It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
Yes. Let's do that.
I never stated thousands of collaborators
Oh, really?
what I said were some of them were collaorators that probably were picked up with the rest of the detaines. I also never gave any actual numbers what I said was those detained during WWII numbered in the thousands. Now you have me saying I said there were thousands of "collaborators" and I never stated that.
Let's take a little look-see, shall we?
Shots SAid
I would assume most of them, to be honest I am not sure, but I am also sure that some were picked up after being turned in as collaborators by others and then detained as were many during wwI and wwII.
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
Didn't see Australia in there. Didn't see anything about "collaborators" being transported from Europe to the new world during the years 1914-1918 and 1939-1945.
OMG are you internet impaired, or just impaired?
Originally posted by shots
How on earth you ever turned the meaning of some into me saying thousands is beyond me :shk:
Kindly read and understand what was said before commenting OK?
: Originally posted by shots
: Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
Oh no. No, no, no. You made the claim about "collaborators". I put it in context for you, you have to provide the numbers to back your claim.
Yes I did and I answered that it numbers in the thousands if you want exact numbers look them up yourself.
: Originally posted by shots
: Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
And while you're at it, tell me how many Germans, Italians or Japanese "collaborators" were imprisoned in the UK, the US or Australia after being picked up in their home country during WW2.
As for how many were held during WWII it numbers in the thousands. Don't believe me look it up.
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
You said it and now you can't defend it.
Just nazi collorators
The pursuit of Nazi collaborators refers to the post-WWII pursuit and apprehension of individuals who were not citizens of the Third Reich at the outbreak of World War II and collaborated with the Nazi regime during the war.
1 Background
2 Means of pursuit
3 Controversial aspects
4 Pursuit in specific countries
4.1 Argentina
4.2 Australia
4.3 Belgium
4.4 Czechoslovakia
4.5 France
4.6 Netherlands
4.7 Norway
4.8 Poland
4.9 Soviet Union
4.10 United Kingdom
4.11 Yugoslavia
5 Middle East
6 See also
7 External links
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
You said it and now you can't defend it.
Oh but I can defend it. I just thought you had the know how to look it up, but since you do not here you go. click on the linky
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
You made the claim, you back it up.
Just nazi collorators
The pursuit of Nazi collaborators refers to the post-WWII pursuit and apprehension of individuals who were not citizens of the Third Reich at the outbreak of World War II and collaborated with the Nazi regime during the war.
Originally posted by shots
I am also sure that some were picked up after being turned in as collaborators by others and then detained as were many during wwI and wwII.
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
And while you're at it, tell me how many Germans, Italians or Japanese "collaborators" were imprisoned in the UK, the US or Australia after being picked up in their home country during WW2.
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
You have singularly failed ot do so.
Your analogy was erroneous.
Originally posted by shots
I am also sure that some were picked up after being turned in as collaborators by others and then detained as were many during wwI and wwII.
Now you can rant and rave all you want, but as far as I am concerned, I say if the highest court in the US considers some of them as collaborators; that is just what the are. I am sure they are far more then qualified then you are.
The following decisions were some of the majorU.S. Supreme Court rulings during the 2003-04 term:
Guantanamo: Ruled 6-3 that foreign-born battlefield captives, held at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba as alleged collaborators with the Taliban or al Qaeda, have the right to go to U.S. courts to challenge their confinement.
Rulings by the US Supreme Court
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
Your analogy was erroneous.
No I think you misunderstood me. I was referring to some detainees that are now at GITMO.
Lets clarify this right now I stated
Originally posted by shots
I am also sure that some were picked up after being turned in as collaborators by others and then detained as were many during wwI and wwII.
Note the clarification that is underlined
now for the official record and check mate
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
Collaborators were not captured or arrested by allied forces or "turned in" to allied forces and subsequently shipped overseas for extended imprisonment without reference to the Geneva Convention until 1949.
Your analogy is erroneous.
You can't do that. Because it didn't happen. Camp X-ray is a brand new circumstance, there is no precedent.
In Mississippi, suspected spies, collaborators and sympathizers were housed at Fort Massachusetts on West Ship Island.
Source NPS
They were crammed into freight cars and shipped to central Asia and Siberia. According to historian Timothy Snyder's work on Volhynia, Soviet occupiers and their local collaborators deported as many as 70,000 or 20 percent of the entire Polish population between 1939 and 1941.[13]
uncpress.unc.edu...
"We had essentially the civilian elements of the Japanese occupation from Japan, Saipan, and those members of the local people who were thought to have been possibly implicated (for collaboration with the enemy)," Savage said. "We had a cumbersome, awkward and slow procedure but finally they were released. Only a very few were shipped back to Saipan."
...
"There were also a number of women, the so-called comfort troops. They were a pathetic lot, totally unaware of what their rights were. They were later sent to Hawaii prisoner-of-war camps," he said.
www.nps.gov...
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
Collaborators were not captured or arrested by allied forces or "turned in" to allied forces and subsequently shipped overseas for extended imprisonment without reference to the Geneva Convention until 1949.
Your analogy is erroneous.
You can't do that. Because it didn't happen. Camp X-ray is a brand new circumstance, there is no precedent.
Yes there was, and it would be your analogy that is in error.
In Mississippi, suspected spies, collaborators and sympathizers were housed at Fort Massachusetts on West Ship Island.
Source NPS
They were crammed into freight cars and shipped to central Asia and Siberia. According to historian Timothy Snyder's work on Volhynia, Soviet occupiers and their local collaborators deported as many as 70,000 or 20 percent of the entire Polish population between 1939 and 1941.[13]
uncpress.unc.edu...
"We had essentially the civilian elements of the Japanese occupation from Japan, Saipan, and those members of the local people who were thought to have been possibly implicated (for collaboration with the enemy)," Savage said. "We had a cumbersome, awkward and slow procedure but finally they were released. Only a very few were shipped back to Saipan."
"There were also a number of women, the so-called comfort troops. They were a pathetic lot, totally unaware of what their rights were. They were later sent to Hawaii prisoner-of-war camps," he said.
www.nps.gov...
As you can clearly see some collaborators were detained in the US, Hawaii and others were shipped to Asia & Siberia by the Russians
Now what was that you were saying about there were none shipped overseas or to other countries?????
They were a pathetic lot, totally unaware of what their rights were.