It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Omniscient
Originally posted by SilverSurfer
Im not sure how this would work.. not really sure how the accelerators really do their work either.. but is such a gigantic machine really needed to find such small particles
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that the larger the 'circle', the faster that particles can be accelerated on it, provided the rest of the machinery involved is up-to-date and advanced.
Originally posted by newtron25
Still and all, when does this all become an exercise in theoretical "I can pee further than you" academics?
Frankly, I believe that research in this area is due for a change in course in how we go about investigating the minutae of matter. Surely with what we know about quantum physics and what we can harness in the way of laser technology, we could be able to focus energy in different ways on the quantum scale and dissect and observe matter in that way....
Larger and larger magnetic donuts at greater and greater expense yielding incrementally different results...doesn't sound the best to me.
Originally posted by newtron25
What I'm getting at is that particle physics may very well be plowing further and further along the same course of philosophical dogma that has lead it to believe the particle accelerator is the only path towards discovery.
All I am saying is that science often tries too hard along the same lines of thinking without taking the risks necessary to see further.
Invention is far riskier than mere innovation, and although the designs of accelerators such as the Tokamak have been improved upon and innovated upon, the advances have been seen as adaptations.
Show me something new.
We might find something entirely different and heretofore unimagined.
Originally posted by newtron25
But my tax dollars pay for wars as well as partially funding enormous efforts such as science endeavors like the one you are referring to (I won't even use a technical term here.) If you want the United States to be behind you, that is behind the scientific community, then you need to address them without any unnecessary smug attitudes.
You should be happy I'm interested in the subject at all.
Originally posted by newtron25
All I am saying is that science often tries too hard along the same lines of thinking without taking the risks necessary to see further.
Originally posted by Omniscient
I think we'd be better off spending that 8.25 billion in particle research than building more WMDs.