It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by shots
When I went to college I had to wear pink undies during an initiation and that also never hurt me
The same goes for standing nude in front of others, they made me do that also in college during the initiation and it never hurt me one bit. Rumor has it my wife of almost 50 years...
Originally posted by shots
Yes I do think they have been granted the rights they are entitled too. I would also venture to guess the treatment they are getting from the US is also under far superior conditions then if they were held by Afgans or Iraqis.
Originally posted by intrepid
What's your point then? That was a question. You are comparing the standards of the GC to the treatment of detainees of other countries? That's another question.
Originally posted by shots
Not really in the form of a question but I will answer it. I was not comparing them simply pointing out the differance between US standards and others.
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
(a little off-topic, your honour, but it goes to credibility)
50 years ago all underwear was white. Therefore, are we to assume you attended college as an adult re-entry student, or that you are a little confused with your time periods, or that you are lying?
Originally posted by shots
Not really in the form of a question but I will answer it. I was not comparing them simply pointing out the differance between US standards and others.
Originally posted by intrepid So, you're saying that the GC only applies to the extent that the opposing force uses? Still, a 3rd question.
No not at all, I think you are trying to trick me into saying what you want and it will not work.
Originally posted by intrepid
No, I'm trying to get the truth out there and YOU are afraid of showing the truth.
OR, show me the truth then. The ball's in your court.
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
(a little off-topic, your honour, but it goes to credibility)
50 years ago all underwear was white. Therefore, are we to assume you attended college as an adult re-entry student, or that you are a little confused with your time periods, or that you are lying?
Nope I am not confused that would appear to be you When in doubt use google kw vintage underwear and you will find links to peach, black white and various other colors for sale right now on eBay never used no less
Vintage Tap Pants Peach and black
Well there goes your creditability since it was clear you did not know what you were talking about.
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
Which would make you nearly 70 now, by any rough estimate.
Originally posted by shots
Be happy to when you put a question to me in the form of a question. You do know how to do that don't you? no offense meant here, but the way you sturcture your questions leaves a lot to be desired. I will be more then happy to answer with true answers if and when you put a question to me directly in the form of a well structured question. And no I was not avoiding anything
Originally posted by intrepid
I've come across this with both neo cons and ultra libs, you both play this game of, "I don't know what you're asking of me". Your incredible powers of disimination go to pot when asked to face the issues. I'm not sweating it though, the thinking individual is out there and they are seeing this.
Thanks for playing.
Originally posted by shots
I am not playing any game I have tried to give you honest answers, but I will chalk that one up in the win column since you gave up
[edit on 7/9/2006 by shots]
Originally posted by intrepid
Sorry for the 1 liner but it says it all.
You ready to go Head 2 Head?
Personally, I can't wait.
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
Which standards are those? The double ones?
You know, where the US State Department annual report criticises China for its continued use of detention without trial?
Or the one where the US demands Aung San Suu Kyi be released from years of house arrest?
Or the one where the US accuses Cuba of holding political prisoners?
Or the one where the US says Belarus routinely violates the human rights of its citizens?
Originally posted by shots
Nah Subz already sent me a u2 regarding a debate and I am not interested in any fancy titles or awards. But thanks for asking.
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
Which standards are those? The double ones?
You know, where the US State Department annual report criticises China for its continued use of detention without trial?
Or the one where the US demands Aung San Suu Kyi be released from years of house arrest?
Or the one where the US accuses Cuba of holding political prisoners?
Or the one where the US says Belarus routinely violates the human rights of its citizens?
Those situations are not the same. Too the best of my knowledge they were not captured on a battle field with guns in their hands while shooting at people. Sad that you cannot see the difference.
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
As for your other assertion. I want you to tell me how many of the detainees at Camp X-ray were "captured on a battle field with guns in their hands while shooting at people."
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
As for your other assertion. I want you to tell me how many of the detainees at Camp X-ray were "captured on a battle field with guns in their hands while shooting at people."
Now since you seem to have all the facts, why don't you tell us how many it was? And please be exact. Names addresses and telephone numbers would also help
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
You made the claim, you back it up.
And while you're at it, tell me how many Germans, Italians or Japanese "collaborators" were imprisoned in the UK, the US or Australia after being picked up in their home country during WW2.