316
The Chinese have numbers in their favour, so its pretty damn obvious they'd look to swarm the defence and overload it.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Nope, but it will be alot more than any 2 engined fighter.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
No typhoon is going to have a 12:1 kill ratio...
Originally posted by kilcoo316
But if 4 JSFs are facing up to 20 attacking Flankers with 10 J-10s on A2G on the follow-up, what happens?
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Hmmm. Doesn't matter if the JSFs do achieve a 6/0 kill ratio, they've no airbase to go back to and are operationally dead.
Originally posted by Darkpr0
Japan is a rich, populous country and is fully capable of producing its own aircraft.
Originally posted by Darkpr0
The pictures I see before me depict an aircraft that the Japanese are fully capable of producing. They produce cars in huge amounts, an aircraft wouldn't be the most monstrous leap ever.
Originally posted by Darkpr0
This means it will likely be far less expensive than the $200,000,000 US price tag of a Raptor, possibly deviating around 80-100 million.
Invest in a 'converted space launcher' and counter hostage the Chinese AND Korean capitals. Shut that 'yapper' Lil' Kim right the hell up.