It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by intrepid
I recommend to EVERYONE to read that link. I can't believe that your arguement is so weak as to have post it. shots, I recommend that you TOO reread that link. It's proving MY point, not yours. :shk:
You poo-poo the degredation that these people have been SUBJECTED to and equate it to some foolish VOLUNTARY college initiation.
Originally posted by shots
How so??? I posted it only to show that the IRC visits ever 6-8 wks I realize the rest of the story relates to what some human rights group gibberish nothing more most of which has just been alleged and not proven I might add. Next time I will make sure I do not use one that contains and HR issues if that will make you happy. I also used it because it was current by date so you could not say well that is old and ask me to furnish more current info so I saved you that step
You poo-poo the degredation that these people have been SUBJECTED to and equate it to some foolish VOLUNTARY college initiation.
But I do not think it is degredation while you do and No it was not voluntary it was mandatory if I did not do it I could not get in the sorority.
Originally posted by intrepid
I didn't know you were a woman. The internet is SO annonymous. It's comforting to know that these people went into this internment with the same goals that you did, Welcome to Prisoner Prisoner Prisoner. Hell of a sorority. VERY exclusive. shots, would you like to join that one?
Originally posted by subz
And there in lies the rub, show me a declaration of War on Afghanistan from the United States congress. While you're at it show me a declaration of War on Iraq and on Terror. Good luck Now if there is no declaration of war there can be no formal end of hostilities.
No, I believe it says "In all criminal prosecutions". The part about the jury having come from the state where the alleged crime was committed belies your founding father's greatest wish that the United States would not assume the role of Global Policeman.
Originally posted by shots
They used the war powers act to allow our forces to be used there was no formal declaration of war so what you ask is impossible. And you would be wrong when you state there can be no formal end of hostilities. The Korean war was not declared and it ended in the signing of a armistice that ended hostilities.
Originally posted by shots
But in this case there will be no jury it will be by military courts marshal under the UCMJ.
I hope you realize you are comparing apples to oranges here because our civilian courts and military courts are not the same although you seem to think they are.
Originally posted by subz
The Korean War was not a true war but a police action carried out by the United Nations.
I ask you, who could represent Terror in any formal ceremony marking the end of hostilities? How could this possibly occur? Im interested in your answer to this.
But they arent soldiers so why are they being court martialed? They are classed as illegal combatants, not soldiers. They are alleged civilian criminals, so why the Court Martials?
Soldier
1. (n.) One who engages in a combat or struggle:
combatant
belligerent
brawler
fighter
militant
warrior
contender
legionnaire
sol·dier (sljr)
n.
1. One who serves in an army.
2. An enlisted person or a noncommissioned officer.
3. An active, loyal, or militant follower of an organization.
Source
Originally posted by intrepid
I guess I should take it as a compliment, you're only ignored when you've beaten the opposing arguement.
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by intrepid
I guess I should take it as a compliment, you're only ignored when you've beaten the opposing arguement.
What are you talking about? I did not see anything in your last post to me that deserved a reply. If you are going to ask a question kindly form it as a question, one word with a ? mark behind it is not a question to me.
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by shots
How so??? I posted it only to show that the IRC visits ever 6-8 wks I realize the rest of the story relates to what some human rights group gibberish nothing more most of which has just been alleged and not proven I might add. Next time I will make sure I do not use one that contains and HR issues if that will make you happy. I also used it because it was current by date so you could not say well that is old and ask me to furnish more current info so I saved you that step
Human Rights gibberish? I thought, by your posts, that the GC gaurunteed humane treatment. Now it's gibberish?
Current? I'm glad that you are pointing out that NOTHING has changed.
You poo-poo the degredation that these people have been SUBJECTED to and equate it to some foolish VOLUNTARY college initiation.
Originally posted by shotsBut I do not think it is degredation while you do and No it was not voluntary it was mandatory if I did not do it I could not get in the sorority.
Originally posted bt intrepidIt's comforting to see that YOU feel fine withholding humane treatment of these people, yes, they are still people, while stating that they are getting GC treatment.
I didn't know you were a woman. The internet is SO annonymous. It's comforting to know that these people went into this internment with the same goals that you did, Welcome to Prisoner Prisoner Prisoner. Hell of a sorority. VERY exclusive. shots, would you like to join that one?
It is clear what you two are doing, but I will not relent. Gang up all you want, I will stand by my convictions irregardless what you think.
[edit on 7/7/2006 by shots]
Originally posted by intrepid
You want a question? Why don't you answer my last post, that I quoted here?
Originally posted by shots
I realize it was not a true war but it still ending with the signing of an armistice didn't it?
Originally posted by shots
One of their leaders of course.
Originally posted by shots
Yes they are go look up the definition of a soldier. Here I will save you the time
Originally posted by Intrepid
Well, I'm glad it's clear to you, it wasn't to me. I never u2u'd subz, he probably wouldn't answer anyways, we're not Buds, I'm encouraged that YOU will "stand by your convictions regardless......."
Originally posted by subz
You arent really showing much of an understanding of how terrorists operate. Al-Qaeda is not a coherent and regimented network. It was created by the FBI to prosecute Osama Bin Laden in absentia for the African embassy bombings using laws originally penned for combating the Mafia.
So I ask you, if there is no clear cut command structure to even Al-Qaeda who can sign an armistice or an end to hostilities?
What makes you think any of these people will honour an armistice?
Then why are they denied their rights under the Geneva Conventions and dubbed "illegal combatants"? You cant have it both ways, you cant deny them their rights of treatment as soldiers because you say they are "illegal combatants" and then say they can be detained as PoW's until the war is over.
Pick a definition and stick with it goddamnit.
Originally posted by shots
Oh, come on now, bringing in some conspiracy theory will not work here, so let's use known facts from government and major media sources only (no conspiracy sites allowed) if you do not mine.
Two Minutes Hate
In George Orwell's novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, the Two Minutes Hate is a daily period in which Party members of the society of Oceania must watch a film depicting The Party's enemies (notably Emmanuel Goldstein and his followers) and express their hatred for them and the principles of democracy.
The film and its accompanying auditory and visual cues (which include a grinding noise that Orwell describes as "of some monstrous machine running without oil") are a form of brainwashing to Party members, attempting to whip them into a frenzy of hatred and loathing for Emmanuel Goldstein and the current enemy superstate.
Al-Qaeda, the Mythic Enemy from Le Figaro
From then on the demonization of al-Qaeda is very practical. A superb media invention, security haute couture label, consensual poster for the bounty-hunters of another age, a crude, but effective, propaganda: if al-Qaeda didn't exist, it would have to be invented. Since September 11, 2001 the al-Qaeda label has surreptitiously slid from designating a criminal band with Bin Laden at their head, to specifying a high-tech organization, to finally qualifying a planetary network: al-Qaeda has "CNNized" itself, like the al-Jezira channel which serves its communications. Al-Qaeda is everywhere, therefore, nowhere. Just as the hidden Imam, Bin Laden, simultaneously dead and alive, is behind every unexplained bomb explosion. Fortunately, his organization is there to give sense to all the world's disorders.
The phantasm of a planetary, pyramidal al-Qaeda, that of a new orchestration or of an International similar in all respects to Comintern's, is in the process of justifying the biggest American military-strategic redeployment effected since the end of the Second World War. The endless war against terror has replaced the war against the Communist monster. Consequently, it's not surprising to see old U.S.S.R. experts redeploying their old scholasticism on the pretext of an Islamist violence about which they know nothing, applying anachronistic Kremlinology schemas to it. These American neo-conservative ideological go-betweens stand guard on the old continent. For the American Empire, it's important that the al-Qaeda mythology persist. To survive, the empire needs an enemy to its measure and to make war on: Endless War.
Originally posted by shots
Oh, come on now, bringing in some conspiracy theory will not work here, so let's use known facts from government and major media sources only (no conspiracy sites allowed) if you do not mine.
For starters news.bbc.co.uk...
Or
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by shots
I already told you once, one of their leaders. Pick up any major paper and they will list two names now. Osama bin Laden and Aymen al-Zawahiri either of them will do just fine.
Originally posted by shots
No one can guarantee anything all you can do is hope. How many treaties did it take before the wars between France, Spain and the UK ended their ongoing wars?
Originally posted by shots
Excuse me??? I think you have me confused with someone else I never called them "illegal combatants" that would be you. As for their treatment they are being afforded treatment under the Geneva convention In fact I would dare say they are getting better treatment then most other countries would afford them yes they even have air conditioning imagine that
The camp has drawn strong criticism both in the U.S. and world-wide for its detainment of prisoners without trial, and allegations of torture. Many detainees are held by the United States to be illegal combatants, and thus not entitled to the protections of the Geneva Convention.
Originally posted by shots
Hey it is not me changing the definitions that would be you, so you may want to follow your own suggestion
Originally posted by Souljah
Well I will tell you something - I have this Hunch about you, that you are not here just to "Debate", but to spread certain propaganda, and I also think that you are getting payed for that. Now we all know for a Fact, that there are several Undercover agents in the Media and on the popular Forum boards such as this - and I have you also in my Sights.
Originally posted by subz
Sorry shots but you are highly deluded. The offer of a truce with Al-Qaeda was rejected by your government.
Originally posted by shots
Of course it was. They made the offer while making threats. It was not a genuine offer, something you failed to see.
Originally posted by subz
Oh you mean like "you've got 48hrs to leave the country or you'll be invaded"?
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by intrepid
You want a question? Why don't you answer my last post, that I quoted here?
I will be more then happy to when you put your exact points in the form of a well structured and intelligent question.
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by shots
How so??? I posted it only to show that the IRC visits ever 6-8 wks I realize the rest of the story relates to what some human rights group gibberish nothing more most of which has just been alleged and not proven I might add. Next time I will make sure I do not use one that contains and HR issues if that will make you happy. I also used it because it was current by date so you could not say well that is old and ask me to furnish more current info so I saved you that step
Human Rights gibberish? I thought, by your posts, that the GC gaurunteed humane treatment. Now it's gibberish?
Current? I'm glad that you are pointing out that NOTHING has changed.
You poo-poo the degredation that these people have been SUBJECTED to and equate it to some foolish VOLUNTARY college initiation.
But I do not think it is degredation while you do and No it was not voluntary it was mandatory if I did not do it I could not get in the sorority.
It's comforting to see that YOU feel fine withholding humane treatment of these people, yes, they are still people, while stating that they are getting GC treatment.
I didn't know you were a woman. The internet is SO annonymous. It's comforting to know that these people went into this internment with the same goals that you did, Welcome to Prisoner Prisoner Prisoner. Hell of a sorority. VERY exclusive. shots, would you like to join that one?
Originally posted by intrepid
FOR THE THIRD TIME, in small words, Do.... you.... think.... that.... the.... GC.... statutes.... have.... been.... granted.... to..... these.... detainees?....
Was that slow enough?
Oh, and don't go on about "a speedy trial", you were the one that brought up the GC to start with.