It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dgtempe
Really?
My husband thinks he's pretty smart too. Too bad he cant cook a meal, he cant wash dishes, he cant take the garbage out, he doesnt know how to go food shopping, or how to wash and dry clothes either.
In other words, Mr Dgtempe is a nobody without me.
Originally posted by doggmann
i can complain that the fact women have entered the workforce has changed the tax system that forces most families to have two incomes to survive.that liberation has done nothing to help the familiy at home. all forms of government and the direction of societies starts at the home. the older generations enjoyed the benefits of beening raised by their own mothers, was is there so much juvie crime nowadays? maybe because kids are not being raised by their parents. explain to me how juggling work,kids,housework,supper,husband,maintaining one's feminitiy,and trying to be the same as men at the same time, liberating!?
Originally posted by PisTonZOR
Hey guys, first post here
First off, I havn't bothered to read the whole thread, the ones that I did read were sexist and immature.
Anyway, you people should know that there are 3 OTHER types of intelligence AFAIK, and just IQ DOSN'T make Males superior. I can think of dosens of things that men are generally better at, and things that women are generally better at.
The main factor is the person being tested, at my age (14) girls are smarter than boys, but I am in the top 12% of maths / science results as them
Originally posted by jlc163
Originally posted by mj13
(Sorry, I've waited for a long time to be able to say that to a group of guys.)
I have said that to a group of guys, too many times to count.
Oh, and something I keep forgetting to put in:
4.) It is a substantially larger number of women who know instinctively, during their first encounter with them, what people are psyco sexual predators, than other men do. It can be argued as a part of many things from a higher intelligence to being more in touch with their primitive side....but I vote for sheer experience.
Originally posted by pepsi78
I was talking about a totaly different thing, you're completly off the subject, it's caracteristics of the sex, it's not about who invented the first tool, if you look at a female hand you will see it's fingers are design different, like a lock picker's hand, fingers are also different, they are slimer , sharper, the sex it's self is a very differet not only the way it acts but also the way it influences things, biology proved that we are 2 different things, we are influenced by different things, we react different, man and woman are 2 different creatures and do have different special needs.
First of all the sexual instinct, and the way we mate and what we like is different, studies proved we react different do numeros things, every side is best at something, there is no equality.
This thing with we are the same is a fery tail provided by the feminist agenda.
[edit on 13-9-2006 by pepsi78]
Originally posted by doggmann
the thing is, that neither men nor women are equal. both have different qualities,strengths,and weaknessess. the fact tht men have a stronger aptitude towards certain academics does not make them superior just different. the sooner women stop trying to be mens equals and start embracing their own qualities the sooner our society can go back to the way it should be. we all have roles.
Pepsi, I may be a woman but at least I know how to spell and put together a paragraph that is grammatically correct.
uhm................................
Originally posted by dawnstar
2 different creatures?? a cat is still a cat, regardless of weather it's male or female, isn't it?? 2+2 still equals 3+1, right? a+b+c might equal man, and x+y+z might equal women but a+b+c=x+y+z= HUMAN!!!
and not every male is best at cars and football, and quite frankly their math might just stink!! and not every female is best at laundry, and mopping floors and picking up after your arse....and quite frankly, their parenting skills might just stink!! the a in the equation above is a variable, that just might mean anything from a to zzzz, and so is the b, the c, the x, the y and the z......a man and women can share the same variable equation...but regardless of whatever their equation is, it still equals the same thing....HUMAN. the fact that society tends to deem some equations as being more worthy as others is beside the point. the fact that it found those equations that tend to make little suzy homemaker and good mommy as less than equal was just sheer stupidity. the fact that they then proceeded to assume that equation based on sex, or race or other easily identifiable traits was just plain insane simply because it wasted human potential....and well....where could we be if all those people throughout the ages were allowed to be free to persue their interests, and develope their talents but instead were assigned their talents and abilities at birth by men based on their sex or race?
where you see the fact that their are very few women inventors in history as proof for their lack of ability, I see it as a proof of wasted potential. who knows, we could be living disease free, or flying to the stars, but the inventors were black and therefore forced to be farmers for thier masters on some southern plantation, or a women, too busy tending to her 10 kids to bring that idea to fullfillment.
by the way, greed has alot to do with why both mommy and daddy have to work their tails off to earn a living....as long as profits rule, employers will manage to find ways not to pay a living wage, and companies that deal with the basic necessities of life will find ways to increase the cost of those things....I mean it ain't like we can all boycott gas now is it?? and well, if they can't get their cheap labor from us, hey, they'll just send headhunters south of the borders and import them!!! which they are doing.
[edit on 14-9-2006 by d awnstar]
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Ummm,first, let me start out by stating that I am a male. Secondly, let me just say that I think this survey or whatever it was is total garbage. All one has to do is look at a high school's A and B honor roll to know that females, at least academically, tend to be much smarter than males. The ratio is something like 3:1 or possibly 4:1 in favor of females. I mean, come on,guys...deep down you know it...women are smarter. P.S: They have proven over and over and over again that brain size has no relevance on intelligence.
[edit on 11-9-2006 by SpeakerofTruth]
Originally posted by dgtempe
Really?
My husband thinks he's pretty smart too. Too bad he cant cook a meal, he cant wash dishes, he cant take the garbage out, he doesnt know how to go food shopping, or how to wash and dry clothes either.
In other words, Mr Dgtempe is a nobody without me.
Originally posted by nanna_of_6
Originally posted by dgtempe
Really?
My husband thinks he's pretty smart too. Too bad he cant cook a meal, he cant wash dishes, he cant take the garbage out, he doesnt know how to go food shopping, or how to wash and dry clothes either.
In other words, Mr Dgtempe is a nobody without me.
mine's the same way, except he can do everything yours can't do,....but mine just doesn't do it unless I'm sick or not feeling well,, but when he does........... he only does it, one thing at a time and it takes forever, whereas I do it all at the same time which has me moving in different directions , but I agree with you dgtempe mine would be lost without me too
This basic anatomical difference, by itself, leads to rather strong differences in priorities between men and women. In addition, men and women clearly have different programming in other parts of their brains. For example, men are much more aggressive, in general, than women, while women tend to be much more nurturing. Men are more individualistic, while women are more social. Men tend to rely more on rational thought, while women rely more on feelings. These observations are generalizations, or course, but they are fairly obvious. You can see these tendencies in children at play. Girls play with dolls and work with each other socially, while boys wage mock wars with one another. Neither mode is "better" than the other. They are simply different, and they have their own places. For example, you cannot deal socially with a wild tiger who is attacking your village, so an aggressive approach works better. On the other hand, an aggressive approach does not work at all with children.