It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"The secretary of defense continued to push on us ... that everything we write in our plan has to be the idea that we are going to go in, we're going to take out the regime, and then we're going to leave," Scheid said. "We won't stay."
Scheid said the planners continued to try "to write what was called Phase 4," or the piece of the plan that included post-invasion operations like occupation.
Even if the troops didn't stay, "at least we have to plan for it," Scheid said.
"I remember the secretary of defense saying that he would fire the next person that said that," Scheid said. "We would not do planning for Phase 4 operations, which would require all those additional troops that people talk about today.
"He said we will not do that because the American public will not back us if they think we are going over there for a long war."
Originally posted by rich23
I'd agree with Syrian Sister's comment about the insignificant pet dog. That's what Blair has turned us into. At least Harold Wilson kept us out of Vietnam.
Face it, we were dragged into this war against the will of the population at large. And by going against the will of their peoples, Blair and Aznar were labelled "courageous". Yeah, with other people's lives at stake, it's easy to be courageous.
We were not dragged into anything, Blair wanted this War too, and his reasons certainly were not limited to cuddling up to George Bush. Are you not familiar with British contracts in Iraq and surrounding areas? Do you not understand that oiling the cogs of the war machine in such a manner as we are seeing today was a British trait long before it was an American trait? Do you understand geopolitics, or the benefits our Government and those who will replace them will receive from what appear to be permanent Military bases in Iraq? We're not an insignificant puppy dog at all, we're part of this thing, and Blair and his contingent of Bastards are furthering the Globalist agenda just as the Bu#es are. Your suggestions and your lack of any mention of the British role in this War are laughable. We are fighting in this war, our soldiers are dying, and if America is losing, we certainly are too.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
Your right, britian does have it's own agenda, but so does every country in the whole world. Your government follows america around because it thinks it stands to benefit from it It just so happens that the capitalists traitors in the british govt don't mind turning their country into a lacky to meet the ends of big business.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
but i'm aware of britians history, and it wouldn't be fair of me to refer to it as a mindless puppet, it's just as ruthless and evil as the US imperialists, perhaps even smarter, still though, not as powerful for the time being.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
That's where my dog euphomism comes in, i guess i use it inorder to inspire rage in the hearts of those british patriotic enough to want some dignity for their country.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
I do understand what your saynig, but i don't think rich and i actually disagree with you. Perhaps i over simplified, i assure you it was not my intention to white wash anything.
'm a little sorry for being so confrontational to you, but you make claims when you aren't even there.
I've seen men detonate themselves in a crowd of civilians,
www.iraq-war.ru...
A car bomb has exploded in a central Baghdad square killing five people and wounding seven, an interior ministry official said.
A bomber set off hidden explosives inside a public bus in in Al Tayaran square in the Bab-al-Sharji area at about 11.40am (0740 GMT) on Friday, police Major Mohamed Younis said.
The blast occurred as the minibus was parked at a bustling bus station in the square.
There were conflicting accounts of the bomber's fate, however.
While Younis said the bomber detonated a belt of explosives strapped to his body beneath his clothes, eyewitnesses said they saw the man leave the bus minutes before it exploded.
Shopkeeper Nadhem Hassan said he saw a man "enter the bus and leave it very quickly", adding that he saw six burnt bodies in the vehicle.
"A man left a bag in a minibus shortly after he had boarded. It exploded just after he left," a police officer said. "Five people were killed and seven others wounded."
The war was won when Saddam was taken. Ever since it's been an insurgency and civil war. Face that fact.
Farhan Ali, 52, a shepherd from the village, said insurgents told him to clear out of an area on a busy dirt road from Abu Ghraib to Smailat because they had planted a bomb in a cardboard carton that was set to blow up next to the foot patrol. "All the people in the area knew about it," he said. "The insurgents asked us to stay out of the road."
Ali's account, if accurate, shows how entrenched insurgents have become in local communities, where they target U.S. forces in broad daylight.
"All of us were just watching," Ali said. "There were a bunch of kids standing away from the road expecting and watching to see an explosion."http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A60832-2005Jan9?printer
The following is a bad machine translation of a statement made by the
communist resistance of iraq, sighting that the CIA is behind attacks
against civilians.
Iraqi Communists assure that CIA is behind the indiscriminate attacks
Rebelion
The Union of the Iraqian people, organization who proclaims her opposition
to the American military occupation, has accused the Central Agency of
Intelligence (CIA) of the United States to be behind the attacks in Iraq
To thus he has affirmed today in press conference in the Spanish city of
Cordova the spokesman it of the Union of the Iraqian People, Jousif
Hamdan, that has assured that the Iraqian resistance to the occupation,
to which the Communists support and collaboration, "is being
disqualified" by the United States when tying it with the indiscriminate
attacks, whereas, in fact, "when there are dead civilians it must to the
action of the company". Hamdan, which he makes a tour by Andalusia to the
object to present the version the Iraqian Communists on the conflict in
which its country is immersed, has explained that the company is the
person in charge of the organization and actions that they execute.
The spokesman of the Union of the Iraqian People has clarified in addition
that the resistance foreigners of islamista cut do not form, but is
integrated "in a 99 percent by Iraqi and he is not suní, since they want
to make believe the Americans", being the military (350.000) of the
previous army of Iraq those who largely compose it, along with Muslim and
nationalistic Iraqians (of the Baas party), in addition to Communists,
forming what Hamdan has denominated the "Muslim and Democratic Front of
Iraq", that looks for "its freedom".
Automatical Translation (poor)
www.iraq-war.ru...
Original untranslated text below (in spanish)
www.rebelion.org...
I didn't say Britain has its own agenda, though, I'm saying our agenda is that of the Globalist Elite, just like it is in America. We're not following America around, how the hell can one follow oneself around? Besides, where are you from, and why are you trying to tell me what my Government is doing? Do you think you know better, or something?
You clearly don't understand. Nice try, though, I guess.
You're kidding, right? If you just called me a patriot trying to solicit dignity for my country on a joke like ATS I'm not going to be pleased.
If you're just getting snotty now because I haven't replied to your damn u2u then I should make you aware that I am not able reply to or send u2u's until I have 20 or more ATS points.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
You're kidding, right? If you just called me a patriot trying to solicit dignity for my country on a joke like ATS I'm not going to be pleased.
Well, it wasn't aimed at you personally.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
If you're just getting snotty now because I haven't replied to your damn u2u then I should make you aware that I am not able reply to or send u2u's until I have 20 or more ATS points.
I'm not being snooty (or atleast i hope) and the thought didn't cross my mind about the reply, it's not like i sent you a question, i just hoped you'd read what i wrote, even if you dislike me, i still respect you and your posts.
But i thankyou for bringnig to my attention why you couldn't reply, it's a nice gesture.
Originally posted by Ziusudra
You leave me with no other alternative but to inform you that you do not know what you're talking about in regards to your own Nation.
We were not dragged into anything, Blair wanted this War too,
and his reasons certainly were not limited to cuddling up to George Bush. What an absurd media-esque whitewash of affairs. Are you not familiar with British contracts in Iraq and surrounding areas?
Do you not understand that oiling the cogs of the war machine in such a manner as we are seeing today was a British trait long before it was an American trait?
Do you understand geopolitics, or the benefits our Government and those who will replace them will receive from what appear to be permanent Military bases in Iraq?
Your suggestions and your lack of any mention of the British role in this War are laughable.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
I've seen little boys torn up thanks to your "liberation" , one stands out ni my mind in particular, he was one of the bystanders that was gunned down by a US helicopter, angry that Iraqies where celebrating around a burnt out humvee. I have an image here of half his body, and another one of his dismembered leg. The blood of iraq Astygia lies soley on your hands.
Originally posted by nephyx
plenty of radical muslims are dead. looks like a winner to me.
Originally posted by nephyx
In a time of war, it probably isnt a good idea to stand around burnt out humvees and celebrate. seems like common sense parenting to me.
Fallujah Under Threat Yet Again
By: Dahr Jamail and Ali al-Fadhily on: 12.09.2006 [09:13] (286 reads)
(4484 bytes) [c] Print
Fallujah Under Threat Yet Again
* Inter Press Service*
Dahr Jamail and Ali al-Fadhily
* FALLUJAH, Sep 11 (IPS) - After enduring two major assaults, Fallujah is
under threat from U.S. forces again, residents say.*
"They destroyed our city twice and they are threatening us a third
time," 52-year-old Ahmed Dhahy told IPS in Fallujah, the Sunni-dominated
city 50km west of Baghdad.
.....
Fallujah was heavily bombed in April 2004 and again in November that
year. The attacks destroyed 75 percent of city infrastructure and left
more than 5,000 dead, according to local non-governmental groups.
dahrjamailiraq.com...
Originally posted by nephyx
Also syrian, despite all the good points you have made here, One thing I Have a hard time swallowing is that all these so called 'Suicide bombings' and 'Car bombings' are a result of psyops and the cia trying to stir up sectarian violence.
Originally posted by rich23
Yes please.
And I believe that Iraq was different to some extent because of the secularism that Saddam imposed. I'm not saying everything in the garden was rosy, but that he kept the lid on long enough that people just got on with getting along rather than becoming hung up on religious differences.
Situation Called Dire in West Iraq
Anbar Is Lost Politically, Marine Analyst Says
By Thomas E. Ricks
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, September 11, 2006; A01
The chief of intelligence for the Marine Corps in Iraq recently filed an unusual secret report concluding that the prospects for securing that country's western Anbar province are dim and that there is almost nothing the U.S. military can do to improve the political and social situation there, said several military officers and intelligence officials familiar with its contents.
The officials described Col. Pete Devlin's classified assessment of the dire state of Anbar as the first time that a senior U.S. military officer has filed so negative a report from Iraq.
...Devlin reports that there are no functioning Iraqi government institutions in Anbar, leaving a vacuum that has been filled by the insurgent group al-Qaeda in Iraq, which has become the province's most significant political force, said the Army officer, who has read the report. Another person familiar with the report said it describes Anbar as beyond repair; a third said it concludes that the United States has lost in Anbar.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
i live in the west, so it's impossible to be under propaganda, since i get just a bias from the western media, that it balances out.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
I belive in my people, and i belive in the patriots who stand up or occupation.
They aren't bad people, there just out there fighting for what they belive in, the last thing they would do is hurt their own people, not only because it's wrong, but also because it would be handing a victory over to the americans.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
Wether the US/britain is behind most of the bombings of civilians (they where already caught once trying to do it in basra, remember the brits brought in tanks to get them out of prison), or wether it's their puppets in al Qaeda and the death squads badr brigades, i can't be entirely sure.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
Either way, it's nothing to do with the resistance.
Originally posted by Mdv2
The same applies for Muslim radicals, I always wonder why they use Western products, while they terrible hate our world.
So what you basically mean is that it's a good thing to see Shiites killing Sunnis and the other way around?
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
...the last thing they would do is hurt their own people, not only because it's wrong, but also because it would be handing a victory over to the americans.
The US army isn't out there to disturb any Iraqis from living their lives.
Again, I disagree with the invasion, but the coalition soldiers have only been ordered to secure the country, nothing more nothing less (excluding incidents).
That's a vital difference compared with the situation in Israel, where hundreds of thousands Palestinians are being humiliated, killed, tortured, and chased from their lands and homes for the only reason of Israel trying to expand their land.
Back it up that most bombings have been executed by the coalition forces, otherwise I reserve the right to define it as poor propaganda
Originally posted by rich23
So... why do you use Middle Eastern oil?
So what you basically mean is that it's a good thing to see Shiites killing Sunnis and the other way around?
Originally posted by rich23
Funnily enough, that's exactly the opposite meaning from the quotation you took from Syrian Sister.
The US army isn't out there to disturb any Iraqis from living their lives.
Originally posted by rich23
The whole point of this thread is to explore the idea that they cannot and never could secure the country - remember Rumsfeld threatened to fire any of his planners who wanted to discuss the aftermath of the invasion?
Originally posted by rich23
No. This isn't about land... exactly. It's about the neo-conservatives ensuring US control of the last remaining oil reserves on the planet, asset-stripping the country of Iraq, preventing the Iraqis from using any seeds to grow food except those manufactured by Monsanto, and above all ensuring that they don't trade their oil in Euros.
Originally posted by rich23
Very different from the situation in Israel. Or is it?
Back it up that most bombings have been executed by the coalition forces, otherwise I reserve the right to define it as poor propaganda
Originally posted by rich23
although US citizens might find it hard to believe that they'd get up to these kind of tricks, those of US outside the sphere of influence of US propaganda and who have some grasp of CIA history have no problem accepting that this is an entirely realistic proposition.