It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ADVISOR
Alright, I watched it a few times and have concluded the object is under pulsed propulsion. That much is obvious, look how it moves and it's direction and speed.
Originally posted by Periphery
You should really check into that other guy's sprite opinion, it's probably a lot more likely, they are a known atmospheric phenomenon.
Originally posted by Denied
The whole vid is 3 hours long, im strongly suggest any person into UFO's watch this.
Originally posted by Denied
Yes obviously some can be explained, all you need is one of these cases to be of extra terrestrial origin for us to enter a new age, and NASA stop BS us.
Originally posted by Denied
Found this little gem, Evidence: The Case For NASA UFO's
Part one.
video.google.com... q=david+sereda&pl=true
Part two.
video.google.com... david+sereda&pl=true
Im gonna watch this today, maybe it will shed some light on this more.
Enjoy.
He is analyzing this video of objects outside the shuttle making "high speed turns"
Originally posted by Mr Spock
There is a great example of a video which he spends a good amount of time analyzing where two objects appear to make high speed turns. He is analyzing this video of objects outside the shuttle making "high speed turns" yet totally ignores that during these maneuvers, the Earth suddenly and tremendously increases it's rotational speed! This is much more interesting in my opinion, if I were not the only one to notice it. But take the video rec/playback speed into consideration, and the dust or whatever he thinks are UFOs become quite uninteresting. And Dan Aykroyd endorsing this?
originally posted by lost_shaman
I have a link to the video and segment the statement is my own , if you watch the segment in question on the Video in question you'll see that you can see clearly by watching the background closely that the camera is zooming out when the object enters the frame and it "appears" to make a sharp turn when the camera stops zooming out. Its an effect of the camera zoom and not the object actually making a turn.
Evidence: The Case for NASA UFO's Part one
Fast Forward to 35:24 to see the segment in question.
If you keep watching through to the next segment ( 41:15 ) "Hyper-Velocity object" , you'll notice that it too originates from the Same Camera Zoom Out that produced the "Sharp Turn".
This segement as the camera zooms out Sereda concludes not that the Camera was zooming out , but that the object is actually a "Hyper-Velocity object" traveling at 900,000 m/p/h !
i have since heard that this may of been caused by refocusing of the camera causing an effect of it making a tight turn.
Originally posted by Denied
But you can not say ice crystals with this one, nor meteorite.