Flight 93 was shot down over Pennsylvania, and this is the biggest 9/11 cover up of them all., page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times
Topic started on 23-3-2006 @ 12:27 AM by esdad71
Flight 93 crashed over Pennsylvania, and this is the biggest 9/11 cover up of them all. This is an analysis of how Mineta alone could have changed everything with his testimony to cover up the fact that Flight 93 met US aircraft and was shot down. There was no stand down order, just an order to take down any non responding aircraft.

After the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, President Bush gave the military orders to intercept and shoot down any commercial airliners that refused instructions to turn away from Washington.
Later, in an interview on Meet the Press,VP Dick Cheney would state "I wholeheartedly concurred in the decision he made, that if the plane would not divert, if they wouldn't pay any attention to instructions to move away from the city, as a last resort our pilots were authorized to take them out."
This would mean that when Cheney was asked if the order still stands, it means that the order to take down those planes was in effect. However....



www.911dossier.co.uk...

Testimoy of Norman Mineta on about Cheney's actions is revealing. Mineta said he arrived at the Presidential Emergency Operating Center (PEOC) at 9:20 a.m. where he observed the Vice President talking to a young airman.

Mineta: There was a young man who had come in and said to the vice president, "The plane is 50 miles out.The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to, "The plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the vice president, "Do the orders still stand?"

And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?" Well, at the time I didn't know what all that meant"



I cannot find anything about who the 'young man' is, so the only one who is giving a time is Mineta.

If times are consistent, this time table means he is referring to the Pentgon plane. But what if Mineta is changing the timeline? There is no way that anyone would second guess what Cheney said, because the plane was not shot down. This would mean that Cheney was enforcing the 'standdown' in his response.This is where the story ends and the government wants it that way. When in fact , what he was stating was that the order was in effect and the plane was to be shot down. It later was.

Why would he, Mineta, do this? To cover up the fact that we shot down a civilian aircraft filled with Americans. Look into Mineta's background and you will find he is the perfect candidate for something such as this. He is the only democrat in Bushs cabinet, and the only holdover.
He was also Army Intel, and a VP at Lockheed Martin. This was not your average guy, yet so much rides on his three simple lines of testimony.

Now, at 10:06:05 United Airlines Flight 93 crashes near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, in Somerset county, about 80 miles southeast of Pittsburgh. This is about 15 minutesoutside of DC. An eyewitness reports seeing a white plane resembling a fighter jet circling the site just after the crash.
The F-16's from Langley AFB arrived in Washington D.C at 9:49 a.m. The F-16 has a top speed of 1500 MPH.

After the Pentagon gets hit by American Airlines Flight 77 at 9:37, there is only one airliner left in the sky with its transponder signal off, and once again heading directly for Washington D.C., and that is United Airlines Flight 93.

Now, Flying at top speed these F-16’s could have intercepted United Airlines Flight 93 in under 8 minutes according to numerous reports. Why didn’t these F-16’s try to intercept United Airlines Flight 93? How could they not go after the last threat? The fact is that they did


It is also interesting to note that the F-16's were not carrying missles, although accounts vary, and were armed only with 20 mm cannons. This may lead to explain why debris was found over a very wide area, and that the engines suddenly stopped. The roar of the engines may have masked the 20mm of the F-16's, but would have shredded the engines. If they did not have live missles, there would be no other way and would leave a trail of debris.

and then there are these facts



archive.democrats.com...

* THE DEBRIS FIELD. The reclaimed mine where the plane crashed is composed of very soft soil, and searchers say much of the wreckage was found buried 20-25 feet below the large crater. But despite that, there was also widely scattered debris in the immediate vicinity and further afield. Considerable debris washed up more than two miles away at Indian Lake, and a canceled check and brokerage statement from the plane was found in a deep valley some eight miles away that week.


* THE ENGINE. While the FBI and other authorities have said the plane was mostly obliterated by the roughly 500 mph impact, they also said an engine - or at least a 1,000-pound piece of one - was found "a considerable distance" from the crater. Stuhl, the Shanksville mayor, said it was found in the woods just west of the crash. That information is intriguing to shoot-down theory proponents, since the heat-seeking, air-to-air Sidewinder missiles aboard an F-16 would likely target one of the Boeing 757's two large engines.



From 911review.org...

Shortly after 911, a flight controller in New Hampshire ignores a ban on air traffic controllers speaking to the media, and it is reported he claims "that an F-16 fighter closely pursued United Airlines Flight 93... the F-16 made 360-degree turns to remain close to the commercial jet, the controller said. 'He must've seen the whole thing,' the controller said of the F-16 pilot's view of Flight 93's crash."




The media then pumps up the country with the story of the passengers taking the cockpit. I am not stating that this did not happen, but the account may vary. It also made for a great media release, so everyone will remember 'lets roll' and not the mystery white plane.

I think it is a pretty good idea of how they could have covered up the intentional shooting and downing of flight 93, and it all revolves around the testimony of one man. There was no stand down, but how else can you sway the public opinion when you want everyone to believe it? You create one conspiracy to hide another.

Mod fix - ex tags

[edit on 23/3/2006 by Umbrax]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Why the Pentagon?
  Posted 3 days ago with 12 member flags
NEVER FORGET 9-11….Maybe we SHOULD forget.
  Posted 11 days ago with 11 member flags
Personal Theory on The Twin Towers Plane Pilots
  Posted 0 days ago with 8 member flags
The 9/11 Hijackers: Fraud in Official Video Exhibits Uncovered
  Posted 1 days ago with 7 member flags
Note from trapped workers surfaces 10 years after 9/11
  Posted 1 days ago with 6 member flags
Where were you when the world stopped turning...
  Posted 2 days ago with 4 member flags