Flight 93 crashed over Pennsylvania, and this is the biggest 9/11 cover up of them all. This is an analysis of how Mineta alone could have changed
everything with his testimony to cover up the fact that Flight 93 met US aircraft and was shot down. There was no stand down order, just an order to
take down any non responding aircraft.
After the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, President Bush gave the military orders to intercept and shoot down any commercial
airliners that refused instructions to turn away from Washington.
Later, in an interview on Meet the Press,VP Dick Cheney would state "I wholeheartedly concurred in the decision he made, that if the plane would
not divert, if they wouldn't pay any attention to instructions to move away from the city, as a last resort our pilots were authorized to take them
This would mean that when Cheney was asked if the order still stands, it means that the order to take down those planes was in effect. However....
Testimoy of Norman Mineta on about Cheney's actions is revealing. Mineta said he arrived at the Presidential Emergency Operating Center (PEOC) at
9:20 a.m. where he observed the Vice President talking to a young airman.
Mineta: There was a young man who had come in and said to the vice president, "The plane is 50 miles out.The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got
down to, "The plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the vice president, "Do the orders still stand?"
And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"
Well, at the time I didn't know what all that meant"
I cannot find anything about who the 'young man' is, so the only one who is giving a time is Mineta.
If times are consistent, this time table means he is referring to the Pentgon plane. But what if Mineta is changing the timeline? There is no way that
anyone would second guess what Cheney said, because the plane was not shot down. This would mean that Cheney was enforcing the 'standdown' in his
response.This is where the story ends and the government wants it that way. When in fact , what he was stating was that the order was in effect and
the plane was to be shot down. It later was.
Why would he, Mineta, do this? To cover up the fact that we shot down a civilian aircraft filled with Americans. Look into Mineta's background and
you will find he is the perfect candidate for something such as this. He is the only democrat in Bushs cabinet, and the only holdover.
He was also Army Intel, and a VP at Lockheed Martin. This was not your average guy, yet so much rides on his three simple lines of testimony.
Now, at 10:06:05 United Airlines Flight 93 crashes near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, in Somerset county, about 80 miles southeast of Pittsburgh. This
is about 15 minutesoutside of DC. An eyewitness reports seeing a white plane resembling a fighter jet circling the site just after the crash.
The F-16's from Langley AFB arrived in Washington D.C at 9:49 a.m. The F-16 has a top speed of 1500 MPH.
After the Pentagon gets hit by American Airlines Flight 77 at 9:37, there is only one airliner left in the sky with its transponder signal off, and
once again heading directly for Washington D.C., and that is United Airlines Flight 93.
Now, Flying at top speed these F-16’s could have intercepted United Airlines Flight 93 in under 8 minutes according to numerous reports. Why
didn’t these F-16’s try to intercept United Airlines Flight 93? How could they not go after the last threat? The fact is that they did
It is also interesting to note that the F-16's were not carrying missles, although accounts vary, and were armed only with 20 mm cannons. This
may lead to explain why debris was found over a very wide area, and that the engines suddenly stopped. The roar of the engines may have masked the
20mm of the F-16's, but would have shredded the engines. If they did not have live missles, there would be no other way and would leave a trail of
and then there are these facts
* THE DEBRIS FIELD. The reclaimed mine where the plane crashed is composed of very soft soil, and searchers say much of the wreckage was found buried
20-25 feet below the large crater. But despite that, there was also widely scattered debris in the immediate vicinity and further afield. Considerable
debris washed up more than two miles away at Indian Lake, and a canceled check and brokerage statement from the plane was found in a deep valley some
eight miles away that week.
* THE ENGINE. While the FBI and other authorities have said the plane was mostly obliterated by the roughly 500 mph impact, they also said an engine -
or at least a 1,000-pound piece of one - was found "a considerable distance" from the crater. Stuhl, the Shanksville mayor, said it was found in the
woods just west of the crash. That information is intriguing to shoot-down theory proponents, since the heat-seeking, air-to-air Sidewinder missiles
aboard an F-16 would likely target one of the Boeing 757's two large engines.
Shortly after 911, a flight controller in New Hampshire ignores a ban on air traffic controllers speaking to the media, and it is reported he claims
"that an F-16 fighter closely pursued United Airlines Flight 93... the F-16 made 360-degree turns to remain close to the commercial jet, the
controller said. 'He must've seen the whole thing,' the controller said of the F-16 pilot's view of Flight 93's crash."
The media then pumps up the country with the story of the passengers taking the cockpit. I am not stating that this did not happen, but the account
may vary. It also made for a great media release, so everyone will remember 'lets roll' and not the mystery white plane.
I think it is a pretty good idea of how they could have covered up the intentional shooting and downing of flight 93, and it all revolves around the
testimony of one man. There was no stand down, but how else can you sway the public opinion when you want everyone to believe it? You create one
conspiracy to hide another.
Mod fix - ex tags
[edit on 23/3/2006 by Umbrax]