Didn't see Australia in there. Didn't see anything about "collaborators" being transported from Europe to the new world during the years 1914-1918
and 1939-1945.
OMG are you internet impaired, or just impaired?
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
You said it and now you can't defend it.
Just nazi collorators
The pursuit of Nazi collaborators refers to the post-WWII pursuit and apprehension of individuals who were not citizens of the Third Reich at the outbreak of World War II and collaborated with the Nazi regime during the war.
1 Background
2 Means of pursuit
3 Controversial aspects
4 Pursuit in specific countries
4.1 Argentina
4.2 Australia
4.3 Belgium
4.4 Czechoslovakia
4.5 France
4.6 Netherlands
4.7 Norway
4.8 Poland
4.9 Soviet Union
4.10 United Kingdom
4.11 Yugoslavia
5 Middle East
6 See also
7 External links
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
You said it and now you can't defend it.
Oh but I can defend it. I just thought you had the know how to look it up, but since you do not here you go. click on the linky
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
You made the claim, you back it up.
Just nazi collorators
The pursuit of Nazi collaborators refers to the post-WWII pursuit and apprehension of individuals who were not citizens of the Third Reich at the outbreak of World War II and collaborated with the Nazi regime during the war.
Originally posted by shots
I am also sure that some were picked up after being turned in as collaborators by others and then detained as were many during wwI and wwII.
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
And while you're at it, tell me how many Germans, Italians or Japanese "collaborators" were imprisoned in the UK, the US or Australia after being picked up in their home country during WW2.
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
You have singularly failed ot do so.
Your analogy was erroneous.
Originally posted by shots
I am also sure that some were picked up after being turned in as collaborators by others and then detained as were many during wwI and wwII.
Now you can rant and rave all you want, but as far as I am concerned, I say if the highest court in the US considers some of them as collaborators; that is just what the are. I am sure they are far more then qualified then you are.
The following decisions were some of the majorU.S. Supreme Court rulings during the 2003-04 term:
Guantanamo: Ruled 6-3 that foreign-born battlefield captives, held at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba as alleged collaborators with the Taliban or al Qaeda, have the right to go to U.S. courts to challenge their confinement.
Rulings by the US Supreme Court

Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
Collaborators were not captured or arrested by allied forces or "turned in" to allied forces and subsequently shipped overseas for extended imprisonment without reference to the Geneva Convention until 1949.
Your analogy is erroneous.
You can't do that. Because it didn't happen. Camp X-ray is a brand new circumstance, there is no precedent.
In Mississippi, suspected spies, collaborators and sympathizers were housed at Fort Massachusetts on West Ship Island.
Source NPS
They were crammed into freight cars and shipped to central Asia and Siberia. According to historian Timothy Snyder's work on Volhynia, Soviet occupiers and their local collaborators deported as many as 70,000 or 20 percent of the entire Polish population between 1939 and 1941.[13]
uncpress.unc.edu...
"We had essentially the civilian elements of the Japanese occupation from Japan, Saipan, and those members of the local people who were thought to have been possibly implicated (for collaboration with the enemy)," Savage said. "We had a cumbersome, awkward and slow procedure but finally they were released. Only a very few were shipped back to Saipan."
...
"There were also a number of women, the so-called comfort troops. They were a pathetic lot, totally unaware of what their rights were. They were later sent to Hawaii prisoner-of-war camps," he said.
www.nps.gov...
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
Collaborators were not captured or arrested by allied forces or "turned in" to allied forces and subsequently shipped overseas for extended imprisonment without reference to the Geneva Convention until 1949.
Your analogy is erroneous.
You can't do that. Because it didn't happen. Camp X-ray is a brand new circumstance, there is no precedent.
Yes there was, and it would be your analogy that is in error.
In Mississippi, suspected spies, collaborators and sympathizers were housed at Fort Massachusetts on West Ship Island.
Source NPS
They were crammed into freight cars and shipped to central Asia and Siberia. According to historian Timothy Snyder's work on Volhynia, Soviet occupiers and their local collaborators deported as many as 70,000 or 20 percent of the entire Polish population between 1939 and 1941.[13]
uncpress.unc.edu...
"We had essentially the civilian elements of the Japanese occupation from Japan, Saipan, and those members of the local people who were thought to have been possibly implicated (for collaboration with the enemy)," Savage said. "We had a cumbersome, awkward and slow procedure but finally they were released. Only a very few were shipped back to Saipan."
"There were also a number of women, the so-called comfort troops. They were a pathetic lot, totally unaware of what their rights were. They were later sent to Hawaii prisoner-of-war camps," he said.
www.nps.gov...
As you can clearly see some collaborators were detained in the US, Hawaii and others were shipped to Asia & Siberia by the Russians![]()
Now what was that you were saying about there were none shipped overseas or to other countries?????
They were a pathetic lot, totally unaware of what their rights were.