says who? you might believe that evolution is just a matter of trial and error, but if less complex systems tend to favor certain configurations
(think crystals, think alloys, graphite and diamond) why categorically exlude the possibility that life has its favorites, too?
civilisation is not a crystal or an alloy
you're making a straw man argument so that you can demolish it
history is riddled with people who believed they knew it all, only to be invalidated once they died and were therefore no longer able to control
research.
that may have been true in the past but its an outdated concept thesedays
new research is now built on old research that is arrived at with facts made from empricial data
Max Planck died 60 years ago and things have since moved on
did you know that biology textbooks once contained beautiful illustrations of little men sitting in the heads of sperm cells
yes at the start of the 18th century
is all your information this up to date ?
if green, fused glass is produced by natural processes how come we don't see them in action? meteor impacts tend to eject matter, so they really
cannot cover large areas with pure (95+%Sio2) glass, can they? saying it was a tunguska type event is fallacious, because tunguska itself is disputed,
for the simple reason that it's a post-hoc explanation, without known precedent and without confirmation.
Meteor impacts produced the green desert glass
that has been proven several times over in this thread already
i suggest you go back and read the scientific analysis of the glass that was posted earlier in this thread along with the impact site of the meteorite
that caused it
the glass was not pure
Libyan Desert Glass is a natural glass composed of nearly pure silica (98 wt %). The formation of this glass, because of its unusual composition has
for long been considered as mysterious. Chemical analyses show that the glass is locally enriched in meteoritic elements, with typical chondritic
proportions. The only explanation for these observations is that Libyan Desert Glass results from a meteorite impact on a silica-rich target.
(Abstract, "Silica 96", Robert Rocchia, CEA-CNRS, Fr.)
www.saharamet.com...
Provide one of your links and make it something from outside the ice age.
www.nau.edu...
www.taipeitimes.com...
www.sciencedaily.com...
www.smh.com.au...
Why would we if it vanishes in 200,000 years?
so once again you are claiming that the fact that there is no evidence somehow makes your claim stronger
heads up buddy it doesnt
it just makes your claim more desperate
Civilizations of the past did not have to rival ours in size and scope... also plate tectonics and other natural disasters have completely changed
the topography of the planet and in the process moved resources around.
And what resources are you saying are limited and not capable of regenerating? Oil? ...Iron ore? gold? silver?
Everything except for oil would still be here to be reused again and it is even debatable if oil does not replenish itself....but for the sake of
argument I will say it does not....that does not mean they could not have used some other renewable resource as energy.
there is no evidence of any civilisation in the past on this planet
plate tectonics have not renewed the surface world
do you understand what plate tectonics actually is ?
it certainly doesnt sound like it
Iron ore and gold are not renewable resources as once they have been mined from the ground they are gone forever
are you suggesting that your imaginery lost civilisation mined metals and then when it had finished changed them back into ore again and replanted
them in the ground so that nobody would noitice
laughable
your claim that they used some other renewable source of energy is interesting
what source are you saying that they utilised ?
oh and provide a link for that please
Exactly how old is the fossil record? Does it go back billions of years
www.ucmp.berkeley.edu...
The oldest known fossils, in fact, are cyanobacteria from Archaean rocks of western Australia, dated 3.5 billion years old.
And again with plate tectonics, earthquakes and other natural disasters do we really know what happened on this planet a billion or so years ago?
www.scotese.com...
Or are you claiming its all been figured out and there is nothing left to learn or be discovered?
It is well known that the odds of any civilisation of a different species having existed on this planet before us are virtually impossible to
counter
www.jb.man.ac.uk...
the drake equation works out the probability of life comparable to ours existing in the entire galaxy
currently its estimated that there are ten other civilisations out there
and that is in the entire galaxy
learn to walk before you can run
you're overstretching your imagination
if you don't start with the facts and work a theory out from there then you don't have a theory
you just have your imagination
