It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I meant things would be different had Britain stayed completely out of the Asian and Middle Eastern regions. No crusades. No occupation. No drug harvesting, no raping, no pillaging, and no plundering. The situation now would of course be different had none of this happened, and that's not really open for debate.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
ofcource they want freedom their fighting for it tooth and nail, that's why so many americans are dying.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
The only Iraqies the resistance kills, are collaborators who actively work the the occupation, only security forces, army, police, death squads such as the badrbrigades/interior ministry, and the politicians.
f you wanna get technical, we already won the war. We bombed, we invaded, we took their leader and instated a new government. American wins, FATALITY!
Uhuh, so that includes those in mosques, markets, funerals, as well as people just walking by?
Originally posted by Astygia
...but I'm not the only ex-soldier (or current soldier) that realizes we were a tool, and that's a disgusting feeling.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
No it doesn't.
When a mosque or a market is bombed, most likely it is the occupation forces trying to spark secterianism and civil war, divided and conquer you know the drill. They did it to lebanon and now iraq.
As for people walking on the street, why don't you ask your soldiers. When we hear on the news "1 US soldier and 7 civilians killed due to IED," or "caught in the crossfire".
We'll know it's because after sustaining an attack your gunho cowardly troops fired indiscreminantly in the crowds around them, or maybe it was that they raped a 14 year old girl then massacred her whole family before burning her remains, and then have the news cover it up nicely for them saying it was an IED.
or have you forgotten about haditha? Your tired old lies aren't going to wash with me.
A videotape taken by an Iraqi showed the aftermath of the alleged attack: a blood-smeared bedroom floor and bits of what appear to be human flesh and bullet holes on the walls.
The video, obtained by Time magazine, was broadcast a day after town residents told The Associated Press that American troops entered homes on Nov. 19 and shot dead 15 members of two families, including a 3-year-old girl, after a roadside bomb killed a U.S. Marine.
...
U.S. military officials later confirmed that the version of events was wrong.
"there was no firefight, there was no IED (improvised explosive device) that killed these innocent people. Our troops overreacted because of the pressure on them, and they killed innocent civilians in cold blood.".
Originally posted by Ziusudra
I've told you this before, Rich, but you really need to start including the UK in such thread titles, especially as you're British. A little side mention halfway down the page doesn't really do us justice, does it now?
So when we hear that civilians where killed an IED or "caught in the crossfire" we know deltaboy, that it was your soldiers that killed them.
As for the supposed "suicide bomber", that your defunked media keeps retorting, their just relaying what the generals and the collaborators told them to say, they don't have a shred of evidence to back it up, not a name not a body, and i dare you to contradict me.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
I see you don't really know enough about the situation deltaboy to understand what i'm saying.
-Syrian Sister.
We'll know it's because after sustaining an attack your gunho cowardly troops fired indiscreminantly in the crowds around them, or maybe it was that they raped a 14 year old girl then massacred her whole family before burning her remains, and then have the news cover it up nicely for them saying it was an IED.
Originally posted by deltaboyAnd why are so many Iraqis getting killed by these so called freedom fighters than American military personnel?
We took an interesting phone call today from an official at the Baghdad morgue. We get these calls every day – a daily tally of the violence. But this one was particularly sobering.
It turns out the official toll of violent deaths in August was just revised upwards to 1535 from 550, tripling the total. Now, we’re depressingly used to hearing about deaths here, so much so that the numbers can be numbing. But this means that a much-publicized drop-off in violence in August – heralded by both the Iraqi government and the US military as a sign that a new security effort in Baghdad was working -- apparently didn’t exist.
Originally posted by deltaboy
Next time seperate between 2 different events where Army personnel raped and murder a family, and the other in Haditha where Marines killed the family after an IED attack...Okay?
Originally posted by rich23
I know it's much more fun to look at the "sectarian killings" than to take responsibility for the mess the US has made of Iraq, but the US bears DIRECT responsibility for a number of these deaths. Why?
Originally posted by rich23
But Saddam, remember, was a secularist, and for many years under his rule, Sunni and Shia lived together without conflict. True, the Sunnis got the government jobs, but the Shia weren't persecuted
However, with a few well-placed bombs and some death squad activity (both of which I would submit were orchestrated by the US and UK), resentment and violence have finally begun to take hold in Iraq. Yes, there may have been Sunni and Shia conflict in other countries, but after the occupation the two sides came together to resist the occupiers. It was this unification that had to be stopped.
Originally posted by deltaboy
Uhuh, well it seems we should just go back to Saddam's history dealing with the Shiites before you assume that he didn't prosecute them. If you want info about it, just ask please.