It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

AGM 86A Cruise Missle hit pentagon PROOF!!!

page: 2
0
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 09:30 PM
link   


I see no one has answered my question, so I'll ask it again...

What does a missile need with landing gear ????






posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 09:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jedi_Master


I see no one has answered my question, so I'll ask it again...

What does a missile need with landing gear ????



And I asked, what landing gear?



posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 09:33 PM
link   
You mean to tell me you didn't follow the link I posted ???

The pics of the landing gear are there....



posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 09:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jedi_Master
You mean to tell me you didn't follow the link I posted ???

The pics of the landing gear are there....


No sorry, can you post the link?



posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 09:37 PM
link   
Go back one page in this thread to post # 2222191


Try that...



posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 09:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jedi_Master
I see no one has answered my question, so I'll ask it again...

What does a missile need with landing gear ????


Disguise, misdirection, false trail suggestion and illusion. I have an idea but can't verify, I don't if they wanted it to look like a plane add wheels.

My question is, why would they have gears down on a plane if they were crashing, it would only create drag and slow them down a tad bit.



posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 09:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jedi_Master
Go back one page in this thread to post # 2222191


Try that...

Oooh that one. Question, what's the original source of that landing gear pic?



posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 09:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by ADVISOR

Originally posted by Jedi_Master
I see no one has answered my question, so I'll ask it again...

What does a missile need with landing gear ????


My question is, why would they have gears down on a plane if they were crashing, it would only create drag and slow them down a tad bit.


Damn man who said they had gears down ???

Is that your own addition to this farce ???



posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 09:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by jaguarmike
www.youtube.com...
Unfortunately I can't say this is authentic in the video, because of the cursor on the screen, please offer input.


You're right to have your doubts about the pentagon video. At best, it's a poor simulation. At worst, it's a blatant fraud.

The video was filmed at the wrong time of day. The end portion of the video was shot looking approximatly North-East. In the video, the brightly lit side of the Pentagon is actually the the South-West side of the building, which is only illuminated by the sun in the afternoon. So, this video was filmed in the afternoon, whereas the actual Pentagon explosion occured at 9:40am.

Another reason to doubt the authenticity of the video is the explosion itself. As others have pointed out, the explosion follows the motion of the camera, and not the motion of the Pentagon. The craptactular CGI effects are even more apparent in the longer version of this video.



posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 09:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by diggs

Originally posted by Jedi_Master
Go back one page in this thread to post # 2222191


Try that...

Oooh that one. Question, what's the original source of that landing gear pic?


I have no idea, are you saying that the pics in that thread are false ???



posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 09:55 PM
link   
I was just asnwering your question. I have no clue if the plane had gears down, but with questions about gears and stuff.

No, I am not adding anything to this exept possable solutions. Nothing I have stated is verifiable fact, unless I say otherwise.


Now were their wheels or not, lets stick to the knowns here.



posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 10:00 PM
link   
Stop. Just stop. Enough already. American Airlines Flight 77 struck the Pentagon at 9:37 a.m. on the morning of September 11 2001. Conspiracy theories must come to an end about this after more than 4 years of intensive investigation. There are high quality images of everything from the fuselage to the landing gear to other parts all over the lawn, eyewitnesses saw a plane crash into the building, the hole along with surrounding damage is consistent with a 757, and autopsy reports have identified remains. Just move on people. Please.

There isn’t a single shred of evidence supporting that something other than AA 77 hit the Pentagon that isn't based on assumption, ignorance, or just simple disregard for the truth. Accept that you were fooled back in 2004 when this conspiracy began to gain momentum and just move on.



posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 10:00 PM
link   
I know my 2 year old sister could make that footage better.



posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 10:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by ADVISOR
No, I am not adding anything to this exept possable solutions. Nothing I have stated is verifiable fact, unless I say otherwise.


Now were their wheels or not, lets stick to the knowns here.


Knowns ???

Yes there were pics of the landing gear taken that's a known fact, and what would a missile need with landing gear ???

Answer is it wouldn't...

So therefore a missile didn't hit the Pentagon no matter how much you folks wish it did...end of Story...



posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 10:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by HybridEB
Stop. Just stop. Enough already. American Airlines Flight 77 struck the Pentagon at 9:37 a.m. on the morning of September 11 2001.


You know that, and I know that...but a lot of these loony toons don't know that...

They still think a missile hit the Pentagon...



posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 10:08 PM
link   
Im so glad we have people like you around.... we dont need to investigate or anything... just need to consult you .... Man hey i have some other questions i need 100% Guaranteed answers on lemme U2U them to you guys....



Honestly you havent shown us any experiments, investigations, or reviews of your own, how do you know 100% becuz our media said so? they also fill they're airtime with "Boy throws cupcake at trucker" and "Britney spears gets knocked up" yes some sites we post speak of UFOs and Guberment hardliners.. but at least we are comparing things an not shuttin them out 100% ....

there is a grey area.....



posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 10:11 PM
link   
Its just someone having a laugh, the superimposed explosion doesn't even match the camera shake.

Its a total amateur job.



posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 10:17 PM
link   
Funny....I don't see a missle in the unedited version.


video.google.com...



posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 10:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Flyer
explosion doesn't even match the camera shake.


I don't see how that is relevent, the concusive blast wave from the explosion would not have even effected the air craft at it's elevation.

After watching it more, I can sort of see how you all fidure it is a good fake. But I still want to see how it was made, and where they got that footage from. It wasn't just made from scratch, what is the source of that material. Where is it's original?



posted on Jun, 2 2006 @ 10:20 PM
link   
Agreed... its just too good to be dismissed soo fast... i love all the Video Majors we have in here? Make me eat my words come on! how do you all know so much its a fake? wheres the Prooof!

You cant handle the Proof!

COme on an Make my Proof!



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join