It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by snafu7700
actually, we are talking about the possibility of an EMP weapon. you know as well as i do that normal buzzing would not do this kind of damage, even at a very high output. just because i havent heard of an EMP weapon being developed (outside of "the matrix" of course) doesnt mean that it hasnt happened. the damage valhall describes is exactly the damage you would see from an EMP, and it would not in any way effect a cessna. the reason is that a cessna's controls are all pushrods and wires....nothing electronic. the only effect it might have had on a cessna would have been its radios, depending upon its location (i have a feeling that any EMP developed would most likely be a directional weapon....its pretty much useless otherwise). an airliner's controls and instrumentation are completely electronic and would be fried by an EM pulse....especially its electronically controlled engines and flight control surfaces.
now, if we are talking normal electronic buzzing like you would have from a prowler, then you are absolutely correct. But i have long since concluded that the damage described would almost have to be from an EM pulse.
[edit on 25-3-2006 by snafu7700]
Originally posted by JIMC5499
Actually the Prowler can throw out enough energy down a directed bearing to microwave a turkey at a range of two miles. The EA-6B has been known to set off the detonators on missiles and bombs at a considerable distance.
It has been compaired to the Aegis radar for the FLK syndrome. If you don't know what FLK is it means that there is enough radiation to make the pilot of the jammed aircraft produce "Funny Looking Kids".
Originally posted by snafu7700
wow. i knew about the HF hazards but i had no idea they could direct a beam so precisely at two miles.....but if they can do that, then why not an EM pulse directed down one particular bearing so as to have no effect on the originating aircraft or anything behind it?
Originally posted by Truth_is_undeniable
the reason why this theory gets the least amount of attention is because its the easiest to believe and understand. Most people on this site want to think of theories that out of this world but the truth is, none of that demolition in the towers B.S. is true, a missile didnt hit the pentagon, flight 93 was most likely shot down. This is probably one of the only conspiracys that happened on 9/11 and the lack of attention to it is proof enough. Do you really think that if bush planned all of 9/11 and put explosives in the towers to bring them down that anyone would have figured it out? People need to stop being paranoid and except things for what they are, except for Flight 93.
my brother was in arlington national cemetary and saw the plane come in and hit the pentagon. I think ill believe my brothers eye-witness account rather then some information i get from a poorly made internet documentary.
Originally posted by fm258
Lying about one of the events will also draw suspicion to the rest. There is plenty to be suspicious about, at all of the impact sites....
pentagon, the confiscating of all area videos MINUTES after the impact. The conflicting eyewitness reports...the lack of any major remnants of a 757...the incredible skill of the pilot to perform maneuvers that border on the miraculous....3 full sections of the building were penetrated by a hollow aluminum tube...there are more, but you get the idea.
Thank you sir. Im always amazed at some of the stuff that ATS members know.
black helicopters dont necessarily mean that theres something strange going on. Theres many helicopters used by militarys across the planet that are painted all black without any markings. There not uncommon at all
Originally posted by Skibum
Just a thought?
Could the boom that was heard have possibly one of the engines malfunctioning due to something that the passengers did while possibly trying to get control of the plane?
Maybe they accidentally "overrevved" and blew one of the engines while trying to slow the plane down or something. I don't know.
Is such a thing even possible?
Originally posted by Lanton
A bunch of assumptions have been made on a few solid facts; that there was a C-130 in the general area of the crash-site, that ONE (yes, only one) individual claimed to have lost power to his house around the time the flight crashed into that field,
Originally posted by Valhall
Originally posted by Lanton
A bunch of assumptions have been made on a few solid facts; that there was a C-130 in the general area of the crash-site, that ONE (yes, only one) individual claimed to have lost power to his house around the time the flight crashed into that field,
You still haven't read the thread, have you?
A good five pages back I posted that the entire town had power failure, but that it could have been caused by a downed power line. I also posted that I have emailed a media source in Philadelphia asking if they ascertained what the cause of the power outage was, what the cause of the land line phone system failing was, and why the cell tower receiver went out. I have not received a response yet, but I will continue to ask these questions.