It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gimmefootball400
Here's a few suggestions of mine that just might work. First is to scrutinize all IPs that have an address that coincides with a government address. Second, make it a requirement that all the I.P.s from members and non-members alike are do not match any addresses that may appear suspicious. Third and final one, this may apply only to the forums, make sure that articles posted do not match any of these suspicious I.P. addresses either.
Just a few of my crazy thoughts.
Originally posted by Shawnna
She does not have a single shred of real evidence to back up her insane rantings and frankly, it is above ATS to even acknowledge her existence, much less any of the BS she spews.
Originally posted by ConfederacyOfUnity
im on the fed watchlist cause i got a terrorist charge a couple of years ago.
Originally posted by ConfederacyOfUnity
yeah i agree...i like to say NSA go *enjoy* yourselves...other than that i think nsa and fbi already knows who we are....i know they know who i am...cause im on the fed watchlist cause i got a terrorist charge a couple of years ago. so i guess you could call me ur inhouse ATS Official Terrorist .....BOMBS AWAY kaboom...lol
Originally posted by GlassRunner
So what terrorist act did you commit? Did you blow up a truck full of cow poop?
Originally posted by Majic
Public Privacy
I'm not sure I see a need for SSL encryption all around.
With the exception of a few private forums like RATS and the staff forums, ATS is publicly-accessible.
Even for the private forums, I frankly haven't seen anything that should worry any government -- or ATSers, should the government gain access to it. As much as I love my fellow members, the truth is that from a national security standpoint, we're rather boring.
So for posting and general member access (which consists mostly of browsing public forums anyway), I'm not seeing a driving need or anything that would justify a performance hit -- unless I'm overlooking something.
Low Profile
If I were to look at an area of ATS security that I would want to upgrade, it would be the member login process and profile data.
Another area worthy of ensuring a high level of security for would be all access by staff members: moderators, super-mods and admins.
Any form of interception of any of these accounts or access points would have grave consequences for the security and integrity of the site. So for staff accounts, full-time https might be a good idea.
Also, being a paranoid maniac like I am, I think anything that can ensure the safety of the ATS databases is of utmost importance. If we lose our data, we're gone.
My impression is that there is already a great deal of care taken with the data, but there's no such thing as "too cautious" when it comes to the database at the heart of our online community.
posted by phiniks: “I have to say: for such an enormous forum it's surprisingly fast. It would be a pity if that speed goes down.