North American Union!!! Bush's Real Agenda???, page 3

I don't see this happening.

There are alot of people in this country that enjoy a good dose of the constitution and Bill of Rights.

Do you think Americans will give up their weapons..........
I don't, and here is why.

When the founding fathers made the constitution they were thinking far into the future. We would come to a crossroads where force for something would be needed. To keep the United States as it is. In that they made the 10 Amendments so that we are guaranteed rights as they seen fit. Unfortunately people are not seeing things as some of us are seeing. A complete and total raping of our Freedoms...

Mainly these ones.
1st, 2nd, 4th Amendments

Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Freedom of Speech, It's been disallowed for some time, People have been going to jail for people what they believe in.

Freedom of Religion, well I have heard stories of Pastors in churches getting thrown in jail for speaking for the bible.

Freedom of Press, Well this is self explanatory.. Which is why most of us get our news on the Internet rather than TV or Newspaper.

Freedom of Protest, Think back to the RNC convention in NYC, they were carting people left and right for protesting in the streets. Also Mayor Bloomberg stated the following.

"People who avail themselves of the opportunity to express themselves ... they will not abuse that privilege," he said at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice. "Because if we start to abuse our privileges, then we lose them, and nobody wants that."

-------------------

Amendment II: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

This is self explanatory, but I will add something here.

I have heard on Alex Jones that they have been taking registered weapons in IL, and as of recently in New Orleans during the Katrina incident.

There is a video floating around of this where an old woman is holding a gun saying she don't want to leave and some big tough swat guy or something tackles here and arrests her in front of cameras.
I have this video, I will try and put it on the net somewhere.

Amendment IV: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Here is an example of this right going out to sea.

www.democracynow.org.../05/08/1352248

JONATHAN LANDAY: My understanding is that the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution specifies that you must have probable cause to be able to do a search that does not violate an Americans right against unlawful searches and seizures.

MICHAEL HAYDEN: No, actually, the Fourth Amendment actually protects all of us against unreasonable search and seizure. That’s what it says.

JONATHAN LANDAY: But the measure is “probable cause,” I believe.

MICHAEL HAYDEN: The amendment says “unreasonable search and seizure.”

JONATHAN LANDAY: But does it not say “probable – “

MICHAEL HAYDEN: No.

JONATHAN LANDAY: The court standard, the legal standard --

MICHAEL HAYDEN: The amendment says, “unreasonable search and seizure.”

JONATHAN LANDAY: The legal standard is “probable cause,” General. You used the terms just a few minutes ago, “we reasonably believe,” and a FISA court, my understanding is, would not give you a warrant if you went before them and say, “We reasonably believe.” You have to go to the FISA Court or the Attorney General has to go to the FISA Court and say, “We have probable cause,” and so what many people believe, and I would like you to respond to this, is that what you've actually done is crafted a detour around the FISA Court by creating a new standard of “reasonably believe” in place of “probable cause,” because the FISA Court will not give you a warrant based on “reasonable belief.” You have to show “probable cause.” Could you respond to that, please?

MICHAEL HAYDEN: Sure. I didn't craft the authorization. I am responding to a lawful order, alright? The Attorney General has averred to the lawfulness of the order. Just to be very clear, okay, and believe me, if there is any amendment to the Constitution that employees of the National Security Agency are familiar with, it's the Fourth, and it is a “reasonableness” standard in the Fourth Amendment. And so, what you’ve raised to me, and I'm not a lawyer and don't want to become one, but what you've raised to me, in terms of quoting the Fourth Amendment, is an issue of the Constitution. The constitutional standard is “reasonable,” and we believe – I am convinced that we're lawful, because what it is we're doing is reasonable.

So I think if they decide to start taking guns off of everyone, I think there will be hell to pay. So I don't see this NWO/EU thing going on any time soon.

[edit on 7/16/2006 by ThichHeaded]