 |
reply posted on 8-5-2007 @ 01:33 AM by damajikninja
|
Whew, good to see you Masqua!! We could certainly use some mod supervision here. The stories are getting thick, and the claims are stacking up
pretty high. So far, no proof of anything.
Rik, I highly suggest that you start posting real, plausible evidence from credible sources. Surely you realize the wild nature of your
claims, and surely you can understand the frustration and disbelief of those of us that are reading. Regardless of what you may personally believe
about your own statements, the rest of us will remain highly skeptical until we see some solid facts.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Here at ATS, we have front row seats to literally thousands of confirmed hoaxes and frauds every year. Please take this into consideration while
posting, and spend more time backing up your claims before moving on to the next one. We are much more likely to debate your opinions with you if you
can provide some clear data.
While I do not wish to insult you or deny your intelligence, you should be aware that your credibility here at ATS will do nothing but diminish
rapidly if you continue to make claims without producing quality evidence.
Thank you for taking this into consideration. 
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2007 @ 07:25 AM by rikriley
|
Spiders
damajikninja, thanks for your response. You probably have not read all of the input I have put on other threads on ATS. This one for starters go to
this website and discover how water has helped shape the surface on Mars www.martianspiders.com... this will keep you busy. Go to the bottom of
the page where it says Arthur C. Clarke on Martian Spiders scroll to the bottom where it says see my companion site of other interesting Martian
Photos click on go to the bottom of page where it says link to fluid. Rik Riley
[edit on 8-5-2007 by rikriley]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2007 @ 08:45 AM by rikriley
|
Originally posted by orthisguyoverhere
I'm sorry Rik but the link you provided does not use any scientific method at all and is I think designed to misinform. I did not mean to insult you
but after months and months of reading your posts you still haven't posted your information/evidence. I really think you may have been led down the
garden path by some of those websites. I did not mean that you needed a psychiatrist but the people spouting bollocks that you are linking to may.

I believe Sir Charles Shults the III is the best in the business when it comes to showing visual comparisons of fossils on Earth to fossils on Mars.
The raw photos I have are copywrited that have been taken on Mars and I have not gotten permission to release them as of yet. These photos I am
referring to have not been posted on the net as far as I know. Rik Riley
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2007 @ 10:23 AM by damajikninja
|
Originally posted by rikriley
damajikninja, thanks for your response. You probably have not read all of the input I have put on other threads on ATS. This one for starters go to
this website and discover how water has helped shape the surface on Mars www.martianspiders.com... this will keep you busy. Go to the bottom of
the page where it says Arthur C. Clarke on Martian Spiders scroll to the bottom where it says see my companion site of other interesting Martian
Photos click on go to the bottom of page where it says link to fluid. Rik Riley
[edit on 8-5-2007 by rikriley] 
Hey buddy, you went off on another tangent!  Stay focused here. Regardless of your other threads, we need to discuss the evidence that you have
for this topic.
Streamline your thoughts - sequentialy, one topic at a time.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2007 @ 11:03 AM by rikriley
|
Water
This is as stream line as it is going to get and Mars is a big place with lots to see and discover. Stay focused? Who put you in charge of my life?
It is my time table not yours what I release on this thread. I do not know you and you do not know me and you can agree to disagree on what I say or
what I see on Mars.
I am sorry you have not taken the time to review Spiders and you will gather a world of information about water on Mars, that is if of course you are
a disinformer. Lets start with water on Mars that is one of my first claims. It takes time to compile information on Mars and when you release it you
want it to be right. Are you saying Sir Charles Schults III is not a plausable source? I do not know about you but I consider most of his findings
clear data. Rik Riley
[edit on 8-5-2007 by rikriley]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2007 @ 05:09 PM by rikriley
|
Duncan this is not a game this is serious business to me and I am sorry you feel that way. Rik Riley
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2007 @ 09:20 PM by williamjklopp
|
Please everyone, let's not guve this fool anymore attention than IT is trying to get. I'm ignoring as well.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2007 @ 09:35 PM by rikriley
|
Thankyou Williamjklapp, for guving me your last bit of IT attention. One less believer off the list. Rik Riley
[edit on 8-5-2007 by rikriley]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-3-2008 @ 11:50 AM by vze2xjjk
|
reply to post by rikriley
Hi Rik,this is so good to read from over a year ago that you were plugging away and spreading the word.Thanks for being there ahead of me and helping
out all the time,even when just nodding,yes,instead of no. Jerry in Delaware.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-3-2008 @ 01:13 PM by rikriley
|
reply to post by vze2xjjk
Hi Jerry, individuals will continually take pop shots at us but that is O.K. that is the nature of the beast. Keep up the great work on exposing the
truth about life on Mars. Your sticking your neck out but many awards await you down the road from your exploration of Mars. Rik Riley
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-3-2008 @ 09:58 AM by vze2xjjk
|
One from Op panorama recent.The masking is heavy,like clay over the
face.
The reason for posting this is not just going over old
ground,but finding what's behind the mysterious lower 2nd figure which eluded me before.So it's a minor victory,just as nice as finding a double
overlap.Before I thought it was a MALE figure sandmarie,but now I see the masking shut me out of seeing it as a snake head.The dragon head is possibly
just a fat body portion of a snake,so I'm not confident in that. What I also discovered is that at least 4 -6 configurations appear around the
arms/shoulder of the "statue" sandmarie. One becomes a head from a snake whose body is "disappeared" in most images.Then what looks like eyebrow
bones in an x-ray appear like HANDLEBARS curved in front of her. There's a seeming bird beak in front and under her forming her bent legs(overlap).
Tons of variation.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-4-2008 @ 02:15 PM by rikriley
|
Again the realization that life exists on Mars will be further exposed when the Phoenix mission arrives on Mars. NASA needs a home run and funding to
continue it's space, moons and planet explorations. Phoenix will renew interest and release more funding for further exploration on Mars when
verification of life on Mars takes place. Rik Riley
[edit on 5-4-2008 by rikriley]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2008 @ 07:22 AM by fatdad
|
it dos not matter how basic life is on mars ..if its life -its life and i don't think the organized religion leaders will allow anyone to loosen
there strangle hold on the people of earth..theres to much money and power to be made by feeding the gullible tales of heaven and hell.....
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2008 @ 10:53 AM by rikriley
|
reply to post by fatdad
The life issue on Mars would have religious condemnations but not as drastic as you think. I believe many religions would accept life else where
since God is a creator. Rik Riley
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2008 @ 02:29 PM by Zelong
|
I see a BIRD what do you think?
image source: http://i26.tinypic.com/15ot9jl.jpg
external image
I also see a mound of dirt that has been chipped down with what looks like movement makings in the area,could be from the BIRD?I'm thinking the arm
has taken samples(if it can reach that far) opened up the dirt and the BIRD showed up?
image source: http://i28.tinypic.com/55jk9z.jpg
external image
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2008 @ 09:43 PM by rikriley
|
reply to post by Zelong
Hi Zelong good find, it looks like a bird alright others will say it is a shadow from the rock. If you will look to the left of the black bird you
will notice a narrow shadow where the bird is positioned and standing. The shinny left eye of the bird is positioned correctly for the shape of the
head. You hit it on the head when Viking 2 used the arm and scoop to scoop out a small trench of the surface and if any small lifeforms were unearthed
sorry unmarsed LOL, birds would be hanging around for a late lunch.
I have a raw loose photo of Viking 2 and in the background near the horizon it looks as though a flock of birds are scattering as they are taking off
in the air. I need a good scanner to show detail of the colored photo. Rik Riley
[edit on 6-4-2008 by rikriley]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-4-2008 @ 01:32 AM by Zelong
|
reply to
pos
t by rikriley
Yes my thoughts as well,the object in question is different in shape to
all other object/rocks around this picture, as you mentioned by looking
at the shadow it confirms the width and height by using the rock to the
left as a reference for the shadow  .
I will compare the BIRD like object to that of a Myna Bird from India
that is dark brown,strong yellow beck and eyes.
external image
image source: http://i28.tinypic.com/24wwow2.jpg
Australia has a cousin we call it the Miner Bird.
external image
When these birds are in the shade their Becks and Eyes do stand out
image source: http://i30.tinypic.com/2ytof0n.jpg
I see another object that looks made tubes brasst with plates between
two rocks.
image source: http://i32.tinypic.com/2llzgvr.jpg
external image
[edit on 7/4/08 by Zelong]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-4-2008 @ 05:27 AM by Zelong
|
Just reading this about a bloke called Dr. Edgar Turner (ret.),a key senior assistant supervisor of N.A.S.A. who states this picture was taken by
N.A.S.A'S Rover VII.
image source: http://au.geocities.com/splatflys/mars2.jpg
This picture was taken from Rover VII.
external image
What the Rover VII probe found on that first day on the Red Planet is nothing short of astonishing.
“We had just one shot left on a 24-exposure roll of Kodak 200 print film,” says Turner, “so we had to make it count. Whatever it was that was
moving might spook and split while we changed rolls of film via remote. That one shot was really our only chance.”
"Why are there no personnel records for Dr. Edgar Turner at N.A.S.A.; no college records for him at the Phoenix Institute of Technology, where he
earned his PhD in space science? (Have these records been destroyed?"

[edit on 7/4/08 by Zelong]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-4-2008 @ 06:33 AM by itisibrian
|
reply to post by Zelong
I think that is a joke
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |