You should change your name to ASSume because that is all you have done thus far.Like many who stick by the 'official' story, all you ever do is
complain about us 'nuts' and where we get our info.Had you maybe known me in the past, you would see I devoted much time to research in the CH
thread and many others.I did not take words and theories and copy/paste them here.I did my own work.What you imply by saying I was referring to
other sites because what SMR was saying doesn’t exist can easily be found within these very forums. So, I concluded that he goes to places that only
provide one side of the story.
is that my opinion is not really my opinion....how can that be?Are you saying I cant think for myself? That what I
believe I have to have others believe for me?
People like yourself come to a place like this all upset at people such as myself who dare think the U.S. Government could do such a thing and lash
out at them.Saying they are stupid.Have no thought process and have to resort to getting bunk info from other 'nut' sites and copy/paste what they
I will say it again.There is NO PROOF a 757 AA jet hit the Pentagon.An image of a few parts and ONE chunk of silver metal does NOT justify as
What we have as so called proof:
Crappy stills from a top of the line P.O.S. CCTV cam
One tire/rim that has been shown to fit other Boeing planes ( not just 757 )
One landing gear arm that matches many others
One fan blade that has yet to be 100% proof positive to belong on a Boeing 757
One piece silver panel belonging to anything
One more thing HybridEB
You want to talk about copying word for word.... what is with your link to your site.All you did was copy other sites content and put it on yours!!!
If that aint calling the kettle black!
It has already been stated that only the two videos were released because the lawsuit filed to obtain them specifically called for “impact”
footage. Supposedly, the security camera stills are the only ones that show the actual attack on the Pentagon. There are, as you said, other videos
out there from other locations that may not show the impact but the plane flying by. Hopefully those will be released as well.
Can you please show me this lawsuit.
For one, the first video was released by no lawsuit.It was just released as a 'here ya go, there it is' video.After seeing that useless junk, THEN a
lawsuit was filed to release more ( not only stating impact ) and we ended up with the new junk we got few weeks ago.
Also, you say other videos out there from other locations that may not show the impact but the plane flying by
...... Ya think that maybe we
wanted to see THOSE the second time around? Maybe even the first time? Ya think maybe they could shut us all up by releasing THOSE ones instead?
"Oh, we're sorry, we thought you just wanted to see video of the pretty explosion"