Explosives and CD are a hot issue and I suspect will always be with no resolution of the argument within this century.
Personally I saw no evidence of explosives exploding but I wasn't there in person and the first reports of the basement explosion are compelling but;
no explosions of a scale capable of destroying the major supporting parts of the overall structure sufficiently to bring about collapse were evident.
Also, as mentioned earlier, evidence of columns cut by explosions is lacking and thermite being very messy stuff would leave mountains of evidence.
All the rubble including the steel was taken to places like Staten Island and picked through carefully for remains of victims, personal effects, items
of value by an army of workers yet no reports of 'unusual' effects on the steel came from there but they did find enough to identify the remains of
over 300 of the victims. What I found remarkable is that the bulk of the core column sections appear to have snapped cleanly at the welds and were
virtually undamaged otherwise.
I'm still open to solid evidence of something exotic and invisible that leaves no trace and functions without blasts but so far it appears to me that
the buildings suffered terminal damage from the planes striking them and they simply fell down. The collapses weren't necessary from a terror point
of view, maybe desirable but not essential.
Let's End The Controlled Demolition Theory!, page 24
privacy
reply posted on 7-4-2008 @ 12:29 PM by snoopy
Originally posted by bsbray11
Snoopy I really want you to look at this link carefully before I respond to you anymore:
42 informal logical fallacies
We'll be talking about one thing, and I'll respond, and you'll respond again with something that completely contradicts what your originally said, or abandons your original point.
Here's an example:
Originally posted by snoopy
NIST didn't test for residue because it would not be possible.
You were just asking me where the evidence of explosives was, and now you say that it wouldn't really even be possible to test for them.
It's hard to really discuss anything intelligently with someone who can't remember what they just said in their last post.
Once again, the problem is that you simply don't understand how this works. I did NOT EVER EVER EVER EVER ****EVER**** say it's impossible to test for explosives. You simply did NOT read what I wrote.
The way it works is you don't go testing for chemical residue unless there is evidence of explosives. You seem to think that the only way to determine if there are explosives is by testing for chemical residue. THIS IS 100% FALSE!!!! Do you understand? It's very simple.
The reason for this is because there are so many materials in such an event that it's near impossible to determine simply from chemical residue that they were put their by explosives since most of them exist there naturally. So the way to determine explosives is by looking at the tell tale signatures they leave behind. if you actual find those signatures, then you might do some chemical testing to see if it further backs the REAL evidence of explosives. C4, Thermite, etc. They all leave clues by the marks they leave behind. Anyone searching through the debris pile would instantly be able to recognize the damage left by explosives. NIST has stated that they found no such evidence what so ever. So of course they aren't going to test for residue because it would be completely and utterly pointless.
DO YOU UNDERSTAND??? I am not typing in bold as yelling, but to highlight the importance of such words. Do you understand now? Or are you going to pretend that I am changing the subject which is a complete lie?
reply posted on 8-4-2008 @ 12:14 AM by Markshark4
It's not just that the towers collapsed, which is odd, it's HOW they collapsed which is really troubling.
To have it happen 3 times in the same day in the exact same manner is an obvious inside job.
To take down 200,000 tons of steel you need to get at the under infra-structure of a building.
90% of the North Tower was holding up the other 10% ... yet it still collapsed exactly like the South Tower!
lol
William Rodriguez isn't the only one to hear a HUGE explosion in the sub-level before the 1st plane hit either.
The government's story, Pancake theory, while possible, is not very probable.
The floors would've taken at least 30-45 seconds to pancake all the way down.
The floors would've been stacked on top of each other at the bottom too, not pulverized into fine dust.
And most importantly, a concept debunkers are too stupid to grasp, the massive 47 steel core columns would've still been sticking straight up into the air AT LEAST a couple hundred feet after the floors pancaked all the way down. The 47 steel core columns would NOT have been little stubs.
The planes did not cut all of those columns at the BOTTOM of the towers, and obviously fire & jetfuel didn't either.
WTC 5 & WTC 6 were PULLED months after 9/11, but the damage those two buildings took on 9/11 made the twin towers & WTC 7 look like NOTHING!
WTC 5 was literally cut in half and it still didn't collapse!
I think 1/2 the country knows what's up, the other 1/2 is brainwashed by the mainstream media, and the power of denial allows them to believe whatever they want to believe.
But I guarantee there WILL be another 9/11, much bigger, and we will go to war with Iran.
Just like Paul Craig Roberts said.
en.rian.ru...
370+ Engineers & Architects question 9/11:
www.patriotsquestion911.com...
Military, CIA, Structural Engineers, Pilots, Physicists all question 9/11:
georgewashington.blogspot.com...
.
To have it happen 3 times in the same day in the exact same manner is an obvious inside job.
To take down 200,000 tons of steel you need to get at the under infra-structure of a building.
90% of the North Tower was holding up the other 10% ... yet it still collapsed exactly like the South Tower!
lol William Rodriguez isn't the only one to hear a HUGE explosion in the sub-level before the 1st plane hit either.
The government's story, Pancake theory, while possible, is not very probable.
The floors would've taken at least 30-45 seconds to pancake all the way down.
The floors would've been stacked on top of each other at the bottom too, not pulverized into fine dust.
And most importantly, a concept debunkers are too stupid to grasp, the massive 47 steel core columns would've still been sticking straight up into the air AT LEAST a couple hundred feet after the floors pancaked all the way down. The 47 steel core columns would NOT have been little stubs.
The planes did not cut all of those columns at the BOTTOM of the towers, and obviously fire & jetfuel didn't either.
WTC 5 & WTC 6 were PULLED months after 9/11, but the damage those two buildings took on 9/11 made the twin towers & WTC 7 look like NOTHING!
WTC 5 was literally cut in half and it still didn't collapse!
I think 1/2 the country knows what's up, the other 1/2 is brainwashed by the mainstream media, and the power of denial allows them to believe whatever they want to believe.
But I guarantee there WILL be another 9/11, much bigger, and we will go to war with Iran.
Just like Paul Craig Roberts said.
en.rian.ru...
370+ Engineers & Architects question 9/11:
www.patriotsquestion911.com...
Military, CIA, Structural Engineers, Pilots, Physicists all question 9/11:
georgewashington.blogspot.com...
.
reply posted on 29-6-2008 @ 11:07 AM by jprophet420
I don't have time to refute your whole post but just this statement will do for now...
NIST admits both that flames were ejected and that the source of the flames are unknown. There is a thread about it Here.
So there is proof that not every expert agrees on what you posted.
4- Squibs..EVERY expert has come out to agree these are not FLUMES or Squibs, but air, dust and debris.
NIST admits both that flames were ejected and that the source of the flames are unknown. There is a thread about it Here.
So there is proof that not every expert agrees on what you posted.
WTC7, the smoking gun that just will not go away until the traiters are rounded up
Posted 3 days ago with 35 member flags
Posted 3 days ago with 35 member flags
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
Reddit Founder And Activists Aim To Build A 'Bat-Signal For The Internet'
Breaking Alternative News: 17 hours ago, 20 flags
Breaking Alternative News: 17 hours ago, 20 flags
Honors student arrested for truancy...it gets worse.
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 13 hours ago, 15 flags
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 13 hours ago, 15 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
Obama Twice Mistakenly Mentions ‘My Sons,' While Defending Contraception Mandate
US Political Madness: 11 hours ago, 90 replies
US Political Madness: 11 hours ago, 90 replies
Seized from smugglers, the leather-bound 'gospel' which Iran claims will bring down Christianity a
Breaking Alternative News: 13 hours ago, 62 replies
Breaking Alternative News: 13 hours ago, 62 replies
Honors student arrested for truancy...it gets worse.
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 13 hours ago, 56 replies
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 13 hours ago, 56 replies
Guards at most well known women's prison in Alabam regularly rape inmates
General Conspiracies: 7 hours ago, 47 replies
General Conspiracies: 7 hours ago, 47 replies
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.101 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.101 seconds
