Originally posted by AdamJ
because i though the idea was to devalue the family and promote science and atheism. At least thats what the right wing christians are saying that
schools are obsessed with darwinism, sex education and things like that.
I'm not too sure of the direction you're coming from, but...
The liberal teachings don't want to devalue the family, they want to expand the meaning of family to encompass non-traditional families, such as
same-sex parents and single parents to be treated as valid families.
Promote science? Yeah. Science is good.

They also 'promote' math, english, reading, social studies... you know, school subjects. Evolution is
science. They're no more 'obsessed' with it than they are with mathematics.
Promote atheism? No. I don't know that atheism is being promoted in the schools. In my experience, Atheists don't push their beliefs like religious
folk do.
Sex education? If parents did it, teachers wouldn't have to. But as long as the schools are teaching sex education, then they should cover all
aspects, not just abstenance.
Surely it would be a misidentification of the problem then to describe the ideals being forced on people as conservative?
Use whatever word you want to use. Fundamenta, old-fashioned, conservative, traditional, conventional...
maybe some false left, right paradigms are involved here?
Could be. Maybe if you elaborate I'd know what you mean.