Let's End The Controlled Demolition Theory!, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 24-11-2006 @ 08:03 PM by CameronFox
On September 9, 2005, Mr. Dara McQuillan, a spokesman for Silverstein Properties, issued the following statement on this issue:

Seven World Trade Center collapsed at 5:20 p.m. on September 11, 2001, after burning for seven hours. There were no casualties, thanks to the heroism of the Fire Department and the work of Silverstein Properties employees who evacuated tenants from the building.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) conducted a thorough investigation of the collapse of all the World Trade Center buildings. The FEMA report concluded that the collapse of Seven World Trade Center was a direct result of fires triggered by debris from the collapse of WTC Tower 1.

In the afternoon of September 11, Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Department Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires. Mr. Silverstein expressed his view that the most important thing was to protect the safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have them withdraw from the building.

Later in the day, the Fire Commander ordered his firefighters out of the building and at 5:20 p.m. the building collapsed. No lives were lost at Seven World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.

As noted above, when Mr. Silverstein was recounting these events for a television documentary he stated, “I said, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is to pull it.” Mr. McQuillan has stated that by “it,” Mr. Silverstein meant the contingent of firefighters remaining in the building.

ok..that explains Silversteins quote. (if he did have it blown up...why would he admit it on TV? ) Why if it was SO obvious...wouldn't the insurance companies not investigate before giving this guy MILLIONS !


PULL does not mean to use explosives. WHY OH WHY do people still think that....

This is taken from the SAME documentary on PBS: America Rebuilds

www.911myths.com...

Worker #1: Oh, we’re getting ready to pull building six.

Luis Mendes: We have to be very careful how we demolish building six. We were worried about the building six coming down and demolishing the slurry wall, so we wanted that particular building to fall within a certain area.

Worker #1: We’ve got the cables attached in four different locations... <”going up”? hard to hear>... Now they’re pulling [gestures to vehicles] pulling the building to the north. It’s not every day you try to pull down a eight storey building with cables”

GEESH


files.abovetopsecret.com...

This is from building 6 ...notice the cables.

[edit on 24-11-2006 by CameronFox]


reply posted on 24-11-2006 @ 09:47 PM by PisTonZOR
So tell me, when was the last time ever in human history has a HIGHRISE ever fell due to some fire..

So tell me, when was the last time a Boeing 767 hit a building at, what? 425knots?

When was the last time that a weakened structure without fire protection, had 90,850 litres of jet fuel burn in it?


Remember boys and girls, steel weakens at 2500+f not 500F or as jet fuels are concerned 600+

FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800º to 1500ºF EASILY close enough to significantly weaken the already smashed structure.

Steel weakens to 50% at 1200°F

2500+ is close to the actual melting point of steel. You don't need to melt steel to weaken it.

Ever see how fast Steel melts with thermite?

Yep. But two questions:

1: Why is there only something that looks like thermite in like 2 places on the towers?

2: Why would thermite be on the outside of the building?



Also when anyone states that the fires were at 1200 F ... you must consider that does NOT indicate the steel was at that temp since the steel conducts the heat and the structure acts as a heat sink and disipates the heat and spreads it out through its' beams and members. So to claim the buildings steel lost 50% of its' strength is agin false and misleading.

True. However even if it was at a lower temperature and lost say, 25% of its strength, I'd say that's already enouph to make a already weakened structure colapse.

How about explaining this to me...

external image

That's the South Tower. How did the top loose it's momentum and suddenly cause the lower undamaged structure to fall vertically onto itself ejecting outer core columns 600 ft while turning concrete, office furniture, people etc... into a fine dust that covered lower Manhattan?

I've asked you all this question many times. None of you have even tried to answer it.

Easy. A support beam on the left of that picture broke, tipping the tower to the left. The huge increase in load on the rest of the structure was enourmous causing the top floor to collapse. The collapsed top floor would create a domino effect.

Yeah yeah yeah, my theory is pretty cruddy

^ BS. 'pull it' is a knowN demolition term.

No it isn't, ask any demolition firm that and they'll say it isn't used.

Also, even if that was true, why would he say it? It makes no sence.


reply posted on 24-11-2006 @ 10:50 PM by quicknthedead
Originally posted by Valhall
Well, first of all, I don't see where I admitted anything happened before the planes hit. I also don't see where I denied same. So see how you jumped to conclusions? That's not a safe (nor is it an intelligent) thing to do.

Second, let's pretend I DID say explosions happened before the planes hit - or even after the planes hit - THAT DOES NOT EQUATE TO A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

Open your mind - there's more than what you're obsessing on.


My mind is wide open. I thought you had said explosions happened before.
I know you said explosions happened.

I thought you had read this that I have posted numerous times at this forum and in this thread.

Please read it now and then we can continue. Thanks.
(And yes, there were explosions before the plane hit.)
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------

“Seismic Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Version II)”
Link:
www.scholarsfor911truth.org...
By Craig T. Furlong & Gordon Ross, Scholars for 9/11 Truth: www.st911.org...

The US Government, incriminated by its own facts, the perfect evidence—how ironic.
Summary:
News Tip: A real 9/11 smoking gun…that no one can debunk (these are facts, not theory).
Airplane “Impact” Times: Incriminating Evidence of 9/11 Coverup & Complicity

The official times for plane "impact" [precise to the second] as declared by the US Government, from both the 9/11 Commission and from NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), are different and yet both are true and accurate times. What can this factual contradiction mean? Looking exclusively at WTC1, there is found an indisputable causal link:

One World Trade, September 11, 2001
American Airlines Flight 11 “impact” time:
8:46:30 UTC, per LDEO seismic data (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2005)
8:46:40 UTC, per FAA last primary radar contact (9/11 Commission Final Report, 2004)

Q- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event that occurred 10 seconds before the actual air crash at 8:46:40?
A- The only possibility is huge explosions, as corroborated by many eyewitnesses at the time.
Q- Who caused these explosions before the plane hit?

Notes:
In 2004, the 9/11 Commission avoided addressing the earlier seismic time (which had been attributed in error by Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, originally in 2001 as plane “impact”).
In 2005, NIST avoided addressing the 9/11 Commission’s later time for the aircraft’s actual impact.
Both the 9/11 Commission and NIST avoided addressing the many witnesses who testified of explosions in the sub-basements before the plane crashed.

Summary:
This precision data has yet to be refuted. It is from the two highest governmental entities charged with looking into what happened on 9/11. Both declared these times as accurate, and in doing so corroborate William Rodriguez and the many eyewitnesses the morning of 9/11 who testified of explosions in the sub-basements of WTC1 before American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building. This is indicting evidence of governmental coverup, and thus implication of complicity.

Before it is too late, demand a new, truly independent, criminal investigation of 9/11, this time a real one.
Justice waits...{and there is no statute of time limitation on murder}
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 10 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 2 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 12 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 6 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 16 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 6 days ago with 8 member flags