It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shawnna
Frankly, I find all of the above disconcerting, to say the least.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Why are none of the "researchers" looking at this:
Originally posted by Duzey
Is the contention that ATS was put online as a site for Majestic at least a year before the game went into development? That Neil Young, creator of the game who didn't start working with EA until the end of 1996, asked Simon to set up a website two years later for his game while it was still an idea floating around in his head?
Originally posted by 11Bravo
Very Interesting, atleast to me.
Can anyone tell my why the EA game Majestic was controversial?
Originally posted by 11Bravo
So, do you own a copy of this game? You have played it?
I ask because I was wondering if events in the game were the controversy, or if the story line of a 'secret elite government entity' was the controversy.
Originally posted by 11Bravo
It wasn't a typical PC game, and it's no longer around. Unfortunately, the game was halted after 9/11 and the user base didn't reach the levels anticipated.
You say 'Unfortunately' here. Curious choice of words.
What is unfortunate about a video game going belly up? It happens all the time.
Why, in your best guess, was the game 'halted' after 911?
Originally posted by 11Bravo
Yes, how odd it is that the events of 911 appear to have effected the sales of one particlular video game and the growth one particular forum, and that these two seemingly unconnected things appear to have atleast a thread of commonality, and an inverse relationship to boot.
Originally posted by Shawnna
This is an interesting revelation - to say the least.
I am preserving this thread on my computer - just in case it disappears.
Originally posted by Jbird
What's even odder, to me , Shawna,
is the fact that tenured members such as yourself ,
are just discovering this.
I've listened to more than one Simon interview,
with the obligatory, 'History of ATS' question,
and don't recall any such game related background.
Seems like the kind of small talk that would,at least,
come up in RATS or an associated chat lounge,
doesn't it?
And SO has never heard of it?
Interesting synchronicity, even if innocent.
Originally posted by Shawnna
I've never had any reason to question the motives of any of the 3 Amigos - until recently.
Originally posted by Shawnna
If you read the information posted in the links provided by the OP - you'll quickly understand why this isn't something that is discussed openly - even in RATS.
Originally posted by Shawnna
You're right - it is being discussed now because an individual (the OP of this thread) posted his research.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Originally posted by Shawnna
Frankly, I find all of the above disconcerting, to say the least.
Why?
It's not on ATS.
It's on a fan site for a game about those subjects.
It's long before ATS evolved into what it is now, and looks to be Simon's first effort to give his site a traffic kick by providing a destination for fans of the game.
Originally posted by Duzey
That's OK though, I'm used to my genius being overlooked.
Originally posted by Shawnna
Why does that seem odd to you?
I've never had any reason to question the motives of any of the 3 Amigos - until recently.
Originally posted by Shawnna If you read the information posted in the links provided by the OP - you'll quickly understand why this isn't something that is discussed openly - even in RATS.
www.elfis.net...
Should a third party unknowingly intercept one of the game's death threats and turn it over to law enforcement, we imagine that there will be a whole lot of explaining to do."
Originally posted by Jbird
Wasn't there a movie with a similar theme, about 10 years or so ago, starring Michael Douglas?
Originally posted by SimonGray
Oh dear... I can't believe the paranoia which some people have...
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Originally posted by Shawnna
Frankly, I find all of the above disconcerting, to say the least.
Why?
It's not on ATS.
Originally posted by SimonGray
Why would this thread disappear?
Originally posted by SimonGray
Shawnna, you do realise this link you provided - www.virtuallystrange.net... - claims that three of the biggest and longest serving Alternative Discussion websites on the web, all around prior to EA's Majestic game, are hoax sites. Do you not see the complete stupidity in that statement?
Among the many ethical ambiguities implied by the very premise of the game is its use of real and fake web sites to promote real and hoax news stories. The game designers have gone so far as to create front companies for several of these web sites. They are actively urging fans of the game to create web sites to act as fronts for the game.
Originally posted by intrepid
I can see why that post was deleted. YOUR continued attempts at raising drama on the board, this post is just a continuation of this. If ATS just isn't swinging for you anymore, why don't you just leave as opposed to derailing threads and causing unwanted drama? Do YOU have an aganda here Shawnna?
Originally posted by Shawnna
Originally posted by intrepid
I can see why that post was deleted. YOUR continued attempts at raising drama on the board, this post is just a continuation of this. If ATS just isn't swinging for you anymore, why don't you just leave as opposed to derailing threads and causing unwanted drama? Do YOU have an aganda here Shawnna?
No, Intrepid, no agenda at all.
It appears to me that simply questioning anything related to ATS is equated to 'causing unwanted drama'. Why is that?
Originally posted by Shawnna
I find it disconcerting because it was created by one of the owners of ATS who appears to think it is "cool" to participate or promote activities that include making up news when the real news doesn't lend itself to an objective.
It appears to me that simply questioning anything related to ATS is equated to 'causing unwanted drama'. Why is that?
Originally posted by Shawnna
It appears to me that simply questioning anything related to ATS is equated to 'causing unwanted drama'. Why is that?
[edit on 7-1-2007 by Shawnna]