NEWS: Ecologist advocates use of Ebola to exterminate 90% of Earth's Population, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 3-4-2006 @ 07:11 AM by Yarcofin
I love that he has a pet bison named Lucifer, he is called "The Lizard Man", and his email is eric.pianka@heaven/hell.com .

I agree with him, as long as I'm not the one to go!

I'd like to share a revelation with you that I've had during my time here. It came when i tried to classify your species, and I realised that you're not actually mammals. You see, every mammal naturally develops a natural equillibrium with it's environment, but you humans do not. You move to an area, and you multiply, and you multiply untill every natural resource is consumed, and the only way to survive is to spread to a new area. There is another life form on this planet that follows the same pattern. A Virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet, and we are the cure.

Agent Smith, The Matrix


I personally feel there are specific people that we could wipe out, that may be enough to stabalize the world first though. Ie. All the old people who have a desire to be euthanized but can't because it's illegal, all the "vegetables" and people with such severe brain trauma or retardation that they can't even tell is going on around them. Both groups are just draining resources. If that isn't enough, then the next group I would choose to go is all the groups of people that show up on the "Christian's Aid" programs on TV. We have been sending money for decades now, and it still is showing no sign of improvement. Why bother paying essentially a voluntary form of welfare and child support for ANOTHER country, when we can just wipe them out and make a better country out of it.

But then there are the "Who are you to choose?" people who wouldn't let it go through

[edit on 3-4-2006 by Yarcofin]


reply posted on 3-4-2006 @ 10:41 AM by Ranger
Originally posted by suzy ryan
Originally posted by Ranger

1. This guy and anyone who agrees should step to the plate first, after that we'll see if we want to follow.

I should at the very least slap him with a trout for merely suggesting my death. I aint dying for no one's demented vision.


Only a trout? How about I pitch in and we make it a swordfish?

But back to your first point; what do all those advocating this line of 'thinking', feel is so wonderfully indispensable about themselves and their loved ones, to keep them safe from, "doing their bit to save the planet"?

Do all those arrogantly sitting at computers, supporting this as a reasonable plan, really think they are more valuable than all those hard working third world country people. Why keep those, softened by excessive western living, alive when those 'uneducated' people can happily live and work on so much less?

The elites will be safe reguardless (in this current worldly system) but only if those cooking, cleaning and slaving for them are happy for any life at all, and aren't once free westerners who resent their 'sacrifice for the planet'.


I said at the very least, a live electric eel would be more adequate.

I can hardly believe the arrogance of people who advocate killing people to reduce the population. Anyway, if there's an outbreak I'm isolating myself deep in the wilderness untill it blows over. If it was deliberate those responsible better hide.

Edit:

I will not submit to dehumanization!

[edit on 3-4-2006 by Ranger]


reply posted on 3-4-2006 @ 01:46 PM by Enkidu
Ninety percent seems a little high. And I don't like the word "exterminate." The same thing could be accomplished long-term with an aggressive birth control program. Oh, but as soon as you drag that idea out, you're every kind of Hitler on the planet. And there are a lot of Hitlers!

The problem is not too many people, it's just that we're too damn big, as animals. If we were the size of squirrels, we'd have plenty of room and resources. Instead of eliminating people, why don't we work on shrinking people down?



reply posted on 3-4-2006 @ 02:29 PM by WyrdeOne
I think before y'all go running off trying to invent shrinking machines, you should look at this.

Overpopulation is a MYTH, a boogey-problem used to soften the market for Hitlerian solutions.

www.ourcivilisation.com...

This is just one link among many. Doing a bit of research, one finds just as many dissenting voices, saying, in effect, 'now hold on a minute! look at the evidence!'

Population is relatively easy to throttle down, and the real problems present themselves in societies with shrinking populations and no means to replace lost folks.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 14 hours ago, 68 replies