It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by esdad71
Remeber, there was also a small Cessna, who pilot was asked if he could see the plane to verify location, and then was 'immediatley' told to leave the area.
He is in no fear of bieng struck by the aircraft, but he would have been a witness so he is asked to move away "after" verifying where Flight 93 is.
Originally posted by Primary Mover
NO EVIDENCE, so lets let those poor folk rest in peace !
is it not possible that the boom heard when the aircraft was 8 miles from the crash site could have been a sonic boom from the aircraft entering a condition of overspeed as it plummeted toward the ground? overspeed would have caused structural failure and could explain the debris field. just a thought.
Originally posted by esdad71
I didn't think they were sonic booms from the jets, but the explosions from the missle or engine if fired upon. This would explain the begin of a debris field, and it would also explain why the 'pilot' suddenly turned and was flying 'evasivly'. Did he see the American F-16 and was unsure what to do?
Originally posted by esdad71
the only reason I would disagree with the EMP weapon, is the Cessna and the business jet in the area. I know most military craft are enginnered for EMP but are civilian craft? This would be interesting to investigate those 2 aircraft and service logs. Would they have been in the range?
Originally posted by spearhead
What i think makes it believable though, is that if this was 'false flag' attack
the Airforce has certainly shown no knowledge of it. but that isn't uncommon, is it?
Originally posted by esdad71
Correct, the EMP would cause electrical problems and they would not have been able to navigate, so would that not have to have been replaced? That is why I was suggesting logs for the plane.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
Funny thing is that aircraft are not really affected by EMP.
Originally posted by snafu7700
i'd have to disagree with that assertation. an EMP fries virtually all electronic equipment in close proximity to its blast. a cessna would not be affected, nor would an older model private jet. however, at this point in time about 90 percent of commercial aviation is fly-by-wire. an EMP would make your typical airliner completely uncontrollable, to say nothing of the effects on the modern "glass" cockpits.