But how do you explain the impact damage which is clearly present?
It is there, something caused it - how would you cause it with explosives?
It seems pretty consistant with the dimensions of the wing itself.
Maybe some of it is blown out where fuel ignited within the building?
The tail fin is angled and relatively fragile, it may have disintegrated, following the rest of the plane into the building.
And once again, even if it was some other aircraft - where is it's tailfin and the corresponding mark on the wall? You still have the same problem to
prove your version.
ATC did have a contact which they tracked down to the Pentagon, as well as the countless witnesses so there had to be an aircraft of some sort at
Where are the holes from the alternative craft's engines?
Where are the holes from the wings and if they disintegrated with only those marks I showed visible why can they not be 757 wings?
Where is the tailfin of the 'real' aircraft and why is it possible it is not visible for some reason but the same can't apply to the 757?
How could so many people confuse a missile, disguised or not, for a 757?
What caused the circular cutout in the fence around the generator that looks the same shape and size as an engine?
In the image at the top of this post, why is the impact damage obviously caused from the outside if it was caused by bombs inside?
If it wasn't caused from the outside, how come outer layers are damaged and inner layers are intact? How do these bombs work?
What was the edged piece of something
that caused those marks?
Why are you saying the columns are blown out? They look like they have tipped to the right in my opinon.
[edit on 6-3-2006 by AgentSmith]