No use telling Marduk to behave himself and be more objective in his presentation of his 'facts'. Ridicule is his way to kill a topic, he has all
the time in the world to do it here while the rest of us have a life and other work to perform. Just ignore him, cos no matter what he presents, his
only interest is in killing a thread, having the last word, show his deluded sense of 'intellect', nothing to do with the truth.
IF only he had been more objective, he would have research both views on a topic and do a proper presentation, but unfortunately no, he prefers to
stick to old school of thoughts, not question old knowledge for the betterment of science and be comfortable there in that zone.
I can understand that emotion, because he probably studied hard to be where he is and others MUST respect his 'knowledge'. Unfortunately, knowledge
is not a lake but a running stream. What we know today will be obsolete with new understanding tomorrow. This is a fact. Please prove me wrong.
Take the example of LDG - libyan desert glass. His claim that ALL geologists agree to it is due to metorite origin in another thread is erraneous.
Many are comfortable with that explanation, but unfortunately, many others are not due to several factors. Unless we have all the facts, to allude LDG
to metorites is only lying to ourselves and that's NOT the way of science or knowledge
A) If any is from Washington University in St. Louis, go check "The Enigma of Libyan Desert Glass." a presentation by Robert A. Weeks, prof.
emeritus, Vanderbilt U in Oct 2000.
Briefly:-The enigma of this glass is:
1. The amount. It is the largest known deposit of a natural silica glass, ~98% SiO2 , on Earth.
2. It's distribution. The distribution is approximately elliptical, ~130 km by ~50 km with the major axis ~NNW by SSE.
3. Physical properties. The composition and structure of the glass are consistent with a hypothesis that the glass was formed from melted desert dune
sand and subsequently cooled over a period greater than 24 hours in an Earth atmosphere.
4. Fusion energy. Possibly a meteorite or comet impact, but there are no meteor craters detectable from satellite photos with a resolution of ~5m
within 150 km. No Libyan Desert Glass has been found at the nearest meteorite crater, located in Libya, ~150km to the west.
5. Chemistry. The glass cannot have been fused from the local exposed sandstone.
6. Age of glass and dunes. The dune sand and dunes have been formed in a time estimated to be less than 1,000,000 years, yet the fission track dates
of the glass have a mean of ~28,000,000 years.
7. Surface geology. 28,000,000 years ago some geologists estimate that the sandstone was beneath ~300m of limestone and covered with vegetation.
B) Another school of thought, hydrothermal hypothesis
hometown.aol.de...
C.)New Mexico atomic blast test turns desert sands into fused green glass:- New York Herald Tribune on February 16, 1947
D.) Radioactive melting. A primer for Thermal radiation:-
en.wikipedia.org...
As much as i hate to link to websites for research, i would recommend those who are serious to go to your local libraries for information. It is more
detailed. google fu are only summarised or limited versions.
Edit:- Allow me to spare you using the dispute of trinitite/atomite glass from atomic test explosions in comparisons to LDG. The type of glass is
fully dependent on the type of geological ground the impact occurs, as well as as the power magnitude of the explosion/blast.
[edit on 21-12-2006 by SeekerofTruth102]