It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by grover
What I don't understand is why you have so much emotional time invested in there actually being weapons of mass destruction...its almost pathological. If I am proved wrong so be it, it wouldn't be the first time and it won't be the last; but I wonder, could you handle it if you were proved wrong? For some reason, I doubt it. I could see you on here squeaing to high heaven how .... come to think of it!
Originally posted by grover
What I don't understand is why you have so much emotional time invested in there actually being weapons of mass destruction...its almost pathological. If I am proved wrong so be it, it wouldn't be the first time and it won't be the last; but I wonder, could you handle it if you were proved wrong? For some reason, I doubt it. I could see you on here squeaing to high heaven how .... come to think of it!
Originally posted by Muaddib
or staying away from the thread...
Originally posted by df1
As reagan would say, there you go again.
It seems that everytime one of the "faux patriot" set is challenged that they want the challenger to go away. This is just a variation of the old and tired "america love it or leave it" theme.
Has this boring tactic ever actually worked for you?
Originally posted by Johnny Ohm
Grover makes a good point, and the guy after him just adds on to what Grover said. What would happen when it is proven, 100% no doubt, that Buh lied, no WMDs, to the Bush Bots? WOuld they all explode, have srokes, heart attacks, cover themselves in gas and set themselves on fire?
........................
Originally posted by grover
You have a very bad habit of twisting peoples words around to suit your arguement...you do it repeatedly, not just to me but to everyone who dares question you. I never wondered why we were dsicussing weapons of mass distruction on this thread. Get my words right damnit. No wonder I discount your opinions, if you cannot quote me or anyone else accurately and stop reading into them what you want, why the hell should I believe your other claims, just because you said them or claimed sourses....phffft!!!
Originally posted by Muaddib
Originally posted by grover
Claimed sources huh?...is that how you try to dismiss the facts?... Can you prove that the statements from Russian defectors is not true?...
[edit on 29-6-2006 by Muaddib]
and can you prove that they are? No you cannot...any more than I can prove they are wrong. And that is the rub. Big difference I know it.
Originally posted by grover
Come on Muaddib, you can do it, just stand up in front of everybody and repeat after me...."Hi my name is Muaddib and I am powerless against my tendency to fart in the wind and to act like a know it all, and it is ruining my life. I admit that in all honesty, I know no more or no less than Grover does." and afterwards we will give you your first white token. It won't hurt!!! Now there, don't you feel better?
Originally posted by grover
you probably consider ann coulter a legitimate political commentator don't you.
Intelligence officials said the 500 munitions referred to in the report were produced before the Persian Gulf War in 1991 and that they had degraded and could not be used as designed. ``There is no evidence today of any post-1991 WMD munitions,''
Originally posted by grover
Up yours Muaddib...I am far smarter than you give me credit for.
Originally posted by grover
I have never said all those people are lying. I am trying to point out, with a little bit of humor, that you, me, all of us here cherry pick the information we chose to believe, yes including YOU and yes including ME. I can admit that, it seems that you cannot.
Originally posted by grover
My references for my assertions are all matter of public record...the national media outlets, not some obscure online article....
Originally posted by grover
I note that you were incapable of admitting that you can't prove or disprove the Russian defectors story any more than I can.
Originally posted by grover
That inability on your part was what I was mocking, not you.