posted on May, 3 2006 @ 03:06 PM
I know that you and I sit on completely opposites sides of the fense on this issue. Which is okay. I can understand and respect your position - as
long as you understand and respect mine.
Your statements prove my point about conspiracy theories. " just because their is no proof does not make it invalid".
This is what fuels conspiracies. "Proof not required".
So, the fact that I talk, meet with, play golf with and share holidays with CEO's of some of the largest corporations in the US means nothing. So,
my business is no different from a bricklayer - ( I do take considerable offense to that statement.
The business I started supports 26 families). So, they wouldn't be clued in on "nwo and the others". But, these people are the "elites" in US
society. I thought it was the "elites" that were behind all these organizations? If anybody would be clued in to these "secret organizations" it
would be some of these people.
Sorry I picked Angelina Jolie to talk about. Let me put it another way. Say I was a person who was hooked on heroine and I spent a couple of years
down in the dumps. Then I woke up and said, I'm going to live better, get a job and help those less fortunate than me. Would that make me a fake?
That is the point i'm making about angelina jolie. I know, you think its all a fake and a bunch of PR crap. Okay, thats your belief. Can I ask,
what are you doing to help those around you who are less fortunate?
Also, because I "don't believe" and you do, i won't be able to share any of the ironies with you.
This is just about what I expected. This is what makes conspiracies perfect.
And, of course, you made the ultimate conspiracy statement to save yourself, "some of my assumptions may be wrong".
Delta, you and I will never agree on anything, which is okay with me. But, can you see the point I'm trying to make?
[edit on 3-5-2006 by Delta Alter]