It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New bizarre 9/11 conspiracy theory - You won't believe it

page: 7
0
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 13 2006 @ 03:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by In nothing we trust

Originally posted by chetinglendalevillage
www.breitbart.com...


Venezuelan socialist president Hugo Chavez supporter of freedom of speech in america.

Venezuelan Foreign Minister Nicolas Maduro "An independent international investigation must be carried out one day to discover the truth about the events of Sept. 11."

---

On the other hand were not so sure that president Bush is such a strong suporter of freedom of speech.

George W. Bush - "there ought to be limits to freedom" - News conference (May 21, 1999)


We've carried "freedom of speech" too far! Now anybody who raises a question deserves a special investigation? And now, you've got some idiot preparing to incite riots by making new images of the Prophet Mohammed and selling them to people. This will cause even more rioting, make more terrorists, and there will be even another 9/11.

www.dashboardmohammed.com...

We are fools if we continue to allow people to say anything. It wears down on our security, and we need security now!




posted on Sep, 13 2006 @ 04:17 AM
link   
For starters, isn't it strange that NOT ONE PICTURE ever showed any wreckage? Where are the PARTS OF THE PLANES? ANY parts???
Usually when planes crash, they take the pieces to a hangar and examine them to see what went wrong. WE KNOW there were highjackings, but there could have been also evidence on board the planes of bombs, etc.
From the lack of wreckage, I guess we must assume that all those "accidents" were CRASHES OF UFOs! After all....THEIR wreckage NEVER shows up!



posted on Sep, 13 2006 @ 09:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by Imzadi
From the lack of wreckage, I guess we must assume that all those "accidents" were CRASHES OF UFOs! After all....THEIR wreckage NEVER shows up!



Don't forget the passport of one of the hijackers that 'miraculously' survived the blazing fireball that was basically the plane as it tore through the building.



posted on Sep, 13 2006 @ 09:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by firebat
Don't forget the passport of one of the hijackers that 'miraculously' survived the blazing fireball that was basically the plane as it tore through the building.


In order that passport...

1. Flew out of his pocket.
2. Did not get bloody from the "box cutter" massacre that we are to belive happened in the cockpit.
3. Upon impact, exited the plane.
4. Survice the fireball, without a mark.
5. Flew OUT of the building.
6. Floated to the side walk amongst hundreds of thousands of pages of documents and debris spread over tens of square blocks.
6. Was immediately found amongst TONS and TONS of dust and papers.

Yeah... make sperfect sense.



posted on Sep, 13 2006 @ 11:44 AM
link   
Also, the mysterious "man in black" as I call him who gave it to a police officer. I would think if I was a civilian at ground zero when it is happenening, I wouldn't be going through tons of debris looking for anything....let alone to find Atta's passport. Can we say, government agent planting evidence? I think we can in this situation.

Edit to add:

I'm surprised it didn't have written on the back "Death to Americans", "Praise Allah" just to get the point accross.

[edit on 9/13/2006 by Griff]



posted on Sep, 13 2006 @ 11:49 AM
link   
I just thought of something.

Let's say for a minute that it actually was Atta's passport and it did indead do all the magic bullet stuff Slap Nuts said.

This in my mind makes it look like Atta wasn't planning on being a suicide martyr. Why would he have a passport on a domestic flight? I think he was thinking to highjack the plane and fly it somewhere oversees. He would need his passport to get through customs at the other end wouldn't he?


Nah, I'm going with government agent plant.



posted on Sep, 13 2006 @ 02:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by Imzadi
For starters, isn't it strange that NOT ONE PICTURE ever showed any wreckage? Where are the PARTS OF THE PLANES? ANY parts???


There are pictures of flight 77 wreckage, but I believe that they were supplied by the government.

And I think there are some pictures of an engine which ended up in the street from one of the twin towers planes. What ever happended to that engine?

And then there is the piece of airplane skin from flight 77, which just happens to show a part of the word 'american'. The rest of the plane seems to have disintigrated, except for the ever controversial engine piece and landing gear photos. Good thing it wasn't any other unpainted piece of the aircraft, which was found on the pentagons lawn, other wise we might have some doubt that it was 'AN AMERICAN' plane that hit the pentagon.



Which is just about as bizarre as our friend lloyd the taxi driver holding up his 1/2 of a one dollar bill. The other 1/2 is supposably in the hands of a mysterious stranger, who worked at the pentagon. lloyds taxi was hit by a light pole from flight 77.

So what do you do after you are involved in a bad car wreck and witness a terriable plane crash? Well you find a dollar bill floating in the wind, of course. Then you tear it in half and give the other 1/2 to a guy who works at the pentagon.


Perhaps the pentagon needed half a dollar to pay back the 2.3 trillion dollars that they reported as missing on 9/10/2001.


www.abovetopsecret.com...



But no more bizarre than the airlines which were chosen for the attack.

United and American.

Or a United America.




[edit on 13-9-2006 by In nothing we trust]



posted on Sep, 13 2006 @ 05:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by dipsothedrunk

Given the vast amounts of money involved here -and please no one take this the wrong way- has some one taken a very very sick business decission?


Has anyone ever found out how much was collected on the insurance on those buildings? I am quite sure they would have been insured... and after the 1993 "attempt" if I owned a building that might be a terrorist threat, I would be calling LLoyds of London to up my policy... just in case...

If you really wanted a building gone... and used demolition you would have to pay LOTS o BIG BUCKS to do that... this way you collect the insurance and the government pays for the cleanup...

Too crazy huh? No one would do such a thing....

But they did get that third building for free, the one that fell by itself...




posted on Sep, 13 2006 @ 06:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by dipsothedrunk

Given the vast amounts of money involved here -and please no one take this the wrong way- has some one taken a very very sick business decission?


Too crazy huh? No one would do such a thing....


I think that you are thinking too small. The world trade centers were the financial center of the world. Well except for the world bank in switzerland.

2001 marked the imminant financial collapse of America. Every major corporation has some kind of major accounting fraud, the fortune 500 has almost completed it's capital flight from the US to various 3rd world countries around the world. America's pension funds are all underfunded and health care insurance is a chaotic debacle.

Social security, the biggest ponzi scheme ever developed is on the verge of bankruptcy. And the federal government doesn't even attempt to balance the budget. They just keep printing more paper money with the hope that people will continue to believe that it has value.

In 1836 the second bank of the United States collapsed. It existed in another form for 5 more years before it disappeared entirely.


the bank needed to be abolished because:

- it was unconstitutional
- it concentrated an excessive amount of the nation's financial strength into a single institution
- it exposed the government to control by "foreign interests"
- it exercised too much control over members of the Congress

en.wikipedia.org...


In 2001 the 3rd bank (Federal Reserve System) of the United States began to collapse, pretty much for the same reasons that the second bank collapsed.

I believe that 9/11 was an organized business decision by the controlling interests.



[edit on 13-9-2006 by In nothing we trust]



posted on Sep, 13 2006 @ 10:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by make_it_work
We are fools if we continue to allow people to say anything.


Ummm OK.


President Bush - August 5, 2004

Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.

www.whitehouse.gov...


Here's the video sound bite.

video.google.com...



posted on Sep, 14 2006 @ 03:13 AM
link   
Damn he actually said that!

But see? We just keep on going, like the nice flock we are..

BBBAaahhhhhh



posted on Sep, 14 2006 @ 03:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon
Damn he actually said that!

But see? We just keep on going, like the nice flock we are..

BBBAaahhhhhh


You can have faith in your master


Or you can have faith in your master




[edit on 14-9-2006 by In nothing we trust]



posted on Sep, 16 2006 @ 08:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by In nothing we trust


You can have faith in your master







OH I LOVE THAT ONE!!!!



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join